All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Make use of cached 'epc_features' in pci_epf_test_core_init()
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 19:49:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZiALuYlshLmwLhvu@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240417-pci-epf-test-fix-v1-1-653c911d1faa@linaro.org>

On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 10:47:25PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Instead of getting the epc_features from pci_epc_get_features() API, use
> the cached pci_epf_test::epc_features value to avoid the NULL check. Since
> the NULL check is already performed in pci_epf_test_bind(), having one more
> check in pci_epf_test_core_init() is redundant and it is not possible to
> hit the NULL pointer dereference. This also leads to the following smatch
> warning:
> 
> drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c:784 pci_epf_test_core_init()
> error: we previously assumed 'epc_features' could be null (see line 747)
> 
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/024b5826-7180-4076-ae08-57d2584cca3f@moroto.mountain/
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>

I think you forgot:
Fixes: a01e7214bef9 ("PCI: endpoint: Remove "core_init_notifier" flag")


> ---
>  drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> index 977fb79c1567..0d28f413cb07 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> @@ -743,11 +743,10 @@ static int pci_epf_test_core_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
>  	bool msi_capable = true;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	epc_features = pci_epc_get_features(epc, epf->func_no, epf->vfunc_no);
> -	if (epc_features) {
> -		msix_capable = epc_features->msix_capable;
> -		msi_capable = epc_features->msi_capable;
> -	}
> +	epc_features = epf_test->epc_features;

How about:

index 977fb79c1567..4d6105c07ac0 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
@@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ static int pci_epf_test_core_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
 {
        struct pci_epf_test *epf_test = epf_get_drvdata(epf);
        struct pci_epf_header *header = epf->header;
-       const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features;
+       const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features = epf_test->epc_features;
        struct pci_epc *epc = epf->epc;
        struct device *dev = &epf->dev;
        bool linkup_notifier = false;
@@ -743,12 +743,6 @@ static int pci_epf_test_core_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
        bool msi_capable = true;
        int ret;
 
-       epc_features = pci_epc_get_features(epc, epf->func_no, epf->vfunc_no);
-       if (epc_features) {
-               msix_capable = epc_features->msix_capable;
-               msi_capable = epc_features->msi_capable;
-       }
-
        if (epf->vfunc_no <= 1) {
                ret = pci_epc_write_header(epc, epf->func_no, epf->vfunc_no, header);
                if (ret) {
@@ -761,6 +755,7 @@ static int pci_epf_test_core_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
        if (ret)
                return ret;
 
+       msi_capable = epc_features->msi_capable;
        if (msi_capable) {
                ret = pci_epc_set_msi(epc, epf->func_no, epf->vfunc_no,
                                      epf->msi_interrupts);
@@ -770,6 +765,7 @@ static int pci_epf_test_core_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
                }
        }
 
+       msix_capable = epc_features->msix_capable;
        if (msix_capable) {
                ret = pci_epc_set_msix(epc, epf->func_no, epf->vfunc_no,
                                       epf->msix_interrupts,
@@ -814,11 +810,9 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
        void *base;
        enum pci_barno test_reg_bar = epf_test->test_reg_bar;
        enum pci_barno bar;
-       const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features;
+       const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features = epf_test->epc_features;
        size_t test_reg_size;
 
-       epc_features = epf_test->epc_features;
-
        test_reg_bar_size = ALIGN(sizeof(struct pci_epf_test_reg), 128);
 
        msix_capable = epc_features->msix_capable;


Instead?

That way, we assign msi_capable/msix_capable just before the if-statement
where it is used. (Which matches how we already assign msix_capable just
before the if-statement in pci_epf_test_alloc_space().)


Kind regards,
Niklas


> +
> +	msix_capable = epc_features->msix_capable;
> +	msi_capable = epc_features->msi_capable;
>  
>  	if (epf->vfunc_no <= 1) {
>  		ret = pci_epc_write_header(epc, epf->func_no, epf->vfunc_no, header);
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 6e47dcb2ca223211c43c37497836cd9666c70674
> change-id: 20240417-pci-epf-test-fix-2209ae22be80
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-17 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-17 17:17 [PATCH] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Make use of cached 'epc_features' in pci_epf_test_core_init() Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-17 17:49 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2024-04-17 17:54   ` Dan Carpenter
2024-04-17 17:54   ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-18  5:47     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-18  5:43   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-18  6:46     ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-18  6:53       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-18  7:14         ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-18  7:30           ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-18  7:40             ` Niklas Cassel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZiALuYlshLmwLhvu@ryzen \
    --to=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.