From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB417167268; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:43:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717631016; cv=none; b=FRglhpm0LCNxmRNWWgXrvBSxeTU7j75n0liCs0BeGNyq8CQPX4P+drdh4QV3x8zy8FxnmrlEOEFAmX0sJjSzmGTSH1QeUAf9ECJjyWxxgdseoD5kFumndPOTQBe+RSEZhD9HteBR2LtC2K72eGabfqfEp2hJy+5uGFd0VsuP+oM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717631016; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0ud6l2igzijZx0fQ1jd+W6Ev3SzXM4c1ja8Gr1TgFA0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Il7oyemehmnFhDgT6lfsPimNKv3x/1/KYR4rzJ3tRaxRRS8gBrmD4dfnPy3AG1IvIDRfGvSNl6Srk/NxR0UxNeeK8MhcJ+4XTbeM64nnPQoCuvVGMSKlnmBTBZ+BawF16dUoWG9r6DpYqvau2sNfuHcuyDrhN/6fgoBbDGDnMR8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=JyV8OtzV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="JyV8OtzV" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1717631015; x=1749167015; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=0ud6l2igzijZx0fQ1jd+W6Ev3SzXM4c1ja8Gr1TgFA0=; b=JyV8OtzVO/0vIrnVrfSH9TB/b+gK3c/mHfoE1E+7Io1QZGnARgF6x3hV /EntjNdH1cH9Y43fyAt3N/IrocDbqYQCpfV9BMUXEJ0bQftxlf2tc2wKS ES7LeLjS64oyedqd9vAs3yXBl69lJscGL1vV5mB4RtR+PKnLssZEaE7jB 5rWg29lyzRm1jY79pYJ3tna9N3WJWQQU91n3huQERC0je0NfDQ2eSlkwP aAY4+iJuJ6vUUoYfqHkCjSN8sP1aTvCA53SvNJc27q9ePoIjEijQc4Kh7 OJanva6AlhOVy7B5M94zjSv2BQ5yRNCKPjEdS/ffgoY5nVHfKFzDmMxwh A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: vMYxptj5TMiY26gkPl+XOA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: V9ITPsM6ToaTI1E1hE9DiQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11094"; a="14228835" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,218,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="14228835" Received: from fmviesa001.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.141]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Jun 2024 16:43:34 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Fpw+NY5LSYuGMklnF0P44Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: K0nD0fU7SkOXNfmYfWlfJQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,218,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="68907948" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmviesa001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Jun 2024 16:43:32 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1sF0Hx-0000000E06p-0Ci9; Thu, 06 Jun 2024 02:43:29 +0300 Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:43:28 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Danny Kaehn Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Benjamin Tissoires , Jiri Kosina , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Torokhov , Bartosz Golaszewski , Ethan Twardy Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/4] HID: usbhid: Share USB device firmware node with child HID device Message-ID: References: <20240605-cp2112-dt-v11-0-d55f0f945a62@plexus.com> <20240605-cp2112-dt-v11-2-d55f0f945a62@plexus.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-input@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240605-cp2112-dt-v11-2-d55f0f945a62@plexus.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 06:12:45PM -0500, Danny Kaehn wrote: > USB HID core now shares its fwnode with its child HID device. > Since there can only be one HID device on a USB interface, it is redundant > to specify a hid node under the USB device. This allows usb HID device > drivers to be described in firmware and make use of device properties. Can this patch be applied already, so we don't drag it again and again? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko