From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com
Cc: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mctp pcc: Check before sending MCTP PCC response ACK
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 10:07:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zl2H7QVuu0WDlFOS@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240528191823.17775-2-admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com>
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 03:18:21PM -0400, admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com wrote:
> From: Adam Young <admiyo@amperecomputing.com>
>
> Type 4 PCC channels have an option to send back a response
> to the platform when they are done processing the request.
> The flag to indicate whether or not to respond is inside
> the message body, and thus is not available to the pcc
> mailbox. Since only one message can be processed at once per
> channel, the value of this flag is checked during message processing
> and passed back via the channels global structure.
>
> Ideally, the mailbox callback function would return a value
> indicating whether the message requires an ACK, but that
> would be a change to the mailbox API. That would involve
> some change to all (about 12) of the mailbox based drivers,
> and the majority of them would not need to know about the
> ACK call.
>
I don't have all the 3 patches. Is this sent by error or am I expected
to just review this patch while other 2 are not mailbox related ?
> Signed-off-by: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com>
> ---
> drivers/mailbox/pcc.c | 5 ++++-
> include/acpi/pcc.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c b/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
> index 94885e411085..774727b89693 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
> @@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pcc_mbox_irq(int irq, void *p)
> {
> struct pcc_chan_info *pchan;
> struct mbox_chan *chan = p;
> + struct pcc_mbox_chan *pmchan;
> u64 val;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -304,6 +305,8 @@ static irqreturn_t pcc_mbox_irq(int irq, void *p)
> if (pcc_chan_reg_read_modify_write(&pchan->plat_irq_ack))
> return IRQ_NONE;
>
> + pmchan = &pchan->chan;
> + pmchan->ack_rx = true; //TODO default to False
We need to remove this and detect when it can be true if the default expected
is false.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-03 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-13 17:35 [PATCH 0/3] MCTP over PCC admiyo
2024-05-13 17:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] mctp pcc: Implement MCTP over PCC Transport admiyo
2024-05-13 18:31 ` Simon Horman
2024-05-13 20:08 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-05-13 20:17 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-05-13 20:22 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-05-14 5:24 ` Jeremy Kerr
2024-05-14 10:12 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-14 11:36 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-14 16:29 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-29 13:10 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-29 14:56 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-13 17:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] mctp pcc: Allow PCC Data Type in MCTP resource admiyo
2024-05-13 20:23 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-05-13 17:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] mctp pcc: RFC Check before sending MCTP PCC response ACK admiyo
2024-05-13 20:26 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-05-28 19:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] MCTP over PCC admiyo
2024-05-28 19:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mctp pcc: Check before sending MCTP PCC response ACK admiyo
2024-05-29 3:26 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2024-06-03 9:07 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2024-05-28 19:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mctp pcc: Allow PCC Data Type in MCTP resource admiyo
2024-05-29 3:25 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2024-05-30 16:24 ` Adam Young
2024-05-28 19:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mctp pcc: Implement MCTP over PCC Transport admiyo
2024-05-29 2:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-29 3:30 ` Jeremy Kerr
2024-05-30 23:51 ` Adam Young
2024-05-29 3:02 ` Jeremy Kerr
2024-06-03 17:53 ` Adam Young
2024-06-04 1:15 ` Jeremy Kerr
2024-05-29 13:21 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-29 14:03 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-07 7:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] MCTP over PCC John Chung
2024-06-19 20:05 ` admiyo
2024-06-19 20:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mctp pcc: Check before sending MCTP PCC response ACK admiyo
2024-06-19 20:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mctp pcc: Allow PCC Data Type in MCTP resource admiyo
2024-06-19 20:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mctp pcc: Implement MCTP over PCC Transport admiyo
2024-06-19 23:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-20 3:24 ` Adam Young
2024-06-20 13:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-20 11:05 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-20 15:13 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-20 3:10 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] MCTP over PCC Adam Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zl2H7QVuu0WDlFOS@bogus \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.