Problem with the RFC 8009 encryption test

[Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com>]

Hi Chuck,

When testing a fix for the problem that Nico reported [1], I found some
oddness with the RFC 8009 encryption test.  Sometimes it would pass,
sometimes it would fail, and other times it would oops.  I bisected it to:

561141dd4943 SUNRPC: Use a static buffer for the checksum initialization vector

If I build a kernel with CONFIG_DEBUG_SG=y, I get the following oops

[   40.417220] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   40.421884] kernel BUG at include/linux/scatterlist.h:187!
[   40.424490] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
[   40.427511] CPU: 4 PID: 3688 Comm: kunit_try_catch Kdump: loaded Tainted: G                 N 6.8.0+ #13
[   40.430025] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014
[   40.432291] RIP: 0010:sg_init_one+0x85/0xa0
[   40.433238] Code: 51 5b 37 01 83 e1 03 f6 c3 03 75 20 a8 01 75 1e 48 09 cb 41 89 54 24 08 49 89 1c 24 41 89 6c 24 0c 5b 5d 41 5c c3 cc cc cc cc <0f> 0b 0f 0b 0f 0b 48 8b 05 3e 26 9f 01 eb b2 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00
[   40.437191] RSP: 0018:ffffab2ac2d87cf0 EFLAGS: 00010246
[   40.438129] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffffc0ce8740 RCX: 0000000000000000
[   40.439359] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000040ce8740
[   40.440566] RBP: 0000000000000010 R08: 258143ae43c375cb R09: 0000000000000000
[   40.441741] R10: ffffab2ac2d87d20 R11: 7e6f455c48ff50b7 R12: ffffab2ac2d87d20
[   40.442920] R13: ffff90de0a3e1400 R14: 0000000000000020 R15: 0000000000000010
[   40.444142] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff90df77c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[   40.445498] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[   40.446485] CR2: 00007f64586dc998 CR3: 000000023f220003 CR4: 0000000000770ef0
[   40.447743] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[   40.448962] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[   40.450196] PKRU: 55555554
[   40.450700] Call Trace:
[   40.451155]  <TASK>
[   40.451544]  ? die+0x36/0x90
[   40.452090]  ? do_trap+0xdd/0x100
[   40.452690]  ? sg_init_one+0x85/0xa0
[   40.453361]  ? do_error_trap+0x6a/0x90
[   40.454029]  ? sg_init_one+0x85/0xa0
[   40.454671]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70
[   40.455358]  ? sg_init_one+0x85/0xa0
[   40.456009]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
[   40.456776]  ? sg_init_one+0x85/0xa0
[   40.457408]  krb5_etm_checksum+0x114/0x1d0 [rpcsec_gss_krb5]
[   40.458372]  rfc8009_encrypt_case+0x397/0x8f0 [gss_krb5_test]
[   40.459360]  ? __schedule+0x3e8/0x1520
[   40.460027]  ? __pfx_kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x10/0x10 [kunit]
[   40.461180]  ? kunit_try_run_case+0x93/0x190 [kunit]
[   40.462043]  kunit_try_run_case+0x93/0x190 [kunit]
[   40.462881]  kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x17/0x30 [kunit]
[   40.463929]  kthread+0xcf/0x100
[   40.464498]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[   40.465165]  ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50
[   40.465810]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[   40.466477]  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[   40.467173]  </TASK>
[   40.467593] Modules linked in: camellia_generic camellia_aesni_avx2 camellia_aesni_avx_x86_64 camellia_x86_64 gss_krb5_test rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss kunit nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6 nft_reject nft_ct nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 rfkill nf_tables sunrpc intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common intel_uncore_frequency_common isst_if_common kvm_intel kvm iTCO_wdt intel_pmc_bxt iTCO_vendor_support i2c_i801 rapl i2c_smbus lpc_ich virtio_balloon joydev loop fuse nfnetlink zram xfs crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel polyval_clmulni polyval_generic ghash_clmulni_intel sha512_ssse3 sha256_ssse3 sha1_ssse3 virtio_blk virtio_net net_failover virtio_console failover serio_raw qemu_fw_cfg
[   40.478684] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Looking through the git history of the auth_gss code, there are various
places where static buffers were replaced by dynamically allocated ones
because they're being used with scatterlists. 

I think this patch should be reverted.

-Scott

[1] https://groups.google.com/g/kunit-dev/c/QDK1PgWJEdQ