All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Anne Macedo <retpolanne@posteo.net>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] perf lock contention: skip traceiter functions
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:48:39 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZfydJzGgz4qy7Inh@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZfyRWZqxypTzdvQF@x1>

On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 04:58:20PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Thanks, testing it now on x86_64 and aarch64, will apply it then.

Done, applied, on aarch64:

root@roc-rk3399-pc:~# perf lock contention --use-bpf -a find / > /dev/null
 contended   total wait     max wait     avg wait         type   caller

         6      6.03 s       6.03 s       1.00 s      spinlock   __tick_broadcast_oneshot_control+0xc0
        19    811.74 ms    621.76 ms     42.72 ms     spinlock   rcu_core+0xec
         2    201.76 ms    201.75 ms    100.88 ms     spinlock   sugov_update_shared+0x44
         6      7.80 ms      2.35 ms      1.30 ms        mutex   regulator_lock_recursive+0x144
         1    702.63 us    702.63 us    702.63 us      rwsem:W   __btrfs_tree_lock+0x2c
         4     62.42 us     18.96 us     15.60 us     spinlock   tick_do_update_jiffies64+0x44
         2     39.96 us     22.17 us     19.98 us     spinlock   __tick_broadcast_oneshot_control+0xc0
         2     33.83 us     18.08 us     16.92 us        mutex   mmc_blk_rw_wait+0x138
         1     21.58 us     21.58 us     21.58 us     spinlock   sugov_update_shared+0x44
         1     16.92 us     16.92 us     16.92 us     spinlock   cpu_pm_enter+0x34
         1     16.04 us     16.04 us     16.04 us        mutex   clk_prepare_lock+0x4c
root@roc-rk3399-pc:~# uname -a
Linux roc-rk3399-pc 6.1.68-12200-g1c40dda3081e #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Dec 14 04:02:49 EST 2023 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux
root@roc-rk3399-pc:~#

its in tmp.perf-tools-next, will move to perf-tools-next in the next batch, after build
tests together with other patches.

Thanks!

- Arnaldo

      reply	other threads:[~2024-03-21 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-19 14:36 [PATCH v4] perf lock contention: skip traceiter functions Anne Macedo
2024-03-20 22:54 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-03-21 19:58 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-21 20:48   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZfydJzGgz4qy7Inh@x1 \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=retpolanne@posteo.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.