From: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org, eric.auger@redhat.com,
peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
jean-philippe@linaro.org, alex.bennee@linaro.org, maz@kernel.org,
julien@xen.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/12] SMMUv3 nested translation support
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 10:39:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zg0xyXBXGa8_Kx6k@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZgyGfMz7IktmwtP/@Asurada-Nvidia>
Hi Nicolin,
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 03:28:12PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> Hi Mostafa,
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 10:13:56AM +0000, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> >
> > Currently, QEMU supports emulating either stage-1 or stage-2 SMMUs
> > but not nested instances.
> > This patch series adds support for nested translation in SMMUv3,
> > this is controlled by property “arm-smmuv3.stage=nested”, and
> > advertised to guests as (IDR0.S1P == 1 && IDR0.S2P == 2)
>
> IIUIC, with this series, vSMMU will support a virtualized 2-stage
> translation in a guest VM, right? I wonder how it would interact
I always get confused with terminologies when dealing with QEMU;
as the host can mean the actual host (which is x86_64 in my case)
and the guest would aarch64 Linux fully emulated by QEMU, and the
emulated guest can be considered a host and launch it’s guests wit
KVM for example. This also will be more fun with guests supporting
nested virtualization :)
For simplicity, I will consider:
- HOST: the fully emulated QEMU guest (aarch64) running on my machine.
- GUEST: Any guest launched by the HOST (through KVM for example)
- QEMU: Is the instance of QEMU emulating the HOST (built for x86)
- QEMU-VMM: Is the instance of QEMU running on the HOST (built for
aarch64) which launches VMs(GUESTs).
With that, AFAIU, vSMMU is the SMMUv3 emulation used for GUESTs with
QEMU-VMM, where it has hooks in CMDQ and then the QEMU-VMM will issue
IOCTLs to the HOST to do the actual SMMU work (through iommufd or IIRC
there was previous patches from Eric that does that also), also the
vSMMU is out of tree AFAICT.
In that case, this work is orthogonal to that, the nested SMMUv3
emulation in this series mainly targets QEMU which is advertised
to the HOST, which then allows it to use iommufd with GUESts.
In theory, that work can be extended to QEMU-VMM with vSMMU, but
I guess that would be a lot of work as the VMM needs to collapse
both stages as the kernel provides only one address space for the VMM.
Mainly, I use this patches to test nesting patches I am hacking for
KVM, also they can be used with your patches to test iommufd with
needing hardware. (See testing section in the cover letter)
> with the ongoing 2-stage nesting support with host and guest. Or
> is it supposed to be just a total orthogonal feature without any
> interaction with the host system?
Are you referring to the iommufd work on Linux to support nesting?
Thanks,
Mostafa
> Thanks
> Nicolin
>
> > Main changes(architecture):
> > ============================
> > 1) CDs are considered IPA and translated with stage-2.
> > 2) TTBx and tables for stage-1 are considered IPA and translated
> > with stage-2.
> > 3) Translate the IPA address with stage-2.
> >
> > TLBs:
> > ======
> > TLBs are the most tricky part.
> >
> > 1) General design
> > Unified(Combined) design is used, where a new tag is added "stage"
> > which has 2 valid values:
> > - STAGE_1: Meaning this entry translates VA to PADDR, it can be
> > cached from fully nested configuration or from stage-1 only.
> > It doesn't support separate cached entries (VA to IPA).
> >
> > - STAGE_2: Meaning this translates IPA to PADDR, cached from
> > stage-2 only configuration.
> >
> > TLBs are also modified to cache 2 permissions, a new permission added
> > "parent_perm."
> >
> > For non-nested configuration, perm == parent_perm and nothing
> > changes. This is used to know which stage to use in case there is
> > a permission fault from a TLB entry.
> >
> > 2) Caching in TLB
> > Stage-1 and stage-2 are inserted in the TLB as is.
> > For nested translation, both entries are combined into one TLB
> > entry. Everything is used from stage-1, except:
> > - transatled_addr from stage-2.
> > - parent_perm is from stage-2.
> > - addr_mask: is the minimum of both.
> >
> > 3) TLB Lookup
> > For stage-1 and nested translations, it look for STAGE_1 entries.
> > For stage-2 it look for STAGE_2 TLB entries.
> >
> > 4) TLB invalidation
> > - Stage-1 commands (CMD_TLBI_NH_VAA, SMMU_CMD_TLBI_NH_VA,
> > SMMU_CMD_TLBI_NH_ALL): Invalidate TLBs tagged with SMMU_STAGE_1.
> > - Stage-2 commands (CMD_TLBI_S2_IPA): Invalidate TLBs tagged with
> > SMMU_STAGE_2.
> > - All (SMMU_CMD_TLBI_S12_VMALL): Will invalidate both, this is
> > communicated to the TLB as SMMU_NESTED which is (SMMU_STAGE_1 |
> > SMMU_STAGE_2) which uses it as a mask.
> >
> > As far as I understand, this is compliant with the ARM
> > architecture, based on:
> > - ARM ARM DDI 0487J.a: RLGSCG, RTVTYQ, RGNJPZ
> > - ARM IHI 0070F.b: 16.2 Caching
> >
> > An alternative approach would be to instantiate 2 TLBs, one per
> > each stage. I haven’t investigated that.
> >
> > Others
> > =======
> > - Advertise SMMUv3.2-S2FWB, it is NOP for QEMU as it doesn’t support
> > attributes.
> >
> > - OAS: A typical setup with nesting is to share CPU stage-2 with the
> > SMMU, and according to the user manual, SMMU OAS must match the
> > system physical address.
> >
> > This was discussed before in
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230226220650.1480786-11-smostafa@google.com/
> > The implementation here, follows the discussion, where migration is
> > added and oas is set up from the board (virt). However, the OAS is
> > chosen based on the CPU PARANGE as there is no fixed one.
> >
> > - For nested configuration, IOVA notifier only notifies for stage-1
> > invalidations (as far as I understand this is the intended
> > behaviour as it notifies for IOVA)
> >
> > - Stop ignoring VMID for stage-1 if stage-2 is also supported.
> >
> >
> > Future improvements:
> > =====================
> > 1) One small improvement, that I don’t think it’s worth the extra
> > complexity, is in case of Stage-1 TLB miss for nested translation,
> > we can do stage-1 walk and lookup for stage-2 TLBs, instead of
> > doing the full walk.
> >
> > 2) Patch 0006 (hw/arm/smmuv3: Translate CD and TT using stage-2 table)
> > introduces a macro to use functions that rely on cfg for stage-2,
> > I don’t like it. However, I didn’t find a simple way around it,
> > either we change many functions to have a separate stage argument,
> > or add another arg in config, which is probably more code.
> >
> > Testing
> > ========
> > 1) IOMMUFD + VFIO
> > Kernel: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1683688960.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com/
> > VMM: https://qemu-devel.nongnu.narkive.com/o815DqpI/rfc-v5-0-8-arm-smmuv3-emulation-support
> >
> > By assigning “virtio-net-pci,netdev=net0,disable-legacy=on,iommu_platform=on,ats=on”,
> > to a guest VM (on top of QEMU guest) with VIFO and IOMMUFD.
> >
> > 2) Work in progress prototype I am hacking on for nesting on KVM
> > (this is nowhere near complete, and misses many stuff but it
> > doesn't require VMs/VFIO) also with virtio-net-pci and git
> > cloning a bunch of stuff and also observing traces.
> > https://android-kvm.googlesource.com/linux/+log/refs/heads/smostafa/android15-6.6-smmu-nesting-wip
> >
> > hw/arm/smmuv3: Split smmuv3_translate() better viewed with --color-moved
> >
> >
> > Mostafa Saleh (12):
> > hw/arm/smmu: Use enum for SMMU stage
> > hw/arm/smmu: Split smmuv3_translate()
> > hw/arm/smmu: Add stage to TLB
> > hw/arm/smmu: Support nesting in commands
> > hw/arm/smmuv3: Support nested SMMUs in smmuv3_notify_iova()
> > hw/arm/smmuv3: Translate CD and TT using stage-2 table
> > hw/arm/smmu-common: Support nested translation
> > hw/arm/smmuv3: Support and advertise nesting
> > hw/arm/smmuv3: Advertise S2FWB
> > hw/arm/smmu: Refactor SMMU OAS
> > hw/arm/smmuv3: Add property for OAS
> > hw/arm/virt: Set SMMU OAS based on CPU PARANGE
> >
> > hw/arm/smmu-common.c | 256 ++++++++++++++++++----
> > hw/arm/smmu-internal.h | 2 +
> > hw/arm/smmuv3-internal.h | 17 +-
> > hw/arm/smmuv3.c | 405 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > hw/arm/trace-events | 14 +-
> > hw/arm/virt.c | 14 +-
> > include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h | 46 +++-
> > include/hw/arm/smmuv3.h | 1 +
> > target/arm/cpu.h | 2 +
> > target/arm/cpu64.c | 5 +
> > 10 files changed, 533 insertions(+), 229 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.44.0.396.g6e790dbe36-goog
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-03 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-25 10:13 [RFC PATCH 00/12] SMMUv3 nested translation support Mostafa Saleh
2024-03-25 10:13 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] hw/arm/smmu: Use enum for SMMU stage Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-02 16:32 ` Eric Auger
2024-03-25 10:13 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] hw/arm/smmu: Split smmuv3_translate() Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-02 16:32 ` Eric Auger
2024-03-25 10:13 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] hw/arm/smmu: Add stage to TLB Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-02 17:15 ` Eric Auger
2024-04-02 18:47 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-03 7:22 ` Eric Auger
2024-04-03 9:55 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-03-25 10:14 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] hw/arm/smmu: Support nesting in commands Mostafa Saleh
2024-03-25 10:14 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] hw/arm/smmuv3: Support nested SMMUs in smmuv3_notify_iova() Mostafa Saleh
2024-03-25 10:14 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] hw/arm/smmuv3: Translate CD and TT using stage-2 table Mostafa Saleh
2024-03-25 10:14 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] hw/arm/smmu-common: Support nested translation Mostafa Saleh
2024-03-25 14:20 ` Julien Grall
2024-03-25 20:47 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-03-25 10:14 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] hw/arm/smmuv3: Support and advertise nesting Mostafa Saleh
2024-03-25 10:14 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] hw/arm/smmuv3: Advertise S2FWB Mostafa Saleh
2024-03-25 10:14 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] hw/arm/smmu: Refactor SMMU OAS Mostafa Saleh
2024-03-25 10:14 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] hw/arm/smmuv3: Add property for OAS Mostafa Saleh
2024-03-25 10:14 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] hw/arm/virt: Set SMMU OAS based on CPU PARANGE Mostafa Saleh
2024-03-25 17:50 ` [RFC PATCH 00/12] SMMUv3 nested translation support Marcin Juszkiewicz
2024-04-02 22:28 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-04-03 10:39 ` Mostafa Saleh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zg0xyXBXGa8_Kx6k@google.com \
--to=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=julien@xen.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.