All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <msnitzer@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Guangwu Zhang <guazhang@redhat.com>,
	dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] completion: move blk_wait_io to kernel/sched/completion.c
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 23:06:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZitEd_CzSgqy2Kd0@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240422105956.GN30852@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 12:59:56PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> A bit like TASK_NOLOAD (which is used to make TASK_IDLE work), but
> different I suppose.
> 
> TASK_NOHUNG would be trivial to add ofc. But is it worth it?

Yes.  And it would allow us to kill the horrible existing block hack.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-26  6:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-17 17:49 [PATCH 1/2] completion: move blk_wait_io to kernel/sched/completion.c Mikulas Patocka
2024-04-17 17:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-17 18:00   ` Mikulas Patocka
2024-04-18  4:57     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-18 14:30       ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-18 14:46         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-18 15:09           ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-22 10:59       ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-23 12:36         ` Mikulas Patocka
2024-04-26  6:06         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-04-22 10:54     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZitEd_CzSgqy2Kd0@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=guazhang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=msnitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.