From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dave@treblig.org>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-riscv@nongnu.org,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Manos Pitsidianakis" <manos.pitsidianakis@linaro.org>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
devel@lists.libvirt.org, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-for-9.0 0/2] target/monitor: Deprecate 'info tlb/mem' in favor of 'info mmu'
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 21:59:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZftcTb2_O8zHPd3Z@gallifrey> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_4J32gpUgxXxND8ZVhrEEhFK=gPG2SF8xsVJ+jpkV0WA@mail.gmail.com>
* Peter Maydell (peter.maydell@linaro.org) wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 17:06, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > +Alex/Daniel
> >
> > On 20/3/24 17:53, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 16:40, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> 'info tlb' and 'info mem' commands don't scale in heterogeneous
> > >> emulation. They will be reworked after the next release, hidden
> > >> behind the 'info mmu' command. It is not too late to deprecate
> > >> commands, so add the 'info mmu' command as wrapper to the other
> > >> ones, but already deprecate them.
> > >>
> > >> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (2):
> > >> target/monitor: Introduce 'info mmu' command
> > >> target/monitor: Deprecate 'info tlb' and 'info mem' commands
> > >
> > > This seems to replace "info tlb" and "info mem" with "info mmu -t"
> > > and "info mmu -m", but it doesn't really say anything about:
> > > * what the difference is between these two things
> >
> > I really don't know; I'm only trying to keep the monitor interface
> > identical.
>
> You don't, though: you change it from "info tlb" to "info mmu -t" etc.
>
> > > * which targets implement which and why
> >
> > This one is easy to answer:
> >
> > #if defined(TARGET_I386) || defined(TARGET_SH4) || defined(TARGET_SPARC)
> > || \
> > defined(TARGET_PPC) || defined(TARGET_XTENSA) || defined(TARGET_M68K)
> > {
> > .name = "tlb",
> >
> > #if defined(TARGET_I386) || defined(TARGET_RISCV)
> > {
> > .name = "mem",
> >
> > > * what the plan is for the future
> >
> > My problem is with linking a single QEMU binary, as these two symbols
> > (hmp_info_mem and hmp_info_tlb) clash.
>
> Yes, but they both (implicitly) operate on the current HMP CPU,
> so the problem with linking into a single binary is that they're
> not indirected through a method on the CPU object, not the syntax
> used in the monitor to invoke them, presumably.
>
> > I'm indeed only postponing the problem, without looking at what
> > this code does. I did it adding hmp_info_mmu_tlb/mem hooks in
> > TCGCPUOps ("hw/core/tcg-cpu-ops.h"), so the command can be
> > dispatched per target vcpu as target-agnostic code in
> > monitor/hmp-cmds.c:
> >
> > +#include "hw/core/tcg-cpu-ops.h"
> > +
> > +static void hmp_info_mmu_tlb(Monitor *mon, CPUState *cpu)
> > +{
> > + const TCGCPUOps *tcg_ops = cpu->cc->tcg_ops;
> > +
> > + if (tcg_ops->hmp_info_mmu_tlb) {
> > + tcg_ops->hmp_info_mmu_tlb(mon, cpu_env(cpu));
> > + } else {
> > + monitor_puts(mon, "No per-CPU information available on this
> > target\n");
> > + }
> > +}
>
> These aren't TCG specific though, so why TCGCPUOps ?
>
> > > I am definitely not a fan of either of these commands, because
> > > (as we currently implement them) they effectively require each
> > > target architecture to implement a second copy of the page table
> > > walking code. But before we can deprecate them we need to be
> > > pretty sure that "info mmu" is what we want to replace them with.
> >
> > An alternative is to just deprecate them, without adding "info mmu" :)
> >
> > It is OK to un-deprecate stuff if we realize its usefulness.
>
> The commands are there because some users find them useful.
> I just dislike them because I think they're a bit niche and
> annoying to implement and not consistent across target
> architectures and not very well documented...
>
> By the way, we have no obligation to follow the deprecate-and-drop
> process for HMP commands; unlike QMP, we give ourselves the
> license to vary it when we feel like it, because the users are
> humans, not programs or scripts.
Right, so no rush to get the deprecation in; change it when you agree
what you'd like a replacement to look like.
Dave
> -- PMM
--
-----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \
\ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex /
\ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-21 5:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-20 16:40 [PATCH-for-9.0 0/2] target/monitor: Deprecate 'info tlb/mem' in favor of 'info mmu' Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-03-20 16:40 ` [PATCH-for-9.0 1/2] target/monitor: Introduce 'info mmu' command Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-03-20 16:40 ` [PATCH-for-9.0 2/2] target/monitor: Deprecate 'info tlb' and 'info mem' commands Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-03-20 16:53 ` [PATCH-for-9.0 0/2] target/monitor: Deprecate 'info tlb/mem' in favor of 'info mmu' Peter Maydell
2024-03-20 17:06 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-03-20 17:17 ` Peter Maydell
2024-03-20 21:59 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZftcTb2_O8zHPd3Z@gallifrey \
--to=dave@treblig.org \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=devel@lists.libvirt.org \
--cc=manos.pitsidianakis@linaro.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.