All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
	Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] block: change rq_integrity_vec to respect the iterator
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 16:14:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZkXAfmbtXzKGaouC@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c366231-e146-5a2b-1d8a-5936fb2047ca@redhat.com>

On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 03:28:11PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> If we allocate a bio that is larger than NVMe maximum request size, attach
> integrity metadata to it and send it to the NVMe subsystem, the integrity
> metadata will be corrupted.
> 
> Splitting the bio works correctly. The function bio_split will clone the
> bio, trim the iterator of the first bio and advance the iterator of the
> second bio.
> 
> However, the function rq_integrity_vec has a bug - it returns the first
> vector of the bio's metadata and completely disregards the metadata
> iterator that was advanced when the bio was split. Thus, the second bio
> uses the same metadata as the first bio and this leads to metadata
> corruption.

Wrt. NVMe, inside blk_mq_submit_bio(), bio_integrity_prep() is called after
bio is split, ->bi_integrity is actually allocated for every split bio, so I
am not sure if the issue is related with bio splitting. Or is it related
with DM over NVMe?

However, rq_integrity_vec() may not work correctly in case of bio merge.


Thanks, 
Ming


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-16  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-15 13:27 [RFC PATCH 0/2] dm-crypt support for per-sector NVMe metadata Mikulas Patocka
2024-05-15 13:28 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] block: change rq_integrity_vec to respect the iterator Mikulas Patocka
2024-05-16  2:30   ` Jens Axboe
2024-05-20 12:53     ` Mikulas Patocka
2024-05-23 14:58     ` [PATCH v2] " Mikulas Patocka
2024-05-23 15:01       ` Jens Axboe
2024-05-23 15:11         ` Mikulas Patocka
2024-05-23 15:22           ` Anuj gupta
2024-05-23 15:33           ` Jens Axboe
2024-05-23 15:48             ` Mikulas Patocka
2024-05-16  8:14   ` Ming Lei [this message]
2024-05-20 12:42     ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] " Mikulas Patocka
2024-05-20 13:19       ` Ming Lei
2024-05-15 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] dm-crypt: support per-sector NVMe metadata Mikulas Patocka
2024-05-27 22:12 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] dm-crypt support for " Eric Wheeler
2024-05-28  7:25   ` Milan Broz
2024-05-28 23:55     ` Eric Wheeler
2024-05-28 11:16   ` Mikulas Patocka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZkXAfmbtXzKGaouC@fedora \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=gmazyland@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.