From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.de>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3] Rewrite msgstress testing suite
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 13:25:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zji-Jh96mBq90dM-@yuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240503093151.29928-1-andrea.cervesato@suse.de>
Hi!
> +static void reader(const int id, const int pos)
> +{
> + int size;
> + int iter = num_iterations;
> + struct sysv_msg msg_recv;
> + struct sysv_data *buff = &ipc_data[pos];
> +
> + while (--iter >= 0 && !(*stop)) {
> + memset(&msg_recv, 0, sizeof(struct sysv_msg));
> +
> + size = SAFE_MSGRCV(id, &msg_recv, 100, MSGTYPE, 0);
> +
> + if (msg_recv.type != buff->msg.type) {
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "Received the wrong message type");
>
> - for (i = 0; i < nprocs; i++) {
> - fflush(stdout);
> - if ((pid = FORK_OR_VFORK()) < 0) {
> - tst_brkm(TFAIL,
> - NULL,
> - "\tFork failed (may be OK if under stress)");
> + *stop = 1;
> + return;
> }
> - /* Child does this */
> - if (pid == 0) {
> - procstat = 1;
> - exit(dotest(keyarray[i], i));
> +
> + if (msg_recv.data.len != buff->msg.data.len) {
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "Received the wrong message data length");
> +
> + *stop = 1;
> + return;
> }
> - pidarray[i] = pid;
> - }
>
> - count = 0;
> - while (1) {
> - if ((wait(&status)) > 0) {
> - if (status >> 8 != 0) {
> - tst_brkm(TFAIL, NULL,
> - "Child exit status = %d",
> - status >> 8);
> - }
> - count++;
> - } else {
> - if (errno != EINTR) {
> - break;
> + for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> + if (msg_recv.data.pbytes[i] != buff->msg.data.pbytes[i]) {
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "Received wrong data at index %d: %x != %x", i,
> + msg_recv.data.pbytes[i],
> + buff->msg.data.pbytes[i]);
> +
> + *stop = 1;
> + return;
> }
> -#ifdef DEBUG
> - tst_resm(TINFO, "Signal detected during wait");
> -#endif
> }
> - }
> - /* Make sure proper number of children exited */
> - if (count != nprocs) {
> - tst_brkm(TFAIL,
> - NULL,
> - "Wrong number of children exited, Saw %d, Expected %d",
> - count, nprocs);
> - }
>
> - tst_resm(TPASS, "Test ran successfully!");
> + tst_res(TDEBUG, "Received correct data");
> + tst_res(TDEBUG, "msg_recv.type = %ld", msg_recv.type);
> + tst_res(TDEBUG, "msg_recv.data.len = %d", msg_recv.data.len);
> + }
>
> - cleanup();
> - tst_exit();
> + buff->id = -1;
You can't reset the buff->id to -1 here since that will cause the test
to leak the message queues because the cleanup will not remove anything.
> }
>
> -static int dotest(key_t key, int child_process)
> +static void run(void)
> {
> - int id, pid;
> - int ret, status;
> + int id, pos;
>
> - sighold(SIGTERM);
> - TEST(msgget(key, IPC_CREAT | S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR));
> - if (TEST_RETURN < 0) {
> - printf("msgget() error in child %d: %s\n",
> - child_process, strerror(TEST_ERRNO));
> + reset_messages();
And this is even a bigger problem, with that we forget the IDs on each
iteration with -i so we will leak even more message queues, just check
ipcs output after running this test.
I can push the patch with a following diff, if you agree:
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/msgstress/msgstress01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/msgstress/msgstress01.c
index 5851938dd..5c84957b3 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/msgstress/msgstress01.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/msgstress/msgstress01.c
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
* Copyright (C) 2024 SUSE LLC Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>
*/
-/*
+/*\
* [Description]
*
* Stress test for SysV IPC. We send multiple messages at the same time,
@@ -146,8 +146,15 @@ static void reader(const int id, const int pos)
tst_res(TDEBUG, "msg_recv.type = %ld", msg_recv.type);
tst_res(TDEBUG, "msg_recv.data.len = %d", msg_recv.data.len);
}
+}
- buff->id = -1;
+static void remove_queues(void)
+{
+ for (int pos = 0; pos < num_messages; pos++) {
+ struct sysv_data *buff = &ipc_data[pos];
+ if (buff->id != -1)
+ SAFE_MSGCTL(buff->id, IPC_RMID, NULL);
+ }
}
static void run(void)
@@ -175,6 +182,7 @@ static void run(void)
}
tst_reap_children();
+ remove_queues();
if (!(*stop))
tst_res(TPASS, "Test passed. All messages have been received");
@@ -232,12 +240,7 @@ static void cleanup(void)
if (!ipc_data)
return;
- for (int pos = 0; pos < num_messages; pos++) {
- struct sysv_data *buff = &ipc_data[pos];
-
- if (buff->id != -1)
- SAFE_MSGCTL(buff->id, IPC_RMID, NULL);
- }
+ remove_queues();
SAFE_MUNMAP(ipc_data, sizeof(struct sysv_data) * num_messages);
SAFE_MUNMAP((void *)stop, sizeof(int));
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-06 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-03 9:31 [LTP] [PATCH v3] Rewrite msgstress testing suite Andrea Cervesato
2024-05-06 11:25 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2024-05-06 11:53 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2024-05-07 12:53 ` Cyril Hrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zji-Jh96mBq90dM-@yuki \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=andrea.cervesato@suse.de \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.