From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Luca Coelho" <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] drm/i915/dmc: use struct intel_display more
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 10:31:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zh_dVoy11dTY1IaM@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <06bc9fd9d0472e899bd9d50f3b10a6066c1a0238.1713358679.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 04:02:47PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Now that the intel_de_ functions and DISPLAY_VER() accept struct
> intel_display *, use it more.
>
> Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c | 24 +++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c
> index e79c45e36722..d9864b9cc429 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c
> @@ -66,8 +66,8 @@ static void intel_dmc_wl_work(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct intel_dmc_wl *wl =
> container_of(work, struct intel_dmc_wl, work.work);
> - struct drm_i915_private *i915 =
> - container_of(wl, struct drm_i915_private, display.wl);
> + struct intel_display *display =
> + container_of(wl, struct intel_display, wl);
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&wl->lock, flags);
> @@ -76,9 +76,9 @@ static void intel_dmc_wl_work(struct work_struct *work)
> if (!refcount_read(&wl->refcount))
> goto out_unlock;
>
> - __intel_de_rmw_nowl(i915, DMC_WAKELOCK1_CTL, DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_REQ, 0);
> + __intel_de_rmw_nowl(display, DMC_WAKELOCK1_CTL, DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_REQ, 0);
>
> - if (__intel_de_wait_for_register_nowl(i915, DMC_WAKELOCK1_CTL,
> + if (__intel_de_wait_for_register_nowl(display, DMC_WAKELOCK1_CTL,
> DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_ACK, 0,
> DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_TIMEOUT)) {
> WARN_RATELIMIT(1, "DMC wakelock release timed out");
> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static bool __intel_dmc_wl_supported(struct intel_display *display)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(display->drm);
>
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) < 20 ||
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(display) < 20 ||
> !intel_dmc_has_payload(i915) ||
> !display->params.enable_dmc_wl)
> return false;
> @@ -121,11 +121,10 @@ static bool __intel_dmc_wl_supported(struct intel_display *display)
>
> void intel_dmc_wl_init(struct intel_display *display)
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(display->drm);
> struct intel_dmc_wl *wl = &display->wl;
>
> /* don't call __intel_dmc_wl_supported(), DMC is not loaded yet */
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) < 20 || !display->params.enable_dmc_wl)
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(display) < 20 || !display->params.enable_dmc_wl)
> return;
>
> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&wl->work, intel_dmc_wl_work);
> @@ -135,7 +134,6 @@ void intel_dmc_wl_init(struct intel_display *display)
>
> void intel_dmc_wl_enable(struct intel_display *display)
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(display->drm);
> struct intel_dmc_wl *wl = &display->wl;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> @@ -152,7 +150,7 @@ void intel_dmc_wl_enable(struct intel_display *display)
> * wakelock, because we're just enabling it, so call the
> * non-locking version directly here.
> */
> - __intel_de_rmw_nowl(i915, DMC_WAKELOCK_CFG, 0, DMC_WAKELOCK_CFG_ENABLE);
> + __intel_de_rmw_nowl(display, DMC_WAKELOCK_CFG, 0, DMC_WAKELOCK_CFG_ENABLE);
>
> wl->enabled = true;
> wl->taken = false;
> @@ -163,7 +161,6 @@ void intel_dmc_wl_enable(struct intel_display *display)
>
> void intel_dmc_wl_disable(struct intel_display *display)
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(display->drm);
> struct intel_dmc_wl *wl = &display->wl;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> @@ -178,7 +175,7 @@ void intel_dmc_wl_disable(struct intel_display *display)
> goto out_unlock;
>
> /* Disable wakelock in DMC */
> - __intel_de_rmw_nowl(i915, DMC_WAKELOCK_CFG, DMC_WAKELOCK_CFG_ENABLE, 0);
> + __intel_de_rmw_nowl(display, DMC_WAKELOCK_CFG, DMC_WAKELOCK_CFG_ENABLE, 0);
>
> refcount_set(&wl->refcount, 0);
> wl->enabled = false;
> @@ -190,7 +187,6 @@ void intel_dmc_wl_disable(struct intel_display *display)
>
> void intel_dmc_wl_get(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg)
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(display->drm);
> struct intel_dmc_wl *wl = &display->wl;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> @@ -219,10 +215,10 @@ void intel_dmc_wl_get(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg)
> * run yet.
> */
> if (!wl->taken) {
> - __intel_de_rmw_nowl(i915, DMC_WAKELOCK1_CTL, 0,
> + __intel_de_rmw_nowl(display, DMC_WAKELOCK1_CTL, 0,
> DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_REQ);
>
> - if (__intel_de_wait_for_register_nowl(i915, DMC_WAKELOCK1_CTL,
> + if (__intel_de_wait_for_register_nowl(display, DMC_WAKELOCK1_CTL,
> DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_ACK,
> DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_ACK,
> DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_TIMEOUT)) {
> --
> 2.39.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-17 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-17 13:02 [PATCH v4 0/9] drm/i915: better high level abstraction for display Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] drm/i915/display: add intel_display -> drm_device backpointer Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] drm/i915/display: add generic to_intel_display() macro Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] drm/i915: add generic __to_intel_display() Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] drm/i915/display: accept either i915 or display for feature tests Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 13:58 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] drm/i915/quirks: convert struct drm_i915_private to struct intel_display Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] drm/i915/display: rename __intel_wait_for_register_nowl() to indicate intel_de_ Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 13:59 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] drm/i915/dmc: convert dmc wakelock interface to struct intel_display Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 14:31 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] drm/i915/de: allow intel_display and drm_i915_private for de functions Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 14:00 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] drm/i915/dmc: use struct intel_display more Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 14:31 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-04-18 18:21 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 13:26 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915: better high level abstraction for display (rev3) Patchwork
2024-04-17 13:26 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-04-17 13:27 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-04-17 13:39 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-04-17 13:42 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-04-17 14:00 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-04-17 14:25 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-04-17 14:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning " Patchwork
2024-04-17 14:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-04-17 14:38 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-04-18 11:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2024-04-18 23:43 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zh_dVoy11dTY1IaM@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=luciano.coelho@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.