From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B299E171075; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 16:27:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712334443; cv=none; b=Pi+h7jWdgRdYWTGjP3OFCc/jtMFIAgouOmfeqrfcL2EpWKP80AaaiDz20d/M3EVnDvISeh6zse4Zy3JyPDfjds3f5L+658tQBF7sdkdk6D1uaAGoR8KNag2Vgolz9W58DAzJmilQ0U1kmqJ7AADFFKecw9Raw1WWgg0cm3bZMQM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712334443; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1rB3/ZAXnwJsq3eNOlhvfWEklsZnNw1TyJxUJwxJNcQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Z0EBTtdtw8e2Tz4sThYYGyW1S/wbwelXfIWzzamlu3+m1Sfa0Ai7rWFhirq0l8JZCI4hL381JRDGLcP6UnVI2rNQjqn7sNbEnliUtOwmtEfkZCGh9gaz/jgf0CSqyhPfq12eaIGNRqZa1Gp7KAmDRLkHU9OGuLMkm5DUgnyMM8Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=aM4X3W2T; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="aM4X3W2T" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1712334442; x=1743870442; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=1rB3/ZAXnwJsq3eNOlhvfWEklsZnNw1TyJxUJwxJNcQ=; b=aM4X3W2T35HjHDgj9r/XMytiT1zlGxs6IReJwG3imA5X09JuSlxzFL5z +QmrELMvqQ06Z+DBK9OO3ASGWYm1pFTOF0ATFZit3WXO5j3OYhT6ldhGQ ztplw3gY0fVmuZ6i0/yxxac/zI2o8rbhDDhgmvQ3P/CZ5fFeCv+2dS+Sd QZclPhEpeWxmg33RFZ9tNW1+ShzjuPmav4CUwm8mna+0t1H14ddSxrphC pynX4ZGKZWYBwLGQ3OfFjJmZs89YtuKcd0Yjv0Bp0qVjU4rdeuUTZytFw wX8Evl7xgLAkjHa2EPpMzVw8A89buf5Z1iN6Oweo902KRNj37HpG1uIku g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: KdhQVOP8SBGNZBIKZrwQ3g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: TSogD5UrTmimxW3dHn5H9Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11035"; a="7798137" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,181,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="7798137" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Apr 2024 09:27:21 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11035"; a="915258518" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,181,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="915258518" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Apr 2024 09:27:18 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rsmPL-00000001ndJ-49Pw; Fri, 05 Apr 2024 19:27:15 +0300 Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 19:27:15 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Cristian Marussi Cc: Sudeep Holla , Peng Fan , Linus Walleij , "Peng Fan (OSS)" , "brgl@bgdev.pl" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: pinconf-generic: check error value EOPNOTSUPP Message-ID: References: <20240401141031.3106216-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 05:23:31PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 07:16:56PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > Yes, my point was simply to say to fix the retcode of SCMI pinctrl to comply with > Pinctrl expectations, and definitely NOT to fix and move to ENOTSUPP all the SCMI > originated errors across all protocols, since it is NOT what is expected in general > by other susbsystems. Yes, that's what will work for me, thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko