From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7730C4345F for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 04:49:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=CODneMgz; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VKlgM6LG6z3cTF for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:49:35 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=CODneMgz; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=139.178.84.217; helo=dfw.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=xiang@kernel.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VKlgD6lYJz3btQ for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:49:27 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF3161628; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 04:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2DAC0C113CC; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 04:49:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1713415765; bh=TEYkN7+fY+wtkfU+comhLweSMoF5TPWbSOtRU2V/7GU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=CODneMgzHR+jUd4KfSxmrtXlNfl8cqogS9qXHVWOEuStcpOFtdB5xhhsD41JmC04n 0sogZZ0kf/QZ3YiYZaVkq5szay7Tp6SlHlERDKJSazpfh8rqJJXPer0DFFL5tz1jgw njS+zTxtVl3dVPPTfOQdq5mTZ6hI1jgtb8jnaUkqxogdy81Z66DosusyDlM+dhAgIl uadzsat2Ok+0SN5WunKm62tGJicoqZbwCh9LTfSPTMYTCm6oqPoGu89uq8XFA2akk4 SoOjS4UQfvARp3X54/Rlxnydv+j4xk5szQdrT5J5qurYOEQ4GLdAtw+L+ZKAsUgPAv TQQSE6ar3jRvg== Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 12:49:23 +0800 From: Gao Xiang To: Sandeep Dhavale Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] erofs-utils: dump: print filesystem blocksize Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Sandeep Dhavale , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com, kernel-team@android.com References: <20240418000054.2769023-1-dhavale@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240418000054.2769023-1-dhavale@google.com> X-BeenThere: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Linux EROFS file system List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com, kernel-team@android.com, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linux-erofs" On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 05:00:54PM -0700, Sandeep Dhavale wrote: > mkfs.erofs supports creating filesystem images with different > blocksizes. Add filesystem blocksize in super block dump so > its easier to inspect the filesystem. > > The field is added after FS magic, so the output now looks like: > > Filesystem magic number: 0xE0F5E1E2 > Filesystem blocksize: 65536 > Filesystem blocks: 21 > Filesystem inode metadata start block: 0 > Filesystem shared xattr metadata start block: 0 > Filesystem root nid: 36 > Filesystem lz4_max_distance: 65535 > Filesystem sb_extslots: 0 > Filesystem inode count: 10 > Filesystem created: Wed Apr 17 16:53:10 2024 > Filesystem features: sb_csum mtime 0padding > Filesystem UUID: e66f6dd1-6882-48c3-9770-fee7c4841a93 > > Signed-off-by: Sandeep Dhavale Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang Thanks, Gao Xiang