All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: Register cpuhp and syscore callbacks when enabling hardware
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 09:31:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZjpXeyzU46I1eu0A@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240425233951.3344485-4-seanjc@google.com>

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Register KVM's cpuhp and syscore callback when enabling virtualization
> in hardware instead of registering the callbacks during initialization,
> and let the CPU up/down framework invoke the inner enable/disable
> functions.  Registering the callbacks during initialization makes things
> more complex than they need to be, as KVM needs to be very careful about
> handling races between enabling CPUs being onlined/offlined and hardware
> being enabled/disabled.
> 
> Intel TDX support will require KVM to enable virtualization during KVM
> initialization, i.e. will add another wrinkle to things, at which point
> sorting out the potential races with kvm_usage_count would become even
> more complex.
> +static int hardware_enable_all(void)
> +{
> +	int r;
> +
> +	guard(mutex)(&kvm_lock);
> +
> +	if (kvm_usage_count++)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	r = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_KVM_ONLINE, "kvm/cpu:online",
> +			      kvm_online_cpu, kvm_offline_cpu);
> +	if (r)
> +		return r;

There's a lock ordering issue here.  KVM currently takes kvm_lock inside
cpu_hotplug_lock, but this code does the opposite.  I need to take a closer look
at the locking, as I'm not entirely certain that the existing ordering is correct
or ideal.  E.g. cpu_hotplug_lock is taken when updating static keys, static calls,
etc., which makes taking cpu_hotplug_lock outside kvm_lock dicey, as flows that
take kvm_lock then need to be very careful to never trigger seemingly innocuous
updates.

And this lockdep splat that I've now hit twice with the current implementation
suggests that cpu_hotplug_lock => kvm_lock is already unsafe/broken (I need to
re-decipher the splat; I _think_ mostly figured it out last week, but then forgot
over the weekend).


[48419.244819] ======================================================
[48419.250999] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[48419.257179] 6.9.0-smp--04b1c6b4841d-next #301 Tainted: G S         O      
[48419.264050] ------------------------------------------------------
[48419.270229] tee/27085 is trying to acquire lock:
[48419.274849] ffffb5fdd4e430a8 (&kvm->slots_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: set_nx_huge_pages+0x179/0x1e0 [kvm]
[48419.284085] 
               but task is already holding lock:
[48419.289918] ffffffffc06ccba8 (kvm_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: set_nx_huge_pages+0x14a/0x1e0 [kvm]
[48419.298386] 
               which lock already depends on the new lock.

[48419.306559] 
               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[48419.314040] 
               -> #3 (kvm_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[48419.319523]        __mutex_lock+0x6a/0xb40
[48419.323622]        mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30
[48419.328071]        kvm_dev_ioctl+0x4fb/0xe50 [kvm]
[48419.332898]        __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0
[48419.337082]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30
[48419.341357]        do_syscall_64+0x8b/0x170
[48419.345540]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x71/0x79
[48419.351115] 
               -> #2 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
[48419.357294]        cpus_read_lock+0x2e/0xb0
[48419.361480]        static_key_slow_inc+0x16/0x30
[48419.366098]        kvm_lapic_set_base+0x6a/0x1c0 [kvm]
[48419.371298]        kvm_set_apic_base+0x8f/0xe0 [kvm]
[48419.376298]        kvm_set_msr_common+0xa29/0x1080 [kvm]
[48419.381645]        vmx_set_msr+0xa54/0xbe0 [kvm_intel]
[48419.386795]        __kvm_set_msr+0xb6/0x1a0 [kvm]
[48419.391535]        kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0xf66/0x1150 [kvm]
[48419.396970]        kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x485/0x5b0 [kvm]
[48419.401881]        __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0
[48419.406067]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30
[48419.410342]        do_syscall_64+0x8b/0x170
[48419.414528]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x71/0x79
[48419.420099] 
               -> #1 (&kvm->srcu){.?.+}-{0:0}:
[48419.425758]        __synchronize_srcu+0x44/0x1a0
[48419.430378]        synchronize_srcu_expedited+0x21/0x30
[48419.435603]        kvm_swap_active_memslots+0x113/0x1c0 [kvm]
[48419.441385]        kvm_set_memslot+0x360/0x620 [kvm]
[48419.446387]        __kvm_set_memory_region+0x27b/0x300 [kvm]
[48419.452078]        kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region+0x43/0x60 [kvm]
[48419.458207]        kvm_vm_ioctl+0x295/0x650 [kvm]
[48419.462945]        __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0
[48419.467133]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30
[48419.471406]        do_syscall_64+0x8b/0x170
[48419.475590]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x71/0x79
[48419.481164] 
               -> #0 (&kvm->slots_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[48419.487343]        __lock_acquire+0x15ef/0x2e40
[48419.491876]        lock_acquire+0xe0/0x260
[48419.495977]        __mutex_lock+0x6a/0xb40
[48419.500076]        mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30
[48419.504521]        set_nx_huge_pages+0x179/0x1e0 [kvm]
[48419.509694]        param_attr_store+0x93/0x100
[48419.514142]        module_attr_store+0x22/0x40
[48419.518587]        sysfs_kf_write+0x81/0xb0
[48419.522774]        kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x133/0x1d0
[48419.527738]        vfs_write+0x317/0x380
[48419.531663]        ksys_write+0x70/0xe0
[48419.535505]        __x64_sys_write+0x1f/0x30
[48419.539777]        do_syscall_64+0x8b/0x170
[48419.543961]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x71/0x79
[48419.549534] 
               other info that might help us debug this:

[48419.557534] Chain exists of:
                 &kvm->slots_lock --> cpu_hotplug_lock --> kvm_lock

[48419.567873]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[48419.573793]        CPU0                    CPU1
[48419.578325]        ----                    ----
[48419.582859]   lock(kvm_lock);
[48419.585831]                                lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
[48419.592011]                                lock(kvm_lock);
[48419.597499]   lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
[48419.601173] 
                *** DEADLOCK ***

[48419.607090] 5 locks held by tee/27085:
[48419.610841]  #0: ffffa0dcc92eb410 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: vfs_write+0xe4/0x380
[48419.618765]  #1: ffffa0dce221ac88 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xd8/0x1d0
[48419.627553]  #2: ffffa11c4d6bef28 (kn->active#257){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xe0/0x1d0
[48419.636684]  #3: ffffffffc06e3c50 (&mod->param_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: param_attr_store+0x57/0x100
[48419.645575]  #4: ffffffffc06ccba8 (kvm_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: set_nx_huge_pages+0x14a/0x1e0 [kvm]
[48419.654564] 
               stack backtrace:
[48419.658925] CPU: 93 PID: 27085 Comm: tee Tainted: G S         O       6.9.0-smp--04b1c6b4841d-next #301
[48419.668312] Hardware name: Google Interlaken/interlaken, BIOS 0.20231025.0-0 10/25/2023
[48419.676314] Call Trace:
[48419.678770]  <TASK>
[48419.680878]  dump_stack_lvl+0x83/0xc0
[48419.684552]  dump_stack+0x14/0x20
[48419.687880]  print_circular_bug+0x2f0/0x300
[48419.692068]  check_noncircular+0x103/0x120
[48419.696163]  ? __lock_acquire+0x5e3/0x2e40
[48419.700266]  __lock_acquire+0x15ef/0x2e40
[48419.704286]  ? __lock_acquire+0x5e3/0x2e40
[48419.708387]  ? __lock_acquire+0x5e3/0x2e40
[48419.712486]  ? __lock_acquire+0x5e3/0x2e40
[48419.716586]  lock_acquire+0xe0/0x260
[48419.720164]  ? set_nx_huge_pages+0x179/0x1e0 [kvm]
[48419.725060]  ? lock_acquire+0xe0/0x260
[48419.728822]  ? param_attr_store+0x57/0x100
[48419.732921]  ? set_nx_huge_pages+0x179/0x1e0 [kvm]
[48419.737768]  __mutex_lock+0x6a/0xb40
[48419.741359]  ? set_nx_huge_pages+0x179/0x1e0 [kvm]
[48419.746207]  ? set_nx_huge_pages+0x14a/0x1e0 [kvm]
[48419.751054]  ? param_attr_store+0x57/0x100
[48419.755158]  ? __mutex_lock+0x240/0xb40
[48419.759005]  ? param_attr_store+0x57/0x100
[48419.763107]  mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30
[48419.767031]  set_nx_huge_pages+0x179/0x1e0 [kvm]
[48419.771705]  param_attr_store+0x93/0x100
[48419.775629]  module_attr_store+0x22/0x40
[48419.779556]  sysfs_kf_write+0x81/0xb0
[48419.783222]  kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x133/0x1d0
[48419.787668]  vfs_write+0x317/0x380
[48419.791084]  ksys_write+0x70/0xe0
[48419.794401]  __x64_sys_write+0x1f/0x30
[48419.798152]  do_syscall_64+0x8b/0x170
[48419.801819]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x71/0x79
[48419.806872] RIP: 0033:0x7f98eff1ee0d
[48419.810465] Code: e5 41 57 41 56 53 50 49 89 d6 49 89 f7 89 fb 48 8b 05 37 7c 07 00 83 38 00 75 28 b8 01 00 00 00 89 df 4c 89 fe 4c 89 f2 0f 05 <48> 89 c3 48 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 3a 48 89 d8 48 83 c4 08 5b 41 5e 41
[48419.829213] RSP: 002b:00007ffd5dee15c0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
[48419.836792] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000005 RCX: 00007f98eff1ee0d
[48419.843931] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 00007ffd5dee16d0 RDI: 0000000000000005
[48419.851065] RBP: 00007ffd5dee15e0 R08: 00007f98efe161d2 R09: 0000000000000001
[48419.858196] R10: 00000000000001b6 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002
[48419.865328] R13: 00007ffd5dee16d0 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 00007ffd5dee16d0
[48419.872472]  </TASK>



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-07 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-25 23:39 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: Register cpuhp/syscore callbacks when enabling virt Sean Christopherson
2024-04-25 23:39 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/reboot: Unconditionally define cpu_emergency_virt_cb typedef Sean Christopherson
2024-05-13 12:50   ` Huang, Kai
2024-05-13 16:01     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-13 22:44       ` Huang, Kai
2024-05-14 22:41         ` Huang, Kai
2024-05-21 20:02           ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-21 21:43             ` Huang, Kai
2024-05-21 23:16               ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-25 23:39 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86: Register emergency virt callback in common code, via kvm_x86_ops Sean Christopherson
2024-04-26  8:52   ` Chao Gao
2024-04-26 17:08     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-13 12:55       ` Huang, Kai
2024-05-13 16:17         ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-25 23:39 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: Register cpuhp and syscore callbacks when enabling hardware Sean Christopherson
2024-04-26  8:32   ` Chao Gao
2024-04-26 17:07     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-07 16:31   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-05-09 12:10     ` Huang, Kai
2024-05-13 12:56   ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-25 23:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: Rename functions related to enabling virtualization hardware Sean Christopherson
2024-05-13 12:59   ` Huang, Kai
2024-05-13 16:20     ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZjpXeyzU46I1eu0A@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.