From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: don't include CML PCI IDs in CFL
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 09:47:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zjow5HXrXpg2cuOA@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bebbdad2decb22f3db29e6bc66746b4a05e1387b.1715086509.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 03:56:48PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> It's confusing for INTEL_CFL_IDS() to include all CML PCI IDs. Even if
> we treat them the same in a lot of places, CML is a platform of its own,
> and the lists of PCI IDs should not conflate them.
>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c | 1 +
> include/drm/i915_pciids.h | 12 +++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> index 59f4aefc6bc1..2e2d15be4025 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> @@ -547,6 +547,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id intel_early_ids[] __initconst = {
> INTEL_BXT_IDS(&gen9_early_ops),
> INTEL_KBL_IDS(&gen9_early_ops),
> INTEL_CFL_IDS(&gen9_early_ops),
> + INTEL_CML_IDS(&gen9_early_ops),
> INTEL_GLK_IDS(&gen9_early_ops),
> INTEL_CNL_IDS(&gen9_early_ops),
> INTEL_ICL_11_IDS(&gen11_early_ops),
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c
> index 56a2e17d7d9e..3aa7d1cdd228 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c
> @@ -832,6 +832,7 @@ static const struct {
> INTEL_GLK_IDS(&glk_display),
> INTEL_KBL_IDS(&skl_display),
> INTEL_CFL_IDS(&skl_display),
> + INTEL_CML_IDS(&skl_display),
> INTEL_ICL_11_IDS(&icl_display),
> INTEL_EHL_IDS(&jsl_ehl_display),
> INTEL_JSL_IDS(&jsl_ehl_display),
> diff --git a/include/drm/i915_pciids.h b/include/drm/i915_pciids.h
> index 85ce33ad6e26..5f52c504ffde 100644
> --- a/include/drm/i915_pciids.h
> +++ b/include/drm/i915_pciids.h
> @@ -472,6 +472,12 @@
> INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x9BCA, info), \
> INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x9BCC, info)
>
> +#define INTEL_CML_IDS(info) \
> + INTEL_CML_GT1_IDS(info), \
> + INTEL_CML_GT2_IDS(info), \
> + INTEL_CML_U_GT1_IDS(info), \
> + INTEL_CML_U_GT2_IDS(info)
> +
> #define INTEL_KBL_IDS(info) \
> INTEL_KBL_GT1_IDS(info), \
> INTEL_KBL_GT2_IDS(info), \
> @@ -535,11 +541,7 @@
> INTEL_WHL_U_GT1_IDS(info), \
> INTEL_WHL_U_GT2_IDS(info), \
> INTEL_WHL_U_GT3_IDS(info), \
> - INTEL_AML_CFL_GT2_IDS(info), \
> - INTEL_CML_GT1_IDS(info), \
> - INTEL_CML_GT2_IDS(info), \
> - INTEL_CML_U_GT1_IDS(info), \
> - INTEL_CML_U_GT2_IDS(info)
> + INTEL_AML_CFL_GT2_IDS(info)
Why only CML and not AML and WHL as well?
>
> /* CNL */
> #define INTEL_CNL_PORT_F_IDS(info) \
> --
> 2.39.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-07 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-07 12:56 [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915: PCI ID macro and subplatform changes Jani Nikula
2024-05-07 12:56 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: don't include CML PCI IDs in CFL Jani Nikula
2024-05-07 13:47 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-05-08 8:33 ` Jani Nikula
2024-05-08 12:38 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-05-08 10:57 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-05-08 11:45 ` Jani Nikula
2024-05-08 12:01 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-05-10 10:24 ` Jani Nikula
2024-05-10 10:34 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-05-10 11:24 ` Jani Nikula
2024-05-07 12:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: don't include RPL-U PCI IDs in RPL-P Jani Nikula
2024-05-08 12:41 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-05-07 12:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: separate RPL-U from RPL-P Jani Nikula
2024-05-08 12:46 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-05-07 12:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: simplify ULT/ULX subplatform detection Jani Nikula
2024-05-08 12:51 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-05-08 13:01 ` Jani Nikula
2024-05-08 13:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-05-07 12:56 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: make the PCI ID macros more flexible Jani Nikula
2024-05-07 13:56 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: PCI ID macro and subplatform changes Patchwork
2024-05-07 13:56 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-05-07 14:13 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zjow5HXrXpg2cuOA@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.