All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	javier.carrasco@wolfvision.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Select CONFIG_USB_ONBOARD_DEV as built-in
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 20:11:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZjVE_i8wAn_YDird@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5DF0UNtj1q11rYRhpRSZTxp+XLmCvOEev0d+7WO_RBERg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 07:58:57PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
> 
> On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 6:45 PM Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> wrote:
> 
> > It is also not clear to me why things would be broken with
> > CONFIG_USB=y CONFIG_USB_ONBOARD_DEV=m, but not with CONFIG_USB=m. It
> > doesn't seem to be an universal issue, I can't repro it locally.
> 
> This issue happens on an imx6q-udoo board.
> 
> multi_v7_defconfig has CONFIG_USB=y and CONFIG_USB_ONBOARD_DEV=m:
> https://storage.kernelci.org/next/master/next-20240502/arm/multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y/gcc-10/lab-broonie/baseline-imx6q-udoo.html
> 
> usb 1-1: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> usb 1-1: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> usb 1-1: new full-speed USB device number 3 using ci_hdrc
> usb 1-1: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> usb 1-1: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> usb usb1-port1: attempt power cycle
> usb 1-1: new full-speed USB device number 4 using ci_hdrc
> usb 1-1: device not accepting address 4, error -71
> usb 1-1: new full-speed USB device number 5 using ci_hdrc
> usb 1-1: device not accepting address 5, error -71
> usb usb1-port1: unable to enumerate USB device
> 
> imx_v6_v7_defconfig has CONFIG_USB=y and CONFIG_USB_ONBOARD_DEV=y:
> https://storage.kernelci.org/next/master/next-20240502/arm/imx_v6_v7_defconfig/gcc-10/lab-broonie/baseline-imx6q-udoo.html
> 
> In this case, the USB Wifi chip connected to the USB2514 hub is
> correctly detected:
> 
> usb 1-1.3: new high-speed USB device number 3 using ci_hdrc
> usb 1-1.3: New USB device found, idVendor=148f, idProduct=5370, bcdDevice= 1.01
> usb 1-1.3: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
> usb 1-1.3: Product: 802.11 n WLAN
> usb 1-1.3: Manufacturer: Ralink
> usb 1-1.3: SerialNumber: 1.0


Here are some debug logs from my side with CONFIG_USB_ONBOARD_DEV=m:

[    0.755965] DBG: hub_probe: adding onboard pdevs
[    0.756204] DBG: hub_probe: done
[    0.756618] DBG: hub_probe: adding onboard pdevs
[    0.756621] DBG: hub_probe: done
[    8.094539] DBG: onboard_dev_init
[    9.141729] DBG: onboard_dev_probe
[    9.142237] DBG: onboard_dev_probe (done)
[    9.142428] DBG: onboard_dev_init (done)

The root hub adds the onboard pdev at 0.75..., but the onboard_dev
module is only loaded more than 7s later (and probed even later). In
the meantime there are no errors of failed enumerations as seen on
the imx6q-udoo.

I wonder if the problem could be that the sense resistors of the hub
on the imx6q-udoo are always active and not only when the hub is
powered, indicating the controller the presence of a device, which
results in an attempt to enumerate it.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-03 20:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-08 14:02 [PATCH] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Select CONFIG_USB_ONBOARD_DEV as built-in Fabio Estevam
2024-04-29 22:09 ` Fabio Estevam
2024-04-30  6:28   ` Alexander Stein
2024-04-30  7:52     ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-04-30 19:53       ` Fabio Estevam
2024-04-30 20:24         ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-05-01 23:04           ` Fabio Estevam
2024-05-02 14:49             ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2024-05-02 18:37               ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-05-02 21:45                 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2024-05-02 22:58                   ` Fabio Estevam
2024-05-03 17:16                     ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2024-05-03 17:51                       ` Fabio Estevam
2024-05-03 20:11                     ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
2024-05-03 21:13                       ` Fabio Estevam
2024-05-06 14:54                         ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2024-05-06 15:04                           ` Mark Brown
2024-05-06 15:58                             ` Matthias Kaehlcke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZjVE_i8wAn_YDird@google.com \
    --to=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@denx.de \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=javier.carrasco@wolfvision.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.