All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>,
	neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org, joel@joelfernandes.org,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu/nocb: Fix using smp_processor_id() in preemptible warning
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 17:18:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZkOAtN9SgTuuVXXT@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d2a9a579-ffcf-4812-a857-2f091f7c65b5@paulmck-laptop>

Le Tue, May 14, 2024 at 07:54:40AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney a écrit :
> On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 03:40:46PM +0800, Zqiang wrote:
> > Currently, the this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data) in rcu_rdp_is_offloaded() is called
> > before the condition "!(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT) && preemptible())"
> > is checked, and occurs in preemptible task context, this will trigger the
> > following warning.
> > 
> > [ 4.106221][ T18] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: rcuop/0/18
> > [ 4.107796][ T18] caller is debug_smp_processor_id (lib/smp_processor_id.c:61)
> > [ 4.108547][ T18] CPU: 0 PID: 18 Comm: rcuop/0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2-00079-g4c66bc7cacc0 #1
> > [ 4.109667][ T18] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
> > [ 4.111064][ T18] Call Trace:
> > [ 4.111064][ T18]  <TASK>
> > [ 4.111064][ T18] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:116)
> > [ 4.111064][ T18] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:124)
> > [ 4.111064][ T18] check_preemption_disabled (arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:84 (discriminator 15) lib/smp_processor_id.c:53 (discriminator 15))
> > [ 4.111064][ T18] debug_smp_processor_id (lib/smp_processor_id.c:61)
> > [ 4.111064][ T18] rcu_rdp_is_offloaded (kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:27 (discriminator 1))
> > [ 4.111064][ T18] nocb_cb_wait (kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h:936 (discriminator 2))
> > [ 4.111064][ T18] rcu_nocb_cb_kthread (kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h:983 (discriminator 1))
> > [ 4.111064][ T18] ? nocb_cb_wait (kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h:976)
> > [ 4.111064][ T18] kthread (kernel/kthread.c:388)
> > [ 4.111064][ T18] ? kthread (kernel/kthread.c:373 (discriminator 2))
> > [ 4.111064][ T18] ? kthread_complete_and_exit (kernel/kthread.c:341)
> > [ 4.111064][ T18] ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:153)
> > [ 4.111064][ T18] ? kthread_complete_and_exit (kernel/kthread.c:341)
> > [ 4.111064][ T18] ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:256)
> > [ 4.111064][ T18]  </TASK>
> > 
> > This commit fix this warning by priority check the condition 
> > "!(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT) && preemptible())" , to
> > ensure whether the this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data) can be executed in
> > rcu_rdp_is_offloaded().
> > 
> > Fixes: 8feeeba60711 ("rcu/nocb: Use kthread parking instead of ad-hoc implementation")
> > Tested-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>
> 
> Hearing no objections, I have queued this wordsmithed version.  As always,
> please let me know if I have messed anything up.
> 
> 							Thanx, Paul
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> commit 5271ad1de0fbcf0bd9caebcf721670c164e5fa9c
> Author: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>
> Date:   Thu May 9 15:40:46 2024 +0800
> 
>     rcu/nocb: Don't use smp_processor_id() in preemptible code
>     
>     Currently, rcu_rdp_is_offloaded() invokes this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data) before
>     the condition "!(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT) && preemptible())"
>     is checked.  When invoked in preemptible context in preemptible kernels,
>     this will trigger the following warning:
>     
>     [ 4.106221][ T18] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: rcuop/0/18
>     [ 4.107796][ T18] caller is debug_smp_processor_id (lib/smp_processor_id.c:61)
>     [ 4.108547][ T18] CPU: 0 PID: 18 Comm: rcuop/0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2-00079-g4c66bc7cacc0 #1
>     [ 4.109667][ T18] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
>     [ 4.111064][ T18] Call Trace:
>     [ 4.111064][ T18]  <TASK>
>     [ 4.111064][ T18] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:116)
>     [ 4.111064][ T18] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:124)
>     [ 4.111064][ T18] check_preemption_disabled (arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:84 (discriminator 15) lib/smp_processor_id.c:53 (discriminator 15))
>     [ 4.111064][ T18] debug_smp_processor_id (lib/smp_processor_id.c:61)
>     [ 4.111064][ T18] rcu_rdp_is_offloaded (kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:27 (discriminator 1))
>     [ 4.111064][ T18] nocb_cb_wait (kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h:936 (discriminator 2))
>     [ 4.111064][ T18] rcu_nocb_cb_kthread (kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h:983 (discriminator 1))
>     [ 4.111064][ T18] ? nocb_cb_wait (kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h:976)
>     [ 4.111064][ T18] kthread (kernel/kthread.c:388)
>     [ 4.111064][ T18] ? kthread (kernel/kthread.c:373 (discriminator 2))
>     [ 4.111064][ T18] ? kthread_complete_and_exit (kernel/kthread.c:341)
>     [ 4.111064][ T18] ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:153)
>     [ 4.111064][ T18] ? kthread_complete_and_exit (kernel/kthread.c:341)
>     [ 4.111064][ T18] ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:256)
>     [ 4.111064][ T18]  </TASK>
>     
>     This commit therefore fixes this warning by checking the condition
>     "!(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT) && preemptible())" before invoking
>     this_cpu_ptr(), thus avoiding preemptible invocations.
>     
>     Fixes: 8feeeba60711 ("rcu/nocb: Use kthread parking instead of ad-hoc implementation")
>     Tested-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-14 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-09  7:40 [PATCH] rcu/nocb: Fix using smp_processor_id() in preemptible warning Zqiang
2024-05-14 14:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-05-14 15:18   ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2024-05-14 16:53     ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZkOAtN9SgTuuVXXT@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.