From: Kris Van Hees <kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
To: dtrace@lists.linux.dev,
DTrace development list <dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com>
Subject: Possible (long standing) issue in the BPF verifier?
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 21:35:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zi2n0lpb7Kk15qKE@oracle.com> (raw)
So, I found the following in a BPF log on kernel 6.8.0:
BPF: 799: (bf) r4 = r6 ; frame2: R4_w=scalar(id=8,smin=smin3
2=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff)) R6_w=scalar(id=8,smin=smin3
2=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))
BPF: 800: (07) r4 += 7 ; frame2: R4_w=scalar(smin=umin=smin32=umin32=7,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=262,var_off=(0x0; 0x1ff))
BPF: 801: (57) r4 &= -8 ; frame2: R4_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=262,var_off=(0x0; 0x1f8))
And when checking kernel 6.5.0:
BPF: 791: (bf) r4 = r6 ; frame2: R4_w=scalar(id=8,umax=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff)) R6_w=scalar(id=8,umax=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))
BPF: 792: (07) r4 += 7 ; frame2: R4_w=scalar(umin=7,umax=262,var_off=(0x0; 0x1ff))
BPF: 793: (57) r4 &= -8 ; frame2: R4_w=scalar(umax=262,var_off=(0x0; 0x1f8))
And kernel 5.15.0:
BPF: 799: (bf) r4 = r6
BPF: 800: frame2: R0=inv(id=11,umin_value=1,umax_value=256,var_off=(0x0; 0x1ff)) R4_w=inv(id=12,umax_value=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff)) R6_w=inv(id=12,umax_value=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff)) R10=fp0 fp-8=map_value fp-16=inv4774451407313060418 fp-24=map_value fp-32=map_value
BPF: 800: (07) r4 += 7
BPF: 801: frame2: R0=inv(id=11,umin_value=1,umax_value=256,var_off=(0x0; 0x1ff)) R4_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=7,umax_value=262,var_off=(0x0; 0x1ff)) R6_w=inv(id=12,umax_value=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff)) R10=fp0 fp-8=map_value fp-16=inv4774451407313060418 fp-24=map_value fp-32=map_value
BPF: 801: (57) r4 &= -8
BPF: 802: frame2: R0=inv(id=11,umin_value=1,umax_value=256,var_off=(0x0; 0x1ff)) R4_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=262,var_off=(0x0; 0x1f8)) R6_w=inv(id=12,umax_value=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff)) R10=fp0 fp-8=map_value fp-16=inv4774451407313060418 fp-24=map_value fp-32=map_value
This code is supposed to round the value in %r4 up to the nearest multiple of
8. So, if %r4 is 255, one would expect this to yield 256. Yet, it does not.
next reply other threads:[~2024-04-28 1:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-28 1:35 Kris Van Hees [this message]
2024-04-29 16:42 ` Possible (long standing) issue in the BPF verifier? Eugene Loh
2024-04-29 17:22 ` Kris Van Hees
2024-04-29 18:14 ` Eugene Loh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zi2n0lpb7Kk15qKE@oracle.com \
--to=kris.van.hees@oracle.com \
--cc=dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=dtrace@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.