All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: remove CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:36:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zftk3tzC2btb3Ine@P9FQF9L96D> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240320202745.740843-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org>

On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 04:27:45PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM used to be a user-visible option for whether slab
> tracking is enabled. It has been default-enabled and equivalent to
> CONFIG_MEMCG for almost a decade. We've only grown more kernel memory
> accounting sites since, and there is no imaginable cgroup usecase
> going forward that wants to track user pages but not the multitude of
> user-drivable kernel allocations.

I totally support it. I believe one of the reasons for it to exist
was SLOB, which hasn't been supporting the slab memory accounting.
No such reasons anymore.

Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>

Thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-20 22:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-20 20:27 [PATCH] mm: remove CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM Johannes Weiner
2024-03-20 22:36 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2024-03-20 23:45   ` Johannes Weiner
2024-03-21 12:58 ` Michal Hocko
2024-03-21 13:33   ` Johannes Weiner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-07-01 15:31 Johannes Weiner
2024-07-01 16:14 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-07-02 13:17 ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zftk3tzC2btb3Ine@P9FQF9L96D \
    --to=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.