From: Oleg Nesterov <onestero@redhat.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: kernel/sched/isolation.c:143 housekeeping_setup() warn: always true condition '(first_cpu >= 0) => (0-u32max >= 0)'
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 04:49:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZjNToL7ARe_vfJch@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202404300915.WNvfwBz3-lkp@intel.com>
Hello,
I am on PTO till May 9 without my working laptop, can't even read the source code.
I'll return to this when I'm back. CONFIG_SMP=n I guess.
On 04/30, kernel test robot wrote:
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> head: 98369dccd2f8e16bf4c6621053af7aa4821dcf8e
> commit: 257bf89d84121280904800acd25cc2c444c717ae sched/isolation: Fix boot crash when maxcpus < first housekeeping CPU
> date: 2 days ago
> config: xtensa-randconfig-r081-20240429 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240430/202404300915.WNvfwBz3-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: xtensa-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404300915.WNvfwBz3-lkp@intel.com/
>
> New smatch warnings:
> kernel/sched/isolation.c:143 housekeeping_setup() warn: always true condition '(first_cpu >= 0) => (0-u32max >= 0)'
>
> Old smatch warnings:
> arch/xtensa/include/asm/thread_info.h:97 current_thread_info() warn: inconsistent indenting
>
> vim +143 kernel/sched/isolation.c
>
> 117
> 118 static int __init housekeeping_setup(char *str, unsigned long flags)
> 119 {
> 120 cpumask_var_t non_housekeeping_mask, housekeeping_staging;
> 121 unsigned int first_cpu;
> 122 int err = 0;
> 123
> 124 if ((flags & HK_FLAG_TICK) && !(housekeeping.flags & HK_FLAG_TICK)) {
> 125 if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)) {
> 126 pr_warn("Housekeeping: nohz unsupported."
> 127 " Build with CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL\n");
> 128 return 0;
> 129 }
> 130 }
> 131
> 132 alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&non_housekeeping_mask);
> 133 if (cpulist_parse(str, non_housekeeping_mask) < 0) {
> 134 pr_warn("Housekeeping: nohz_full= or isolcpus= incorrect CPU range\n");
> 135 goto free_non_housekeeping_mask;
> 136 }
> 137
> 138 alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&housekeeping_staging);
> 139 cpumask_andnot(housekeeping_staging,
> 140 cpu_possible_mask, non_housekeeping_mask);
> 141
> 142 first_cpu = cpumask_first_and(cpu_present_mask, housekeeping_staging);
> > 143 if (first_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids || first_cpu >= setup_max_cpus) {
> 144 __cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), housekeeping_staging);
> 145 __cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), non_housekeeping_mask);
> 146 if (!housekeeping.flags) {
> 147 pr_warn("Housekeeping: must include one present CPU, "
> 148 "using boot CPU:%d\n", smp_processor_id());
> 149 }
> 150 }
> 151
> 152 if (cpumask_empty(non_housekeeping_mask))
> 153 goto free_housekeeping_staging;
> 154
> 155 if (!housekeeping.flags) {
> 156 /* First setup call ("nohz_full=" or "isolcpus=") */
> 157 enum hk_type type;
> 158
> 159 for_each_set_bit(type, &flags, HK_TYPE_MAX)
> 160 housekeeping_setup_type(type, housekeeping_staging);
> 161 } else {
> 162 /* Second setup call ("nohz_full=" after "isolcpus=" or the reverse) */
> 163 enum hk_type type;
> 164 unsigned long iter_flags = flags & housekeeping.flags;
> 165
> 166 for_each_set_bit(type, &iter_flags, HK_TYPE_MAX) {
> 167 if (!cpumask_equal(housekeeping_staging,
> 168 housekeeping.cpumasks[type])) {
> 169 pr_warn("Housekeeping: nohz_full= must match isolcpus=\n");
> 170 goto free_housekeeping_staging;
> 171 }
> 172 }
> 173
> 174 iter_flags = flags & ~housekeeping.flags;
> 175
> 176 for_each_set_bit(type, &iter_flags, HK_TYPE_MAX)
> 177 housekeeping_setup_type(type, housekeeping_staging);
> 178 }
> 179
> 180 if ((flags & HK_FLAG_TICK) && !(housekeeping.flags & HK_FLAG_TICK))
> 181 tick_nohz_full_setup(non_housekeeping_mask);
> 182
> 183 housekeeping.flags |= flags;
> 184 err = 1;
> 185
> 186 free_housekeeping_staging:
> 187 free_bootmem_cpumask_var(housekeeping_staging);
> 188 free_non_housekeeping_mask:
> 189 free_bootmem_cpumask_var(non_housekeeping_mask);
> 190
> 191 return err;
> 192 }
> 193
>
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-02 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-30 1:41 kernel/sched/isolation.c:143 housekeeping_setup() warn: always true condition '(first_cpu >= 0) => (0-u32max >= 0)' kernel test robot
2024-05-02 8:49 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2024-05-02 9:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-22 13:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZjNToL7ARe_vfJch@redhat.com \
--to=onestero@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.