All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/1] bpf: fix possible file descriptor leaks in verifier
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 07:01:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZgZnNyeKSyEMxxYj@zh-lab-node-5> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf8d5e75-dc75-4f86-be60-013f7ed7c688@linux.dev>

On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 08:23:03PM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
> 
> On 3/28/24 2:56 AM, Anton Protopopov wrote:
> > The resolve_pseudo_ldimm64() function might have leaked file
> > descriptors when BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARENA was used in a program (some
> > error paths missed a corresponding fdput).
> > 
> > Fix leaks and also extract code which adds maps to env->used_maps
> > into a separate function. This simplifies code of resolve_pseudo_ldimm64
> > and makes it possible to reuse this code later.  While at it, also add a
> > verifier verbose message when the maps usage limit is reached.
> 
> Could you break this single patch into a series? For example,
> for 'to reuse this code later', refactoring the code (without
> funcitonality change) can be a separate patch, could you explain
> what do you mean reusing the code later? Do you have some plans
> to reuse the code later?

Yes, to pre-process file descriptors in attrs.fd_array (or a similar array).
See this thread https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZgWcsKZR23JIg51e@lavr/

> The fix for missing fdput() should be its own patch with
> Fixes tag below.
> 
> You can have yet another patch to enhance verifier by adding
> verbose messages.

Thanks. I will just send two fixes for fdput and the verifier message.
I will send a patch which refactors code when it is needed.

> > 
> > Fixes: 6082b6c328b5 ("bpf: Recognize addr_space_cast instruction in the verifier.")
> > Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com>
> > ---
> >   kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 150 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> >   1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
> [...]

      reply	other threads:[~2024-03-29  6:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-28  9:56 [PATCH bpf-next 1/1] bpf: fix possible file descriptor leaks in verifier Anton Protopopov
2024-03-29  3:23 ` Yonghong Song
2024-03-29  7:01   ` Anton Protopopov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZgZnNyeKSyEMxxYj@zh-lab-node-5 \
    --to=aspsk@isovalent.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.