From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: YangYang <yang.yang@vivo.com>
Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sbitmap: fix io hung due to race on sbitmap_word::cleared
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 23:48:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZmHaQCOpje/6qQPZ@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <35bd4fe6-5ed0-4446-8fab-f86909212e60@vivo.com>
On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 04:55:17PM +0800, YangYang wrote:
> On 2024/6/4 14:12, Yu Kuai wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 在 2024/06/04 11:25, Ming Lei 写道:
> > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 11:12 AM Yang Yang <yang.yang@vivo.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Configuration for sbq:
> > > > depth=64, wake_batch=6, shift=6, map_nr=1
> > > >
> > > > 1. There are 64 requests in progress:
> > > > map->word = 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
> > > > 2. After all the 64 requests complete, and no more requests come:
> > > > map->word = 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, map->cleared = 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
> > > > 3. Now two tasks try to allocate requests:
> > > > T1: T2:
> > > > __blk_mq_get_tag .
> > > > __sbitmap_queue_get .
> > > > sbitmap_get .
> > > > sbitmap_find_bit .
> > > > sbitmap_find_bit_in_word .
> > > > __sbitmap_get_word -> nr=-1 __blk_mq_get_tag
> > > > sbitmap_deferred_clear __sbitmap_queue_get
> > > > /* map->cleared=0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF */ sbitmap_find_bit
> > > > if (!READ_ONCE(map->cleared)) sbitmap_find_bit_in_word
> > > > return false; __sbitmap_get_word -> nr=-1
> > > > mask = xchg(&map->cleared, 0) sbitmap_deferred_clear
> > > > atomic_long_andnot() /* map->cleared=0 */
> > > > if (!(map->cleared))
> > > > return false;
> > > > /*
> > > > * map->cleared is cleared by T1
> > > > * T2 fail to acquire the tag
> > > > */
> > > >
> > > > 4. T2 is the sole tag waiter. When T1 puts the tag, T2 cannot be woken
> > > > up due to the wake_batch being set at 6. If no more requests come, T1
> > > > will wait here indefinitely.
> > > >
> > > > To fix this issue, simply revert commit 661d4f55a794 ("sbitmap:
> > > > remove swap_lock"), which causes this issue.
> > >
> > > I'd suggest to add the following words in commit log:
> > >
> > > Check on ->cleared and update on both ->cleared and ->word need to be
> > > done atomically, and using spinlock could be the simplest solution.
> > >
> > > Otherwise, the patch looks fine for me.
> >
> > Maybe I'm noob, but I'm confused how can this fix the problem, looks
> > like the race condition doesn't change.
> >
> > In sbitmap_find_bit_in_word:
> >
> > 1) __sbitmap_get_word read word;
> > 2) sbitmap_deferred_clear clear cleared;
> > 3) sbitmap_deferred_clear update word;
> >
> > 2) and 3) are done atomically while 1) can still concurrent with 3):
> >
> > t1:
> > sbitmap_find_bit_in_word
> > __sbitmap_get_word
> > -> read old word, return -1
> > t2:
> > sbitmap_find_bit_in_word
> > __sbitmap_get_word
> > -> read old word, return -1
> > sbitmap_deferred_clear
> > -> clear cleared and update word
> > sbitmap_deferred_clear
> > -> cleared is cleared, fail
> >
> > BYW, I still think it's fine to fix this problem by trying the
> > __sbitmap_get_word() at least one more time if __sbitmap_get_word()
> > failed.
>
> How about this one:
> 1. Add extra check in sbitmap_find_bit_in_word() referenced from
> Yu kuai's suggestion.
> 2. Change from atomic_long_andnot to atomic_long_fetch_andnot_release
>
> ---
> include/linux/sbitmap.h | 5 +++++
> lib/sbitmap.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sbitmap.h b/include/linux/sbitmap.h
> index d662cf136021..ec0b0e73c906 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sbitmap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sbitmap.h
> @@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ struct sbitmap_word {
> * @cleared: word holding cleared bits
> */
> unsigned long cleared ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> +
> + /**
> + * @swap_lock: Held while swapping word <-> cleared
> + */
> + spinlock_t swap_lock;
> } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
>
> /**
> diff --git a/lib/sbitmap.c b/lib/sbitmap.c
> index 1e453f825c05..63dadf91e40b 100644
> --- a/lib/sbitmap.c
> +++ b/lib/sbitmap.c
> @@ -63,9 +63,13 @@ static inline void update_alloc_hint_after_get(struct sbitmap *sb,
> static inline bool sbitmap_deferred_clear(struct sbitmap_word *map)
> {
> unsigned long mask;
> + bool ret = false;
> + unsigned long flags;
>
> - if (!READ_ONCE(map->cleared))
> - return false;
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&map->swap_lock, flags);
> +
> + if (!map->cleared)
> + goto out_unlock;
>
> /*
> * First get a stable cleared mask, setting the old mask to 0.
> @@ -75,9 +79,12 @@ static inline bool sbitmap_deferred_clear(struct sbitmap_word *map)
> /*
> * Now clear the masked bits in our free word
> */
> - atomic_long_andnot(mask, (atomic_long_t *)&map->word);
> + atomic_long_fetch_andnot_release(mask, (atomic_long_t *)&map->word);
> BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(atomic_long_t) != sizeof(map->word));
> - return true;
> + ret = true;
> +out_unlock:
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&map->swap_lock, flags);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> int sbitmap_init_node(struct sbitmap *sb, unsigned int depth, int shift,
> @@ -85,6 +92,7 @@ int sbitmap_init_node(struct sbitmap *sb, unsigned int depth, int shift,
> bool alloc_hint)
> {
> unsigned int bits_per_word;
> + int i;
>
> if (shift < 0)
> shift = sbitmap_calculate_shift(depth);
> @@ -116,6 +124,9 @@ int sbitmap_init_node(struct sbitmap *sb, unsigned int depth, int shift,
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> + for (i = 0; i < sb->map_nr; i++)
> + spin_lock_init(&sb->map[i].swap_lock);
> +
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sbitmap_init_node);
> @@ -175,11 +186,13 @@ static int sbitmap_find_bit_in_word(struct sbitmap_word *map,
> int nr;
>
> do {
> + unsigned long cleared = READ_ONCE(map->cleared);
> +
->cleared is stored in standalone cacheline, the above line adds one extra l1
load, so I still prefer to check ->word & ->cleared in sbitmap_deferred_clear().
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-06 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-04 3:11 [PATCH v2] sbitmap: fix io hung due to race on sbitmap_word::cleared Yang Yang
2024-06-04 3:25 ` Ming Lei
2024-06-04 6:12 ` Yu Kuai
2024-06-04 7:03 ` YangYang
2024-06-07 12:59 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-06-11 12:53 ` YangYang
2024-06-12 0:51 ` Ming Lei
2024-06-06 3:12 ` Ming Lei
2024-06-06 7:21 ` YangYang
2024-06-06 9:02 ` Ming Lei
2024-06-06 9:20 ` YangYang
2024-06-06 8:55 ` YangYang
2024-06-06 15:48 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2024-06-07 4:23 ` YangYang
2024-06-04 6:38 ` YangYang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZmHaQCOpje/6qQPZ@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yang.yang@vivo.com \
--cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.