All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>,
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	 <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] drm/i915: PREEMPT_RT related fixups.
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 18:25:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZmjOw7m1X0EvRDBu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240611151426.cRRDv0cq@linutronix.de>

On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 05:14:26PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2024-06-11 14:06:00 [+0100], Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Sebastian,
> Hi Tvrtko,
> 
> > Previous CI results have unfortunately expired by now. I have tried
> > re-queuing it but it also does not apply any longer so I'm afraid you will
> > have to respin before anyone can see the results.
> 
> No worries, I rebased it for latest RT release, I can respost them.
> 
> > And this is not to say that I can promise someone will look at it or when.
> > Maybe Jani you could ask for volunteers regarding the display related
> > patches (head of the series) and Rodrigo you about the GuC change in 9/10?
> 
> 9/10 looks easy but okay.

That is indeed the obvious place.

> I'm going to Cc Jani for series and hope for
> the best.
> 2/10 is needed for the XE driver since it shares code with i915. 

I believe you meant patch 1 right?
We are trying to eliminate the
#if I915
for the shared display code with Xe... we probably need to think
more deeply about that.

> It
> seems fine otherwise. I can post them one-by-one if this makes it easier
> for CI. Patches like 2/10 or 8/10 should make no impact on CI.
> 
> Thank you for the sign of life ;)
> 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Tvrtko
> 
> Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-11 22:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-05 14:18 [PATCH 00/10] drm/i915: PREEMPT_RT related fixups Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-05 14:18 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Use preempt_disable/enable_rt() where recommended Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-05 14:18 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: Don't disable interrupts on PREEMPT_RT during atomic updates Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-05 14:18 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915: Don't check for atomic context on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-05 14:18 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: Disable tracing points " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-05 14:18 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: skip DRM_I915_LOW_LEVEL_TRACEPOINTS with NOTRACE Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-08 17:06   ` Steven Rostedt
2024-04-09 11:06     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-09 15:55       ` Steven Rostedt
2024-04-10 11:08         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-10 14:09           ` Steven Rostedt
2024-04-05 14:18 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/gt: Queue and wait for the irq_work item Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-05 14:18 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915/gt: Use spin_lock_irq() instead of local_irq_disable() + spin_lock() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-05 14:18 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: Drop the irqs_disabled() check Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-05 14:18 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915/guc: Consider also RCU depth in busy loop Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-11 22:18   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-05 14:18 ` [PATCH 10/10] Revert "drm/i915: Depend on !PREEMPT_RT." Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-05 15:09 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: PREEMPT_RT related fixups. (rev5) Patchwork
2024-04-05 15:09 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-04-05 15:15 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-04-05 17:16 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for drm/i915: PREEMPT_RT related fixups Patchwork
2024-04-05 18:46 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: PREEMPT_RT related fixups. (rev5) Patchwork
2024-04-10 11:35 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: PREEMPT_RT related fixups. (rev6) Patchwork
2024-04-10 11:35 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-04-10 11:58 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for drm/i915: PREEMPT_RT related fixups. (rev2) Patchwork
2024-04-10 12:02 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: PREEMPT_RT related fixups. (rev6) Patchwork
2024-04-10 22:16 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2024-06-05 10:01 ` [PATCH 00/10] drm/i915: PREEMPT_RT related fixups Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-11 13:06   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2024-06-11 15:14     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-11 22:25       ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-06-13  8:36         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-10 13:36 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: PREEMPT_RT related fixups. (rev7) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZmjOw7m1X0EvRDBu@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.