From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAC43CD11C2 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:04:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CEA0113420; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:04:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Zd/uKDuf"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.12]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3E53113420 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:04:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1712768650; x=1744304650; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=6kc2W1VhcjtOcoHxijVqQIq9BOEKyl56pmLL89QB6to=; b=Zd/uKDufrrDj0uE4cCtKvpLunzWZgP6MR3egXODyKHM+xEIws/2o9+fN Di16q5UBF60oMPuduHUYFJaOt6XbwOeDXGT465KWLLhJrvpYFzGlaaAAK zVUaNbfHw1vt2x3XOorjWyLqk4q+u/GsyfP+FgXMt17qt+qSVamSlXq// gEfNYBM7heOQwzPrs1YqROsIU6UqF7tkdc1mCEiIS1T4PRnTlUcnZWyaE ElsTnUorvE7a6kHcFFKd5wD+l5qRVZ4U1mIjUMXKR2X48GbO83et+CTuL dzGvo3UqpchNZVGeWN6tBAbhZiwrm7EciWdwDX01WaKKuinzWAvuobciO w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: oQFro6LISq+5/q1xxwWMqA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: XQGooo2aTMOROl5UejVRqg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11039"; a="11926693" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,190,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="11926693" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmvoesa106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Apr 2024 10:04:09 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11039"; a="827793204" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,190,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="827793204" Received: from stinkpipe.fi.intel.com (HELO stinkbox) ([10.237.72.74]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 10 Apr 2024 10:04:05 -0700 Received: by stinkbox (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:04:04 +0300 Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:04:04 +0300 From: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= To: Tomi Valkeinen Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Jyri Sarha Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/21] drm/tilcdc: Allow build without __iowmb() Message-ID: References: <20240408170426.9285-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> <20240408170426.9285-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Patchwork-Hint: comment X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 06:25:17PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 12:06:29PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > On 08/04/2024 20:04, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > > > __iowmb() isn't available on most architectures. Make > > > its use optional so that the driver can be built on > > > other architectures with COMPILE_TEST=y. > > > > > > Cc: Jyri Sarha > > > Cc: Tomi Valkeinen > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_regs.h | 2 ++ > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_regs.h > > > index f90e2dc3457c..44e4ada30fba 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_regs.h > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_regs.h > > > @@ -125,7 +125,9 @@ static inline void tilcdc_write64(struct drm_device *dev, u32 reg, u64 data) > > > #if defined(iowrite64) && !defined(iowrite64_is_nonatomic) > > > iowrite64(data, addr); > > > #else > > > +#ifdef __iowmb > > > __iowmb(); > > > +#endif > > > /* This compiles to strd (=64-bit write) on ARM7 */ > > > *(volatile u64 __force *)addr = __cpu_to_le64(data); > > > #endif > > > > As the memory barrier is an important part there, would it be better to > > ifdef based on COMPILE_TEST, to make it clear why it's being done? > > I can do that if you prefer. What if someone tries to actually boot a kernel built with COMPILE_TEST=y on a machine with this hardware? -- Ville Syrjälä Intel