All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: John Meneghini <jmeneghi@redhat.com>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
	kbusch@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me,
	emilne@redhat.com, hare@kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jrani@purestorage.com,
	randyj@purestorage.com, aviv.coro@ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] block,nvme: latency-based I/O scheduler
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 11:34:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zj3qJP_J-D3DEP6W@ryzen.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240509204324.832846-1-jmeneghi@redhat.com>

On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 04:43:21PM -0400, John Meneghini wrote:
> I'm re-issuing Hannes's latency patches in preparation for LSFMM

Hello John,

Just a small note.

Please don't reply-to the previous version of the series (v2), when sending
out a v3.

It creates "an unmanageable forest of references in email clients".

See:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#explicit-in-reply-to-headers

Instead just add the url to the v2 on lore.kernel.org.

See you at LSFMM!


Kind regards,
Niklas

> 
> Changes since V2:
> 
> I've done quite a bit of work cleaning up these patches. There were a
> number of checkpatch.pl problems as well as some compile time errors
> when config BLK_NODE_LATENCY was turned off. After the clean up I
> rebased these patches onto Ewan's "nvme: queue-depth multipath iopolicy"
> patches. This allowed me to test both iopolicy changes together. 
> 
> All of my test results, together with the scripts I used to generate these
> graphs, are available at:
> 
>   https://github.com/johnmeneghini/iopolicy
> 
> Please use the scripts in this repository to do your own testing.
> 
> Changes since V1:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> there had been several attempts to implement a latency-based I/O
> scheduler for native nvme multipath, all of which had its issues.
> 
> So time to start afresh, this time using the QoS framework
> already present in the block layer.
> It consists of two parts:
> - a new 'blk-nlatency' QoS module, which is just a simple per-node
>   latency tracker
> - a 'latency' nvme I/O policy
> 
> Using the 'tiobench' fio script with 512 byte blocksize I'm getting
> the following latencies (in usecs) as a baseline:
> - seq write: avg 186 stddev 331
> - rand write: avg 4598 stddev 7903
> - seq read: avg 149 stddev 65
> - rand read: avg 150 stddev 68
> 
> Enabling the 'latency' iopolicy:
> - seq write: avg 178 stddev 113
> - rand write: avg 3427 stddev 6703
> - seq read: avg 140 stddev 59
> - rand read: avg 141 stddev 58
> 
> Setting the 'decay' parameter to 10:
> - seq write: avg 182 stddev 65
> - rand write: avg 2619 stddev 5894
> - seq read: avg 142 stddev 57
> - rand read: avg 140 stddev 57  
> 
> That's on a 32G FC testbed running against a brd target,
> fio running with 48 threads. So promises are met: latency
> goes down, and we're even able to control the standard
> deviation via the 'decay' parameter.
> 
> As usual, comments and reviews are welcome.
> 
> Changes to the original version:
> - split the rqos debugfs entries
> - Modify commit message to indicate latency
> - rename to blk-nlatency
> 
> Hannes Reinecke (2):
>   block: track per-node I/O latency
>   nvme: add 'latency' iopolicy
> 
> John Meneghini (1):
>   nvme: multipath: pr_notice when iopolicy changes
> 
>  MAINTAINERS                   |   1 +
>  block/Kconfig                 |   9 +
>  block/Makefile                |   1 +
>  block/blk-mq-debugfs.c        |   2 +
>  block/blk-nlatency.c          | 389 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  block/blk-rq-qos.h            |   6 +
>  drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c |  73 ++++++-
>  drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h      |   1 +
>  include/linux/blk-mq.h        |  11 +
>  9 files changed, 484 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 block/blk-nlatency.c
> 
> -- 
> 2.39.3
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-10  9:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-03 14:17 [PATCHv2 0/2] block,nvme: latency-based I/O scheduler Hannes Reinecke
2024-04-03 14:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: track per-node I/O latency Hannes Reinecke
2024-04-04  2:22   ` kernel test robot
2024-04-04  2:55   ` kernel test robot
2024-04-04 18:47   ` kernel test robot
2024-04-03 14:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: add 'latency' iopolicy Hannes Reinecke
2024-04-04 21:14 ` [PATCHv2 0/2] block,nvme: latency-based I/O scheduler Keith Busch
2024-04-05  6:21   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-04-05 15:03     ` Keith Busch
2024-04-05 15:36       ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-04-07 19:55         ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-05-09 20:43 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] " John Meneghini
2024-05-10  9:34   ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2024-05-09 20:43 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] block: track per-node I/O latency John Meneghini
2024-05-10  7:11   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-05-10  9:28     ` Niklas Cassel
2024-05-10 10:00     ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-09 20:43 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] nvme: add 'latency' iopolicy John Meneghini
2024-05-10  7:17   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-05-10 10:03     ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-09 20:43 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] nvme: multipath: pr_notice when iopolicy changes John Meneghini
2024-05-10  7:19   ` Damien Le Moal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zj3qJP_J-D3DEP6W@ryzen.lan \
    --to=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=aviv.coro@ibm.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=emilne@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jmeneghi@redhat.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=jrani@purestorage.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=randyj@purestorage.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.