All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tao Su <tao1.su@linux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, chao.gao@intel.com,
	xiaoyao.li@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: selftests: x86: Prioritize getting max_gfn from GuestPhysBits
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 13:12:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZjxbWc+qw/LRL/KY@linux.bj.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZjuHrGROhuBylm4x@google.com>

On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 07:09:48AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2024, Tao Su wrote:
> > Use the max mappable GPA via GuestPhysBits advertised by KVM to calculate
> > max_gfn. Currently some selftests (e.g. access_tracking_perf_test,
> > dirty_log_test...) add RAM regions close to max_gfn, so guest may access
> > GPA beyond its mappable range and cause infinite loop.
> > 
> > Prioritize obtaining pa_bits from the GuestPhysBits field advertised by
> > KVM, so max_gfn can be limited to the mappable range.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tao Su <tao1.su@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > This patch is based on https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/b628cb523c65
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h | 1 +
> >  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c     | 4 +++-
> >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
> > index 81ce37ec407d..ff99f66d81a0 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
> > @@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_cpu_property {
> >  #define X86_PROPERTY_MAX_EXT_LEAF		KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x80000000, 0, EAX, 0, 31)
> >  #define X86_PROPERTY_MAX_PHY_ADDR		KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x80000008, 0, EAX, 0, 7)
> >  #define X86_PROPERTY_MAX_VIRT_ADDR		KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x80000008, 0, EAX, 8, 15)
> > +#define X86_PROPERTY_MAX_GUEST_PHY_ADDR		KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x80000008, 0, EAX, 16, 23)
> >  #define X86_PROPERTY_SEV_C_BIT			KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x8000001F, 0, EBX, 0, 5)
> >  #define X86_PROPERTY_PHYS_ADDR_REDUCTION	KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x8000001F, 0, EBX, 6, 11)
> >  
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
> > index 74a4c736c9ae..6c69f1dfeed2 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
> > @@ -1074,7 +1074,9 @@ void kvm_get_cpu_address_width(unsigned int *pa_bits, unsigned int *va_bits)
> >  		*pa_bits = kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAE) ? 36 : 32;
> >  		*va_bits = 32;
> >  	} else {
> > -		*pa_bits = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_MAX_PHY_ADDR);
> > +		*pa_bits = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_MAX_GUEST_PHY_ADDR);
> > +		if (*pa_bits == 0)
> > +			*pa_bits = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_MAX_PHY_ADDR);
> 
> This is the wrong place to incorporaate the max mappable GPA.  The pa_bits field
> should reflect the "real" MAXPHYADDR, it's vm->max_gfn that needs to be adjusted,
> and x86 selftests already overrides vm_compute_max_gfn() specifically to deal with
> goofy edge cases like this.

Thanks for pointing out! I will adjust max_gfn in the vm_compute_max_gfn() overrided
by x86 selftests.

> 
> >  		*va_bits = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_MAX_VIRT_ADDR);
> >  	}
> >  }
> > 
> > base-commit: dccb07f2914cdab2ac3a5b6c98406f765acab803
> > -- 
> > 2.34.1
> > 

      reply	other threads:[~2024-05-09  5:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-08  6:42 [PATCH] KVM: selftests: x86: Prioritize getting max_gfn from GuestPhysBits Tao Su
2024-05-08 14:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-09  5:12   ` Tao Su [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZjxbWc+qw/LRL/KY@linux.bj.intel.com \
    --to=tao1.su@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.