From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: cve@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-cve-announce@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: CVE-2024-36000: mm/hugetlb: fix missing hugetlb_lock for resv uncharge
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 17:14:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zkto8rbtAUBql-78@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2024052023-CVE-2024-36000-cfc4@gregkh>
Peter,
does b76b46902c2d ("mm/hugetlb: fix missing hugetlb_lock for resv
uncharge") really have any security implications? I fail to see any but
UFFD is not really my area so I might be missing something very easily.
On Mon 20-05-24 11:48:36, Greg KH wrote:
> Description
> ===========
>
> In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
>
> mm/hugetlb: fix missing hugetlb_lock for resv uncharge
>
> There is a recent report on UFFDIO_COPY over hugetlb:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/000000000000ee06de0616177560@google.com/
>
> 350: lockdep_assert_held(&hugetlb_lock);
>
> Should be an issue in hugetlb but triggered in an userfault context, where
> it goes into the unlikely path where two threads modifying the resv map
> together. Mike has a fix in that path for resv uncharge but it looks like
> the locking criteria was overlooked: hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio_rsvd()
> will update the cgroup pointer, so it requires to be called with the lock
> held.
>
> The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-36000 to this issue.
>
>
> Affected and fixed versions
> ===========================
>
> Issue introduced in 5.10 with commit 79aa925bf239 and fixed in 6.1.91 with commit 4c806333efea
> Issue introduced in 5.10 with commit 79aa925bf239 and fixed in 6.6.30 with commit f6c5d21db16a
> Issue introduced in 5.10 with commit 79aa925bf239 and fixed in 6.8.9 with commit 538faabf31e9
> Issue introduced in 5.10 with commit 79aa925bf239 and fixed in 6.9 with commit b76b46902c2d
> Issue introduced in 5.9.7 with commit f87004c0b2bd
>
> Please see https://www.kernel.org for a full list of currently supported
> kernel versions by the kernel community.
>
> Unaffected versions might change over time as fixes are backported to
> older supported kernel versions. The official CVE entry at
> https://cve.org/CVERecord/?id=CVE-2024-36000
> will be updated if fixes are backported, please check that for the most
> up to date information about this issue.
>
>
> Affected files
> ==============
>
> The file(s) affected by this issue are:
> mm/hugetlb.c
>
>
> Mitigation
> ==========
>
> The Linux kernel CVE team recommends that you update to the latest
> stable kernel version for this, and many other bugfixes. Individual
> changes are never tested alone, but rather are part of a larger kernel
> release. Cherry-picking individual commits is not recommended or
> supported by the Linux kernel community at all. If however, updating to
> the latest release is impossible, the individual changes to resolve this
> issue can be found at these commits:
> https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4c806333efea1000a2a9620926f560ad2e1ca7cc
> https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6c5d21db16a0910152ec8aa9d5a7aed72694505
> https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/538faabf31e9c53d8c870d114846fda958a0de10
> https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b76b46902c2d0395488c8412e1116c2486cdfcb2
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-20 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-20 9:48 CVE-2024-36000: mm/hugetlb: fix missing hugetlb_lock for resv uncharge Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-05-20 15:14 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2024-05-21 19:38 ` Peter Xu
2024-05-23 7:30 ` Michal Hocko
2024-05-23 10:33 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-23 13:08 ` Michal Hocko
2024-05-23 15:42 ` Peter Xu
2024-06-14 11:48 ` Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zkto8rbtAUBql-78@tiehlicka \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=cve@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-cve-announce@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.