From: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] libbpf: Add ring__consume_max / ring_buffer__consume_max
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 22:41:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZgxtZSFKddlMz3s6@gpd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzYuMxF6JDi4gG+cfikXqrOsBqiZRw8Ur4K5=YwQKAqKXg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 11:04:39AM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
...
> > + * negative number if any of the callbacks return an error.
> > + */
> > +LIBBPF_API int ring__consume_max(struct ring *r, size_t max_items);
>
> I'm bikeshedding here, of course, but I prefer `ring__consume_n` and
> max_items -> n.
I actually like "_n" more than "_max" (same with max_items -> n).
I'll change this (with all the other suggestions) and will send a new
version.
Thanks for the review!
-Andrea
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-02 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-01 7:19 [PATCH v2 0/2] libbpf: API to partially consume items from ringbuffer Andrea Righi
2024-04-01 7:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] libbpf: ringbuf: allow to consume up to a certain amount of items Andrea Righi
2024-04-02 17:58 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-02 20:37 ` Andrea Righi
2024-04-01 7:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] libbpf: Add ring__consume_max / ring_buffer__consume_max Andrea Righi
2024-04-02 18:04 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-02 20:41 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZgxtZSFKddlMz3s6@gpd \
--to=andrea.righi@canonical.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.