From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] t/t7700-repack.sh: fix test breakages with `GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX=1`
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 14:45:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZgxSSKGdAicfVhGA@nand.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqr0fn4nmx.fsf@gitster.g>
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 11:37:10AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:
>
> > There are a handful of related test breakages which are found when
> > running t/t7700-repack.sh with GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX set to "1" in
> > your environment.
> >
> > Both test failures are the result of something like:
> >
> > git repack --write-midx --write-bitmap-index [...] &&
> >
> > test_path_is_file $midx &&
> > test_path_is_file $midx-$(midx_checksum $objdir).bitmap
> >
> > , where we repack instructing Git to write a new MIDX and corresponding
> > MIDX bitamp.
> >
> > The error occurs when GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX=1 is found in the
> > enviornment. This causes Git to write out a second MIDX (after
> > processing the builtin's `--write-midx` argument) which is identical to
> > the first, but does not request a bitmap (since we did not set the
> > GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX_WRITE_BITMAP variable in the environment).
>
> Doesn't it sound more like a bug, though? If a command line option
> requests something, should we still be honoring a contradicting
> instruction given by environment variable(s)?
>
> But anyway.
I have generally considered the `--write-midx` and
`GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX` options to be orthogonal to each other. The
latter is a developer-oriented option that forces Git to write a MIDX
post-repack regardless of the command-line option.
It predates the `--write-midx` option by a number of years, and IIUC was
introduced to enhance test coverage while the MIDX was being originally
developed.
I would argue that GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX should be on the list of
GIT_TEST_-variables to get rid of as it has served its purpose.
> > diff --git a/t/t7700-repack.sh b/t/t7700-repack.sh
> > index 94f9f4a1da..127efe99f8 100755
> > --- a/t/t7700-repack.sh
> > +++ b/t/t7700-repack.sh
> > @@ -629,6 +629,7 @@ test_expect_success '--write-midx with preferred bitmap tips' '
> > git log --format="create refs/tags/%s/%s %H" HEAD >refs &&
> > git update-ref --stdin <refs &&
> >
> > + GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX=0 \
> > git repack --write-midx --write-bitmap-index &&
> > test_path_is_file $midx &&
> > test_path_is_file $midx-$(midx_checksum $objdir).bitmap &&
>
> Is it a viable alternative approach to skip this check (and the
> other one) when GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX is set (i.e., lazy
> prereq). It will give us a better documentation value, e.g.,
>
> test_lazy_prereq FORCED_MIDX '
> # Features that are broken when GIT_TEST_* forces it
> # to enable are protexted with this prerequisite.
> test "$GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX" = 1;
> '
>
> test_expect_success !FORCED_MIDX '--write-midx with ...' '
> ...
> '
>
> With a single comment, we can annotate any future tests that relies
> on features working correctly even with GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX.
It's possible, but not something that I have seen done elsewhere for
this or any of the other GIT_TEST- variables.
Like I said, I'd like to get rid of this (and many other)
GIT_TEST-related variables, but that is a larger effort than this single
patch.
Thanks,
Taylor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-02 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-02 16:26 [PATCH] t/t7700-repack.sh: fix test breakages with `GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX=1` Taylor Blau
2024-04-02 18:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-02 18:45 ` Taylor Blau [this message]
2024-04-02 19:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-02 20:04 ` Taylor Blau
2024-04-02 20:24 ` Jeff King
2024-04-02 22:10 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZgxSSKGdAicfVhGA@nand.local \
--to=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.