Re: perf FTBFS due to -Werror with gcc 14.1.1

[Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>]

Hello,

On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 09:58:20PM +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> On Dienstag, 4. Juni 2024 15:45:52 MESZ Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 01:40:19PM +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > > Hey all,
> > > 
> > > I cannot build the acme perf/core branch on Arch anymore with gcc 14.1.1
> > > and
> > perf/core isn't being updated for quite a while, we nowadays update just
> > the perf-tools (current merge window) and perf-tools-next (next merge
> > window/devel).
> > 
> > Also I still keep my tree uptodate when I'm updating those branches, but
> > nowadays the trees/branches to be used are:
> > 
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools.git
> > perf-tools
> > 
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git
> > perf-tools-next
> > 
> > As Namhyung Kim is a perf tools co-maintainer and keeps one of these
> > trees+branch while I keep the other.
> > 
> > Right now I'm taking care of perf-tools while Namhyung is managing
> > perf-tools.next.
> 
> Ah indeed that's it, thank you!
> 
> Which one of the two would you recommend for interested parties that want to 
> keep track of perf tools development, i.e. what was perf/core?

The perf-tools-next is for new development (previously perf/core) and the
perf-tools is for fixes in the current cycles (previously perf/urgent).

Thanks,
Namhyung