From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: Allow anon exclusive check over hugetlb tail pages
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 10:21:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zg63YZaXqYdSLHG-@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zg6z4ZEt7rbILgl8@casper.infradead.org>
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:06:25PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 09:45:58AM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 01:05:57AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > if (PageHuge(page))
> > > page = compound_head(page);
> >
> > I would think PageHead() check would help us to avoid compound_head() on
> > heads, which should still be the majority cases iiuc (assuming page->flags
> > is already around in the cache anyway). I've no strong opinion though, as
> > I can hardly tell a difference in reality.
>
> compound_head() includes a check for PageHead(). Adding the check just
> makes things slower.
They check different fields (compound_head, offset 0x8 for the former).
Again I'm ok with either way to go and I don't expect measurable
difference.. so if you prefer this I'm happy with it too.
Andrew, could you help update with Matthew's fixup? The comment is
definitely better than what I wrote in all cases.
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-04 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-03 1:32 [PATCH 0/3] mm/gup: fixups for hugetlb gup rework series peterx
2024-04-03 1:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: Allow anon exclusive check over hugetlb tail pages peterx
2024-04-03 7:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-04 0:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-04-04 13:45 ` Peter Xu
2024-04-04 14:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-04-04 14:21 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2024-04-04 20:31 ` Andrew Morton
2024-04-04 20:36 ` Peter Xu
2024-04-03 1:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] fixup! mm/gup: handle huge pmd for follow_pmd_mask() peterx
2024-04-03 1:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] fixup! mm/arch: provide pud_pfn() fallback peterx
2024-04-03 11:06 ` [PATCH 0/3] mm/gup: fixups for hugetlb gup rework series Ryan Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zg63YZaXqYdSLHG-@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.