All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Alejandro Vallejo <alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com>
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Anthony PERARD <anthony@xenproject.org>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] tools/xg: Clean up xend-style overrides for CPU policies
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 17:02:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zktl8zRt1kue5vA6@macbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d397ec0de4138e32feeb910f3401a6568a75035e.1715954111.git.alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com>

On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 05:08:35PM +0100, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> Factor out policy getters/setters from both (CPUID and MSR) policy override
> functions. Additionally, use host policy rather than featureset when
> preparing the cur policy, saving one hypercall and several lines of
> boilerplate.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Vallejo <alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com>
> ---
> v2:
>   * Cosmetic change to comment (// into /**/).
>   * Added missing null pointer check to MSR override function.
> ---
>  tools/libs/guest/xg_cpuid_x86.c | 445 ++++++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 130 insertions(+), 315 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/libs/guest/xg_cpuid_x86.c b/tools/libs/guest/xg_cpuid_x86.c
> index 4f4b86b59470..74bca0e65b69 100644
> --- a/tools/libs/guest/xg_cpuid_x86.c
> +++ b/tools/libs/guest/xg_cpuid_x86.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,34 @@ enum {
>  #define bitmaskof(idx)      (1u << ((idx) & 31))
>  #define featureword_of(idx) ((idx) >> 5)
>  
> +static int deserialize_policy(xc_interface *xch, xc_cpu_policy_t *policy)
> +{
> +    uint32_t err_leaf = -1, err_subleaf = -1, err_msr = -1;
> +    int rc;
> +
> +    rc = x86_cpuid_copy_from_buffer(&policy->policy, policy->leaves,
> +                                    policy->nr_leaves, &err_leaf, &err_subleaf);
> +    if ( rc )
> +    {
> +        if ( err_leaf != -1 )
> +            ERROR("Failed to deserialise CPUID (err leaf %#x, subleaf %#x) (%d = %s)",
> +                  err_leaf, err_subleaf, -rc, strerror(-rc));
> +        return rc;
> +    }
> +
> +    rc = x86_msr_copy_from_buffer(&policy->policy, policy->msrs,
> +                                  policy->nr_msrs, &err_msr);
> +    if ( rc )
> +    {
> +        if ( err_msr != -1 )
> +            ERROR("Failed to deserialise MSR (err MSR %#x) (%d = %s)",
> +                  err_msr, -rc, strerror(-rc));
> +        return rc;
> +    }
> +
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
>  int xc_get_cpu_levelling_caps(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t *caps)
>  {
>      struct xen_sysctl sysctl = {};
> @@ -260,102 +288,34 @@ static int compare_leaves(const void *l, const void *r)
>      return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static xen_cpuid_leaf_t *find_leaf(
> -    xen_cpuid_leaf_t *leaves, unsigned int nr_leaves,
> -    const struct xc_xend_cpuid *xend)
> +static xen_cpuid_leaf_t *find_leaf(xc_cpu_policy_t *p,
> +                                   const struct xc_xend_cpuid *xend)
>  {
>      const xen_cpuid_leaf_t key = { xend->leaf, xend->subleaf };
>  
> -    return bsearch(&key, leaves, nr_leaves, sizeof(*leaves), compare_leaves);
> +    return bsearch(&key, p->leaves, ARRAY_SIZE(p->leaves),
> +                   sizeof(*p->leaves), compare_leaves);
>  }
>  
> -static int xc_cpuid_xend_policy(
> -    xc_interface *xch, uint32_t domid, const struct xc_xend_cpuid *xend)
> +static int xc_cpuid_xend_policy(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t domid,
> +                                const struct xc_xend_cpuid *xend,
> +                                xc_cpu_policy_t *host,
> +                                xc_cpu_policy_t *def,
> +                                xc_cpu_policy_t *cur)
>  {
> -    int rc;
> -    bool hvm;
> -    xc_domaininfo_t di;
> -    unsigned int nr_leaves, nr_msrs;
> -    uint32_t err_leaf = -1, err_subleaf = -1, err_msr = -1;
> -    /*
> -     * Three full policies.  The host, default for the domain type,
> -     * and domain current.
> -     */
> -    xen_cpuid_leaf_t *host = NULL, *def = NULL, *cur = NULL;
> -    unsigned int nr_host, nr_def, nr_cur;
> -
> -    if ( (rc = xc_domain_getinfo_single(xch, domid, &di)) < 0 )
> -    {
> -        PERROR("Failed to obtain d%d info", domid);
> -        rc = -errno;
> -        goto fail;
> -    }
> -    hvm = di.flags & XEN_DOMINF_hvm_guest;
> -
> -    rc = xc_cpu_policy_get_size(xch, &nr_leaves, &nr_msrs);
> -    if ( rc )
> -    {
> -        PERROR("Failed to obtain policy info size");
> -        rc = -errno;
> -        goto fail;
> -    }
> -
> -    rc = -ENOMEM;
> -    if ( (host = calloc(nr_leaves, sizeof(*host))) == NULL ||
> -         (def  = calloc(nr_leaves, sizeof(*def)))  == NULL ||
> -         (cur  = calloc(nr_leaves, sizeof(*cur)))  == NULL )
> -    {
> -        ERROR("Unable to allocate memory for %u CPUID leaves", nr_leaves);
> -        goto fail;
> -    }
> -
> -    /* Get the domain's current policy. */
> -    nr_msrs = 0;
> -    nr_cur = nr_leaves;
> -    rc = get_domain_cpu_policy(xch, domid, &nr_cur, cur, &nr_msrs, NULL);
> -    if ( rc )
> -    {
> -        PERROR("Failed to obtain d%d current policy", domid);
> -        rc = -errno;
> -        goto fail;
> -    }
> -
> -    /* Get the domain type's default policy. */
> -    nr_msrs = 0;
> -    nr_def = nr_leaves;
> -    rc = get_system_cpu_policy(xch, hvm ? XEN_SYSCTL_cpu_policy_hvm_default
> -                                        : XEN_SYSCTL_cpu_policy_pv_default,
> -                               &nr_def, def, &nr_msrs, NULL);
> -    if ( rc )
> -    {
> -        PERROR("Failed to obtain %s def policy", hvm ? "hvm" : "pv");
> -        rc = -errno;
> -        goto fail;
> -    }
> -
> -    /* Get the host policy. */
> -    nr_msrs = 0;
> -    nr_host = nr_leaves;
> -    rc = get_system_cpu_policy(xch, XEN_SYSCTL_cpu_policy_host,
> -                               &nr_host, host, &nr_msrs, NULL);
> -    if ( rc )
> -    {
> -        PERROR("Failed to obtain host policy");
> -        rc = -errno;
> -        goto fail;
> -    }
> +    if ( !xend )
> +        return 0;
>  
> -    rc = -EINVAL;
>      for ( ; xend->leaf != XEN_CPUID_INPUT_UNUSED; ++xend )
>      {
> -        xen_cpuid_leaf_t *cur_leaf = find_leaf(cur, nr_cur, xend);
> -        const xen_cpuid_leaf_t *def_leaf = find_leaf(def, nr_def, xend);
> -        const xen_cpuid_leaf_t *host_leaf = find_leaf(host, nr_host, xend);
> +        xen_cpuid_leaf_t *cur_leaf = find_leaf(cur, xend);
> +        const xen_cpuid_leaf_t *def_leaf = find_leaf(def, xend);
> +        const xen_cpuid_leaf_t *host_leaf = find_leaf(host, xend);
>  
>          if ( cur_leaf == NULL || def_leaf == NULL || host_leaf == NULL )
>          {
>              ERROR("Missing leaf %#x, subleaf %#x", xend->leaf, xend->subleaf);
> -            goto fail;
> +            return -EINVAL;
>          }
>  
>          for ( unsigned int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(xend->policy); i++ )
> @@ -384,7 +344,7 @@ static int xc_cpuid_xend_policy(
>                  {
>                      ERROR("Bad character '%c' in policy[%d] string '%s'",
>                            xend->policy[i][j], i, xend->policy[i]);
> -                    goto fail;
> +                    return -EINVAL;
>                  }
>  
>                  clear_bit(31 - j, cur_reg);
> @@ -394,25 +354,7 @@ static int xc_cpuid_xend_policy(
>          }
>      }
>  
> -    /* Feed the transformed currrent policy back up to Xen. */
> -    rc = xc_set_domain_cpu_policy(xch, domid, nr_cur, cur, 0, NULL,
> -                                  &err_leaf, &err_subleaf, &err_msr);
> -    if ( rc )
> -    {
> -        PERROR("Failed to set d%d's policy (err leaf %#x, subleaf %#x, msr %#x)",
> -               domid, err_leaf, err_subleaf, err_msr);
> -        rc = -errno;
> -        goto fail;
> -    }
> -
> -    /* Success! */
> -
> - fail:
> -    free(cur);
> -    free(def);
> -    free(host);
> -
> -    return rc;
> +    return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int compare_msr(const void *l, const void *r)
> @@ -426,107 +368,37 @@ static int compare_msr(const void *l, const void *r)
>      return lhs->idx < rhs->idx ? -1 : 1;
>  }
>  
> -static xen_msr_entry_t *find_msr(
> -    xen_msr_entry_t *msrs, unsigned int nr_msrs,
> -    uint32_t index)
> +static xen_msr_entry_t *find_msr(xc_cpu_policy_t *p,
> +                                 uint32_t index)
>  {
>      const xen_msr_entry_t key = { .idx = index };
>  
> -    return bsearch(&key, msrs, nr_msrs, sizeof(*msrs), compare_msr);
> +    return bsearch(&key, p->msrs, ARRAY_SIZE(p->msrs),
> +                   sizeof(*p->msrs), compare_msr);
>  }
>  
> -
>  static int xc_msr_policy(xc_interface *xch, domid_t domid,
> -                         const struct xc_msr *msr)
> +                         const struct xc_msr *msr,
> +                         xc_cpu_policy_t *host,
> +                         xc_cpu_policy_t *def,

host and def should likely be const?

> +                         xc_cpu_policy_t *cur)
>  {
> -    int rc;
> -    bool hvm;
> -    xc_domaininfo_t di;
> -    unsigned int nr_leaves, nr_msrs;
> -    uint32_t err_leaf = -1, err_subleaf = -1, err_msr = -1;
> -    /*
> -     * Three full policies.  The host, default for the domain type,
> -     * and domain current.
> -     */
> -    xen_msr_entry_t *host = NULL, *def = NULL, *cur = NULL;
> -    unsigned int nr_host, nr_def, nr_cur;
> -
> -    if ( (rc = xc_domain_getinfo_single(xch, domid, &di)) < 0 )
> -    {
> -        PERROR("Failed to obtain d%d info", domid);
> -        rc = -errno;
> -        goto out;
> -    }
> -    hvm = di.flags & XEN_DOMINF_hvm_guest;
> -
> -    rc = xc_cpu_policy_get_size(xch, &nr_leaves, &nr_msrs);
> -    if ( rc )
> -    {
> -        PERROR("Failed to obtain policy info size");
> -        rc = -errno;
> -        goto out;
> -    }
> -
> -    if ( (host = calloc(nr_msrs, sizeof(*host))) == NULL ||
> -         (def  = calloc(nr_msrs, sizeof(*def)))  == NULL ||
> -         (cur  = calloc(nr_msrs, sizeof(*cur)))  == NULL )
> -    {
> -        ERROR("Unable to allocate memory for %u CPUID leaves", nr_leaves);
> -        rc = -ENOMEM;
> -        goto out;
> -    }
> -
> -    /* Get the domain's current policy. */
> -    nr_leaves = 0;
> -    nr_cur = nr_msrs;
> -    rc = get_domain_cpu_policy(xch, domid, &nr_leaves, NULL, &nr_cur, cur);
> -    if ( rc )
> -    {
> -        PERROR("Failed to obtain d%d current policy", domid);
> -        rc = -errno;
> -        goto out;
> -    }
> -
> -    /* Get the domain type's default policy. */
> -    nr_leaves = 0;
> -    nr_def = nr_msrs;
> -    rc = get_system_cpu_policy(xch, hvm ? XEN_SYSCTL_cpu_policy_hvm_default
> -                                        : XEN_SYSCTL_cpu_policy_pv_default,
> -                               &nr_leaves, NULL, &nr_def, def);
> -    if ( rc )
> -    {
> -        PERROR("Failed to obtain %s def policy", hvm ? "hvm" : "pv");
> -        rc = -errno;
> -        goto out;
> -    }
> -
> -    /* Get the host policy. */
> -    nr_leaves = 0;
> -    nr_host = nr_msrs;
> -    rc = get_system_cpu_policy(xch, XEN_SYSCTL_cpu_policy_host,
> -                               &nr_leaves, NULL, &nr_host, host);
> -    if ( rc )
> -    {
> -        PERROR("Failed to obtain host policy");
> -        rc = -errno;
> -        goto out;
> -    }
> +    if ( !msrs )

Does this build?  Where is 'msrs' defined in this context?  The
function parameter is 'msr' AFAICT.

> +        return 0;

Should we also check for host, def, cur != NULL also?

>  
>      for ( ; msr->index != XC_MSR_INPUT_UNUSED; ++msr )
>      {
> -        xen_msr_entry_t *cur_msr = find_msr(cur, nr_cur, msr->index);
> -        const xen_msr_entry_t *def_msr = find_msr(def, nr_def, msr->index);
> -        const xen_msr_entry_t *host_msr = find_msr(host, nr_host, msr->index);
> -        unsigned int i;
> +        xen_msr_entry_t *cur_msr = find_msr(cur, msr->index);
> +        const xen_msr_entry_t *def_msr = find_msr(def, msr->index);
> +        const xen_msr_entry_t *host_msr = find_msr(host, msr->index);
>  
>          if ( cur_msr == NULL || def_msr == NULL || host_msr == NULL )
>          {
>              ERROR("Missing MSR %#x", msr->index);
> -            rc = -ENOENT;
> -            goto out;
> +            return -ENOENT;
>          }
>  
> -        for ( i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(msr->policy) - 1; i++ )
> +        for ( size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(msr->policy) - 1; i++ )
>          {
>              bool val;
>  
> @@ -542,8 +414,7 @@ static int xc_msr_policy(xc_interface *xch, domid_t domid,
>              {
>                  ERROR("MSR index %#x: bad character '%c' in policy string '%s'",
>                        msr->index, msr->policy[i], msr->policy);
> -                rc = -EINVAL;
> -                goto out;
> +                return -EINVAL;
>              }
>  
>              if ( val )
> @@ -553,25 +424,7 @@ static int xc_msr_policy(xc_interface *xch, domid_t domid,
>          }
>      }
>  
> -    /* Feed the transformed policy back up to Xen. */
> -    rc = xc_set_domain_cpu_policy(xch, domid, 0, NULL, nr_cur, cur,
> -                                  &err_leaf, &err_subleaf, &err_msr);
> -    if ( rc )
> -    {
> -        PERROR("Failed to set d%d's policy (err leaf %#x, subleaf %#x, msr %#x)",
> -               domid, err_leaf, err_subleaf, err_msr);
> -        rc = -errno;
> -        goto out;
> -    }
> -
> -    /* Success! */
> -
> - out:
> -    free(cur);
> -    free(def);
> -    free(host);
> -
> -    return rc;
> +    return 0;
>  }
>  
>  int xc_cpuid_apply_policy(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t domid, bool restore,
> @@ -583,14 +436,16 @@ int xc_cpuid_apply_policy(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t domid, bool restore,
>      int rc;
>      bool hvm;
>      xc_domaininfo_t di;
> -    struct xc_cpu_policy *p = xc_cpu_policy_init();
> -    unsigned int i, nr_leaves = ARRAY_SIZE(p->leaves), nr_msrs = 0;
> -    uint32_t err_leaf = -1, err_subleaf = -1, err_msr = -1;
> -    uint32_t host_featureset[FEATURESET_NR_ENTRIES] = {};
> -    uint32_t len = ARRAY_SIZE(host_featureset);
>  
> -    if ( !p )
> -        return -ENOMEM;
> +    struct xc_cpu_policy *host = xc_cpu_policy_init();
> +    struct xc_cpu_policy *def = xc_cpu_policy_init();

I would be helpful to have some kind of mechanism to allocate + init a
policy at the same time, so that the resulting object could be made
const here.  (Not that you need to do it in this patch).

> +    struct xc_cpu_policy *cur = xc_cpu_policy_init();
> +
> +    if ( !host || !def || !cur )
> +    {
> +        rc = -ENOMEM;
> +        goto out;
> +    }
>  
>      if ( (rc = xc_domain_getinfo_single(xch, domid, &di)) < 0 )
>      {
> @@ -600,21 +455,19 @@ int xc_cpuid_apply_policy(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t domid, bool restore,
>      }
>      hvm = di.flags & XEN_DOMINF_hvm_guest;
>  
> -    /* Get the host policy. */
> -    rc = xc_get_cpu_featureset(xch, XEN_SYSCTL_cpu_featureset_host,
> -                               &len, host_featureset);
> -    /* Tolerate "buffer too small", as we've got the bits we need. */
> -    if ( rc && errno != ENOBUFS )
> +    /* Get the raw host policy */
> +    rc = xc_cpu_policy_get_system(xch, XEN_SYSCTL_cpu_policy_host, host);
> +    if ( rc )
>      {
> -        PERROR("Failed to obtain host featureset");
> +        PERROR("Failed to obtain host policy");
>          rc = -errno;
>          goto out;
>      }
>  
>      /* Get the domain's default policy. */
> -    rc = get_system_cpu_policy(xch, hvm ? XEN_SYSCTL_cpu_policy_hvm_default
> -                                        : XEN_SYSCTL_cpu_policy_pv_default,
> -                               &nr_leaves, p->leaves, &nr_msrs, NULL);
> +    rc = xc_cpu_policy_get_system(xch, hvm ? XEN_SYSCTL_cpu_policy_hvm_default
> +                                           : XEN_SYSCTL_cpu_policy_pv_default,
> +                                  def);
>      if ( rc )
>      {
>          PERROR("Failed to obtain %s default policy", hvm ? "hvm" : "pv");
> @@ -622,14 +475,8 @@ int xc_cpuid_apply_policy(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t domid, bool restore,
>          goto out;
>      }
>  
> -    rc = x86_cpuid_copy_from_buffer(&p->policy, p->leaves, nr_leaves,
> -                                    &err_leaf, &err_subleaf);
> -    if ( rc )
> -    {
> -        ERROR("Failed to deserialise CPUID (err leaf %#x, subleaf %#x) (%d = %s)",
> -              err_leaf, err_subleaf, -rc, strerror(-rc));
> -        goto out;
> -    }
> +    /* Copy the deserialised default policy to modify it */
> +    memcpy(cur, def, sizeof(*cur));
>  
>      if ( restore )
>      {
> @@ -647,18 +494,18 @@ int xc_cpuid_apply_policy(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t domid, bool restore,
>           * - Re-enable features which have become (possibly) off by default.
>           */
>  
> -        p->policy.basic.rdrand = test_bit(X86_FEATURE_RDRAND, host_featureset);
> -        p->policy.feat.hle = test_bit(X86_FEATURE_HLE, host_featureset);
> -        p->policy.feat.rtm = test_bit(X86_FEATURE_RTM, host_featureset);
> +        cur->policy.basic.rdrand = host->policy.basic.rdrand;
> +        cur->policy.feat.hle = host->policy.feat.hle;
> +        cur->policy.feat.rtm = host->policy.feat.rtm;
>  
>          if ( hvm )
>          {
> -            p->policy.feat.mpx = test_bit(X86_FEATURE_MPX, host_featureset);
> +            cur->policy.feat.mpx = host->policy.feat.mpx;
>          }
>  
> -        p->policy.basic.max_leaf = min(p->policy.basic.max_leaf, 0xdu);
> -        p->policy.feat.max_subleaf = 0;
> -        p->policy.extd.max_leaf = min(p->policy.extd.max_leaf, 0x8000001c);
> +        cur->policy.basic.max_leaf = min(cur->policy.basic.max_leaf, 0xdu);
> +        cur->policy.feat.max_subleaf = 0;
> +        cur->policy.extd.max_leaf = min(cur->policy.extd.max_leaf, 0x8000001c);
>      }
>  
>      if ( featureset )
> @@ -666,7 +513,7 @@ int xc_cpuid_apply_policy(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t domid, bool restore,
>          uint32_t disabled_features[FEATURESET_NR_ENTRIES],
>              feat[FEATURESET_NR_ENTRIES] = {};
>          static const uint32_t deep_features[] = INIT_DEEP_FEATURES;
> -        unsigned int i, b;
> +        unsigned int b;
>  
>          /*
>           * The user supplied featureset may be shorter or longer than
> @@ -677,14 +524,14 @@ int xc_cpuid_apply_policy(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t domid, bool restore,
>  
>          /* Check for truncated set bits. */
>          rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -        for ( i = user_len; i < nr_features; ++i )
> +        for ( size_t i = user_len; i < nr_features; ++i )
>              if ( featureset[i] != 0 )
>                  goto out;
>  
>          memcpy(feat, featureset, sizeof(*featureset) * user_len);
>  
>          /* Disable deep dependencies of disabled features. */
> -        for ( i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(disabled_features); ++i )
> +        for ( size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(disabled_features); ++i )
>              disabled_features[i] = ~feat[i] & deep_features[i];
>  
>          for ( b = 0; b < sizeof(disabled_features) * CHAR_BIT; ++b )
> @@ -695,24 +542,24 @@ int xc_cpuid_apply_policy(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t domid, bool restore,
>                   !(dfs = x86_cpu_policy_lookup_deep_deps(b)) )
>                  continue;
>  
> -            for ( i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(disabled_features); ++i )
> +            for ( size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(disabled_features); ++i )

All this loop index type changes could be done as a separate patch,
you are not even touching the surrounding lines.  It adds a lot of
churn to this patch for no reason IMO.

>              {
>                  feat[i] &= ~dfs[i];
>                  disabled_features[i] &= ~dfs[i];
>              }
>          }
>  
> -        x86_cpu_featureset_to_policy(feat, &p->policy);
> +        x86_cpu_featureset_to_policy(feat, &cur->policy);
>      }
>      else
>      {
> -        p->policy.extd.itsc = itsc;
> +        cur->policy.extd.itsc = itsc;
>  
>          if ( hvm )
>          {
> -            p->policy.basic.pae = pae;
> -            p->policy.basic.vmx = nested_virt;
> -            p->policy.extd.svm = nested_virt;
> +            cur->policy.basic.pae = pae;
> +            cur->policy.basic.vmx = nested_virt;
> +            cur->policy.extd.svm = nested_virt;
>          }
>      }
>  
> @@ -722,8 +569,8 @@ int xc_cpuid_apply_policy(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t domid, bool restore,
>           * On hardware without CPUID Faulting, PV guests see real topology.
>           * As a consequence, they also need to see the host htt/cmp fields.
>           */
> -        p->policy.basic.htt       = test_bit(X86_FEATURE_HTT, host_featureset);
> -        p->policy.extd.cmp_legacy = test_bit(X86_FEATURE_CMP_LEGACY, host_featureset);
> +        cur->policy.basic.htt       = host->policy.basic.htt;
> +        cur->policy.extd.cmp_legacy = host->policy.extd.cmp_legacy;
>      }
>      else
>      {
> @@ -731,28 +578,28 @@ int xc_cpuid_apply_policy(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t domid, bool restore,
>           * Topology for HVM guests is entirely controlled by Xen.  For now, we
>           * hardcode APIC_ID = vcpu_id * 2 to give the illusion of no SMT.
>           */
> -        p->policy.basic.htt = true;
> -        p->policy.extd.cmp_legacy = false;
> +        cur->policy.basic.htt = true;
> +        cur->policy.extd.cmp_legacy = false;
>  
>          /*
>           * Leaf 1 EBX[23:16] is Maximum Logical Processors Per Package.
>           * Update to reflect vLAPIC_ID = vCPU_ID * 2, but make sure to avoid
>           * overflow.
>           */
> -        if ( !p->policy.basic.lppp )
> -            p->policy.basic.lppp = 2;
> -        else if ( !(p->policy.basic.lppp & 0x80) )
> -            p->policy.basic.lppp *= 2;
> +        if ( !cur->policy.basic.lppp )
> +            cur->policy.basic.lppp = 2;
> +        else if ( !(cur->policy.basic.lppp & 0x80) )
> +            cur->policy.basic.lppp *= 2;
>  
> -        switch ( p->policy.x86_vendor )
> +        switch ( cur->policy.x86_vendor )
>          {
>          case X86_VENDOR_INTEL:
> -            for ( i = 0; (p->policy.cache.subleaf[i].type &&
> -                          i < ARRAY_SIZE(p->policy.cache.raw)); ++i )
> +            for ( size_t i = 0; (cur->policy.cache.subleaf[i].type &&
> +                                i < ARRAY_SIZE(cur->policy.cache.raw)); ++i )
>              {
> -                p->policy.cache.subleaf[i].cores_per_package =
> -                    (p->policy.cache.subleaf[i].cores_per_package << 1) | 1;
> -                p->policy.cache.subleaf[i].threads_per_cache = 0;
> +                cur->policy.cache.subleaf[i].cores_per_package =
> +                    (cur->policy.cache.subleaf[i].cores_per_package << 1) | 1;
> +                cur->policy.cache.subleaf[i].threads_per_cache = 0;
>              }
>              break;
>  
> @@ -772,49 +619,45 @@ int xc_cpuid_apply_policy(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t domid, bool restore,
>               * apic_id_size values greater than 7.  Limit the value to
>               * 7 for now.
>               */
> -            if ( p->policy.extd.nc < 0x7f )
> +            if ( cur->policy.extd.nc < 0x7f )
>              {
> -                if ( p->policy.extd.apic_id_size != 0 && p->policy.extd.apic_id_size < 0x7 )
> -                    p->policy.extd.apic_id_size++;
> +                if ( cur->policy.extd.apic_id_size != 0 && cur->policy.extd.apic_id_size < 0x7 )

I would split the line while there, it's overly long.

Thanks, Roger.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-20 15:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-17 16:08 [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean the policy manipulation path in domain creation Alejandro Vallejo
2024-05-17 16:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] tools/xg: Streamline cpu policy serialise/deserialise calls Alejandro Vallejo
2024-05-20 13:47   ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-05-22 15:14     ` Alejandro Vallejo
2024-05-17 16:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] tools/xg: Clean up xend-style overrides for CPU policies Alejandro Vallejo
2024-05-20 15:02   ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2024-05-22 15:15     ` Alejandro Vallejo
2024-05-20 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean the policy manipulation path in domain creation Roger Pau Monné
2024-05-22 15:34   ` Alejandro Vallejo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zktl8zRt1kue5vA6@macbook \
    --to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com \
    --cc=anthony@xenproject.org \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.