All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: "Csókás, Bence" <csokas.bence@prolan.hu>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sfp: Always call `sfp_sm_mod_remove()` on remove
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 16:31:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZmHWbBheKycKjigC@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24a48e5a-efb3-4066-af6f-69f4a254b9c3@lunn.ch>

On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 05:21:45PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 10:42:51AM +0200, Csókás, Bence wrote:
> > If the module is in SFP_MOD_ERROR, `sfp_sm_mod_remove()` will
> > not be run. As a consequence, `sfp_hwmon_remove()` is not getting
> > run either, leaving a stale `hwmon` device behind. `sfp_sm_mod_remove()`
> > itself checks `sfp->sm_mod_state` anyways, so this check was not
> > really needed in the first place.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: "Csókás, Bence" <csokas.bence@prolan.hu>
> 
> I was expecting Russell to review this. Maybe he missed it.

I haven't missed it, I just haven't had the time to review and respond.
Work stuff is still very busy. I know this has been going on for well
over a month, but as it's partly coming from my employer and partly due
to medical stuff taking hours out of my working week, there's nothing
much I can do about it. I'm doing the best I can, but I know that I
can't keep up with what people expect of me at the moment.

I've had to tell Kory that I won't be able to review and test his
patch series - it's just totally impossible for me to be near the
hardware I need to test with his series _and_ have the time to do so.
I feel bad about that, because it's addressing the issue I raised a
number of years ago with PTP, yet I don't have the time to be involved
in that right now.

It's frustrating for me that I'm not able to do everything that I'd like
to...

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-06-06 15:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-05  8:42 [PATCH] net: sfp: Always call `sfp_sm_mod_remove()` on remove Csókás, Bence
2024-06-06 15:21 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-06-06 15:28   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-06 16:15     ` Andrew Lunn
2024-06-06 15:31   ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2024-06-07  1:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZmHWbBheKycKjigC@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=csokas.bence@prolan.hu \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.