From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf: Suggest inbuilt commands for unknown command
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:32:50 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZfsBopALY3whsst5@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zfr-sQJPbZzbtk8K@x1>
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 12:20:20PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 08:12:56AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > Ah, the change:
> >
> > - static int done_help;
> > + int done_help;
> >
> > created an uninitialized use. Compiler warning/sanitizers? Anyway,
> > done_help needs hoisting out of the loop and initializing to zero, or
> > being made static again (ugh).
>
> ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ git diff
> diff --git a/tools/perf/perf.c b/tools/perf/perf.c
> index c719e6ccd9e27778..f9532b20e87cbf05 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/perf.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/perf.c
> @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ static int libperf_print(enum libperf_print_level level,
>
> int main(int argc, const char **argv)
> {
> - int err;
> + int err, done_help = 0;
> const char *cmd;
> char sbuf[STRERR_BUFSIZE];
>
> @@ -558,8 +558,6 @@ int main(int argc, const char **argv)
> pthread__block_sigwinch();
>
> while (1) {
> - int done_help;
> -
> run_argv(&argc, &argv);
>
> if (errno != ENOENT)
> ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ perf raccord
> Fatal: Out of memory, realloc failed
> ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$
>
> Then:
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/perf.c b/tools/perf/perf.c
> index c719e6ccd9e27778..54f62aa6612bc290 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/perf.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/perf.c
> @@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ int main(int argc, const char **argv)
> pthread__block_sigwinch();
>
> while (1) {
> - int done_help;
> + static int done_help;
>
> run_argv(&argc, &argv);
>
> ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ perf raccord
> Fatal: Out of memory, realloc failed
> ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$
That main_cmds variable is uninitialized, which ends up making
add_cmdname() to explode, are you sure this is working on your side?
Further clarifying, this is without considering the second patch, I
haven't got to it yet, from what I recall from the description it
shouldn't matter tho.
- Arnaldo
⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ git diff
diff --git a/tools/perf/perf.c b/tools/perf/perf.c
index c719e6ccd9e27778..164b3c78baff4204 100644
--- a/tools/perf/perf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/perf.c
@@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ int main(int argc, const char **argv)
pthread__block_sigwinch();
while (1) {
- int done_help;
+ static int done_help;
run_argv(&argc, &argv);
@@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ int main(int argc, const char **argv)
break;
if (!done_help) {
- struct cmdnames main_cmds;
+ struct cmdnames main_cmds = { 0, };
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(commands); i++) {
add_cmdname(&main_cmds,
⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ perf raccord
perf: 'raccord' is not a perf-command. See 'perf --help'.
⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-20 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-01 20:13 [PATCH v2 1/2] perf: Suggest inbuilt commands for unknown command Ian Rogers
2024-03-01 20:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] perf help: Lower levenshtein penality for deleting character Ian Rogers
2024-03-20 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] perf: Suggest inbuilt commands for unknown command Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-20 15:00 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-20 15:12 ` Ian Rogers
2024-03-20 15:20 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-20 15:25 ` Ian Rogers
2024-03-20 15:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2024-03-20 15:40 ` Ian Rogers
2024-03-20 15:41 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-20 15:44 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-20 17:07 ` Ian Rogers
2024-03-20 19:34 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZfsBopALY3whsst5@x1 \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.