From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] vfio/pci: Allow MMIO regions to be exported through dma-buf
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 12:02:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZnlEGMLf6d2Nr2Hw@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240624065552.1572580-4-vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>
On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 11:53:11PM -0700, Vivek Kasireddy wrote:
> From Jason Gunthorpe:
> "dma-buf has become a way to safely acquire a handle to non-struct page
> memory that can still have lifetime controlled by the exporter. Notably
> RDMA can now import dma-buf FDs and build them into MRs which allows for
> PCI P2P operations. Extend this to allow vfio-pci to export MMIO memory
> from PCI device BARs.
>
> The patch design loosely follows the pattern in commit
> db1a8dd916aa ("habanalabs: add support for dma-buf exporter") except this
> does not support pinning.
>
> Instead, this implements what, in the past, we've called a revocable
> attachment using move. In normal situations the attachment is pinned, as a
> BAR does not change physical address. However when the VFIO device is
> closed, or a PCI reset is issued, access to the MMIO memory is revoked.
>
> Revoked means that move occurs, but an attempt to immediately re-map the
> memory will fail. In the reset case a future move will be triggered when
> MMIO access returns. As both close and reset are under userspace control
> it is expected that userspace will suspend use of the dma-buf before doing
> these operations, the revoke is purely for kernel self-defense against a
> hostile userspace."
>
> Following enhancements are made to the original patch:
> - Add support for creating dmabuf from multiple areas (or ranges)
> - Add a mmap handler to provide CPU access to the dmabuf
>
> Original-patch-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>
I think this makes sense for dma-buf, so has my Ack. Bunch of things I've
spotted below, but overall looks all fine conceptually. Also a suggestion
for a dma-buf doc patch, so that we can collect acks from at least all
current dynamic importers whether they're code will be fine with this new
dma-buf.
For the actual use-case and upstream merging I think that's up to vfio and
rdma maintainers, at least to me doesn't feel it's impacting the gpu side.
Well maybe long-term people will also use this for gpus, there's
difinitely interest in direct upload to vram, but that's maybe more a
use-case where the nvme side will import gpu buffers.
Cheers, Sima
> ---
> drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/vfio/pci/dma_buf.c | 438 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c | 22 +-
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c | 20 +-
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_priv.h | 23 ++
> include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 25 ++
> 7 files changed, 525 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/pci/dma_buf.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile b/drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile
> index cf00c0a7e55c..0cfdc9ede82f 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>
> vfio-pci-core-y := vfio_pci_core.o vfio_pci_intrs.o vfio_pci_rdwr.o vfio_pci_config.o
> vfio-pci-core-$(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_ZDEV_KVM) += vfio_pci_zdev.o
> +vfio-pci-core-$(CONFIG_DMA_SHARED_BUFFER) += dma_buf.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_CORE) += vfio-pci-core.o
>
> vfio-pci-y := vfio_pci.o
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/dma_buf.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/dma_buf.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..68760677c6a0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/dma_buf.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,438 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/* Copyright (c) 2024, NVIDIA CORPORATION & AFFILIATES.
> + */
> +#include <linux/dma-buf.h>
> +#include <linux/pci-p2pdma.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-resv.h>
> +
> +#include "vfio_pci_priv.h"
> +
> +MODULE_IMPORT_NS(DMA_BUF);
> +
> +struct vfio_pci_dma_buf {
> + struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
> + struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev;
> + struct list_head dmabufs_elm;
> + unsigned int nr_ranges;
> + struct vfio_region_dma_range *dma_ranges;
> + unsigned int orig_nents;
> + bool revoked;
> +};
> +
> +static vm_fault_t vfio_pci_dma_buf_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> +{
> + unsigned long addr = vmf->address - (vmf->pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT);
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
> + struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *priv = vma->vm_private_data;
> + struct vfio_region_dma_range *dma_ranges = priv->dma_ranges;
> + unsigned long pfn, i, j;
> + phys_addr_t phys;
> + size_t offset;
> +
> + if (priv->revoked)
> + return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
->revoked seems to be protected by dma_resv_lock, except not here.
> +
> + down_read(&priv->vdev->memory_lock);
> +
> + for (i = 0, j = 0; i < priv->nr_ranges && j < vma_pages(vma); i++) {
> + phys = pci_resource_start(priv->vdev->pdev,
> + dma_ranges[i].region_index);
> + phys += dma_ranges[i].offset;
> +
> + for (offset = 0; offset != dma_ranges[i].length;) {
> + pfn = (phys + offset) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> + if (vmf_insert_pfn(vma, addr, pfn) != VM_FAULT_NOPAGE) {
> + up_read(&priv->vdev->memory_lock);
> + return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
> + }
> +
> + addr += PAGE_SIZE;
> + offset += PAGE_SIZE;
> + if (++j == vma_pages(vma))
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + up_read(&priv->vdev->memory_lock);
> +
> + return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct vm_operations_struct vfio_pci_dma_buf_vmops = {
> + .fault = vfio_pci_dma_buf_fault,
> +};
> +
> +static int vfio_pci_dma_buf_mmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> + struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *priv = dmabuf->priv;
> + struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev = priv->vdev;
> + struct vfio_region_dma_range *dma_ranges = priv->dma_ranges;
> + int i;
> +
> + if ((vma->vm_flags & (VM_SHARED | VM_MAYSHARE)) == 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < priv->nr_ranges; i++)
> + if (!vdev->bar_mmap_supported[dma_ranges[i].region_index])
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_noncached(vma->vm_page_prot);
> + vma->vm_ops = &vfio_pci_dma_buf_vmops;
> + vma->vm_private_data = priv;
> + vm_flags_set(vma, VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED | VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP |
> + VM_DONTEXPAND | VM_DONTDUMP);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_pci_dma_buf_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> + struct dma_buf_attachment *attachment)
> +{
> + struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *priv = dmabuf->priv;
> + int rc;
> +
> + rc = pci_p2pdma_distance_many(priv->vdev->pdev, &attachment->dev, 1,
> + true);
> + if (rc < 0)
> + attachment->peer2peer = false;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_pci_dma_buf_unpin(struct dma_buf_attachment *attachment)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_pci_dma_buf_pin(struct dma_buf_attachment *attachment)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Uses the dynamic interface but must always allow for
> + * dma_buf_move_notify() to do revoke
> + */
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static int populate_sgt(struct dma_buf_attachment *attachment,
> + enum dma_data_direction dir,
> + struct sg_table *sgt, size_t sgl_size)
> +{
> + struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *priv = attachment->dmabuf->priv;
> + struct vfio_region_dma_range *dma_ranges = priv->dma_ranges;
> + size_t offset, chunk_size;
> + struct scatterlist *sgl;
> + dma_addr_t dma_addr;
> + phys_addr_t phys;
> + int i, j, ret;
> +
> + for_each_sgtable_sg(sgt, sgl, j)
> + sgl->length = 0;
> +
> + sgl = sgt->sgl;
> + for (i = 0; i < priv->nr_ranges; i++) {
> + phys = pci_resource_start(priv->vdev->pdev,
> + dma_ranges[i].region_index);
> + phys += dma_ranges[i].offset;
> +
> + /*
> + * Break the BAR's physical range up into max sized SGL's
> + * according to the device's requirement.
> + */
> + for (offset = 0; offset != dma_ranges[i].length;) {
> + chunk_size = min(dma_ranges[i].length - offset,
> + sgl_size);
> +
> + /*
> + * Since the memory being mapped is a device memory
> + * it could never be in CPU caches.
> + */
> + dma_addr = dma_map_resource(attachment->dev,
> + phys + offset,
> + chunk_size, dir,
> + DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
> + ret = dma_mapping_error(attachment->dev, dma_addr);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> +
> + sg_set_page(sgl, NULL, chunk_size, 0);
> + sg_dma_address(sgl) = dma_addr;
> + sg_dma_len(sgl) = chunk_size;
> + sgl = sg_next(sgl);
> + offset += chunk_size;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +err:
> + for_each_sgtable_sg(sgt, sgl, j) {
> + if (!sg_dma_len(sgl))
> + continue;
> +
> + dma_unmap_resource(attachment->dev, sg_dma_address(sgl),
> + sg_dma_len(sgl),
> + dir, DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static struct sg_table *
> +vfio_pci_dma_buf_map(struct dma_buf_attachment *attachment,
> + enum dma_data_direction dir)
> +{
> + size_t sgl_size = dma_get_max_seg_size(attachment->dev);
> + struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *priv = attachment->dmabuf->priv;
> + struct sg_table *sgt;
> + unsigned int nents;
> + int ret;
> +
> + dma_resv_assert_held(priv->dmabuf->resv);
> +
> + if (!attachment->peer2peer)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
> +
> + if (priv->revoked)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
I think a doc patch to dma_buf_ops.map_dma_buf that ENODEV signals
terminal revocation would be good. That patch would also be a really good
place to collected Acks from all the stakeholders that they're fine with
this change, since thus far map_dma_buf pretty much only failed when we've
run out of (device) memory.
> +
> + sgt = kzalloc(sizeof(*sgt), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!sgt)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + nents = DIV_ROUND_UP(priv->dmabuf->size, sgl_size);
> + ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, nents, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_kfree_sgt;
> +
> + ret = populate_sgt(attachment, dir, sgt, sgl_size);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_free_sgt;
> +
> + /*
> + * Because we are not going to include a CPU list we want to have some
> + * chance that other users will detect this by setting the orig_nents to
> + * 0 and using only nents (length of DMA list) when going over the sgl
> + */
> + priv->orig_nents = sgt->orig_nents;
> + sgt->orig_nents = 0;
> + return sgt;
> +
> +err_free_sgt:
> + sg_free_table(sgt);
> +err_kfree_sgt:
> + kfree(sgt);
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_pci_dma_buf_unmap(struct dma_buf_attachment *attachment,
> + struct sg_table *sgt,
> + enum dma_data_direction dir)
> +{
> + struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *priv = attachment->dmabuf->priv;
> + struct scatterlist *sgl;
> + int i;
> +
> + for_each_sgtable_dma_sg(sgt, sgl, i)
> + dma_unmap_resource(attachment->dev,
> + sg_dma_address(sgl),
> + sg_dma_len(sgl),
> + dir, DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
> +
> + sgt->orig_nents = priv->orig_nents;
> + sg_free_table(sgt);
> + kfree(sgt);
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_pci_dma_buf_release(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
> +{
> + struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *priv = dmabuf->priv;
> +
> + /*
> + * Either this or vfio_pci_dma_buf_cleanup() will remove from the list.
> + * The refcount prevents both.
> + */
> + if (priv->vdev) {
> + down_write(&priv->vdev->memory_lock);
> + list_del_init(&priv->dmabufs_elm);
> + up_write(&priv->vdev->memory_lock);
> + vfio_device_put_registration(&priv->vdev->vdev);
> + }
> + kfree(priv);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dma_buf_ops vfio_pci_dmabuf_ops = {
> + .attach = vfio_pci_dma_buf_attach,
> + .map_dma_buf = vfio_pci_dma_buf_map,
> + .pin = vfio_pci_dma_buf_pin,
> + .unpin = vfio_pci_dma_buf_unpin,
> + .release = vfio_pci_dma_buf_release,
> + .unmap_dma_buf = vfio_pci_dma_buf_unmap,
> + .mmap = vfio_pci_dma_buf_mmap,
> +};
> +
> +static int check_dma_ranges(struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *priv,
> + uint64_t *dmabuf_size)
> +{
> + struct vfio_region_dma_range *dma_ranges = priv->dma_ranges;
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = priv->vdev->pdev;
> + resource_size_t bar_size;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < priv->nr_ranges; i++) {
> + /*
> + * For PCI the region_index is the BAR number like
> + * everything else.
> + */
> + if (dma_ranges[i].region_index >= VFIO_PCI_ROM_REGION_INDEX)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(dma_ranges[i].offset, PAGE_SIZE) ||
> + !IS_ALIGNED(dma_ranges[i].length, PAGE_SIZE))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + bar_size = pci_resource_len(pdev, dma_ranges[i].region_index);
> + if (dma_ranges[i].offset > bar_size ||
> + dma_ranges[i].offset + dma_ranges[i].length > bar_size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + *dmabuf_size += dma_ranges[i].length;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int vfio_pci_core_feature_dma_buf(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, u32 flags,
> + struct vfio_device_feature_dma_buf __user *arg,
> + size_t argsz)
> +{
> + struct vfio_device_feature_dma_buf get_dma_buf;
> + struct vfio_region_dma_range *dma_ranges;
> + DEFINE_DMA_BUF_EXPORT_INFO(exp_info);
> + struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *priv;
> + uint64_t dmabuf_size = 0;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = vfio_check_feature(flags, argsz, VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_GET,
> + sizeof(get_dma_buf));
> + if (ret != 1)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(&get_dma_buf, arg, sizeof(get_dma_buf)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + dma_ranges = memdup_array_user(&arg->dma_ranges,
> + get_dma_buf.nr_ranges,
> + sizeof(*dma_ranges));
> + if (IS_ERR(dma_ranges))
> + return PTR_ERR(dma_ranges);
> +
> + priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!priv) {
> + kfree(dma_ranges);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + priv->vdev = vdev;
> + priv->nr_ranges = get_dma_buf.nr_ranges;
> + priv->dma_ranges = dma_ranges;
> +
> + ret = check_dma_ranges(priv, &dmabuf_size);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_free_priv;
> +
> + if (!vfio_device_try_get_registration(&vdev->vdev)) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_free_priv;
> + }
> +
> + exp_info.ops = &vfio_pci_dmabuf_ops;
> + exp_info.size = dmabuf_size;
> + exp_info.flags = get_dma_buf.open_flags;
> + exp_info.priv = priv;
> +
> + priv->dmabuf = dma_buf_export(&exp_info);
> + if (IS_ERR(priv->dmabuf)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->dmabuf);
> + goto err_dev_put;
> + }
> +
> + /* dma_buf_put() now frees priv */
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->dmabufs_elm);
> + down_write(&vdev->memory_lock);
> + dma_resv_lock(priv->dmabuf->resv, NULL);
> + priv->revoked = !__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev);
> + list_add_tail(&priv->dmabufs_elm, &vdev->dmabufs);
> + dma_resv_unlock(priv->dmabuf->resv);
> + up_write(&vdev->memory_lock);
> +
> + /*
> + * dma_buf_fd() consumes the reference, when the file closes the dmabuf
> + * will be released.
> + */
> + return dma_buf_fd(priv->dmabuf, get_dma_buf.open_flags);
> +
> +err_dev_put:
> + vfio_device_put_registration(&vdev->vdev);
> +err_free_priv:
> + kfree(dma_ranges);
> + kfree(priv);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void revoke_mmap_mappings(struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *priv)
> +{
> + struct inode *inode = file_inode(priv->dmabuf->file);
> +
> + unmap_mapping_range(inode->i_mapping, 0, priv->dmabuf->size, true);
I was freaking out for a moment until I remembered we've long ago switched
over to per-dma_buf inodes :-)
> +}
> +
> +void vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, bool revoked)
> +{
> + struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *priv;
> + struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *tmp;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held_write(&vdev->memory_lock);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(priv, tmp, &vdev->dmabufs, dmabufs_elm) {
> + /*
> + * Returns true if a reference was successfully obtained.
> + * The caller must interlock with the dmabuf's release
> + * function in some way, such as RCU, to ensure that this
s/some way/by holding vdev->memory_lock/ because as-is this sounds a bit
too much like yolo locking ...
> + * is not called on freed memory.
> + */
> + if (!get_file_rcu(&priv->dmabuf->file))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (priv->revoked != revoked) {
> + dma_resv_lock(priv->dmabuf->resv, NULL);
> + priv->revoked = revoked;
> + dma_buf_move_notify(priv->dmabuf);
> +
> + if (revoked)
> + revoke_mmap_mappings(priv);
> +
> + dma_resv_unlock(priv->dmabuf->resv);
> + }
> + dma_buf_put(priv->dmabuf);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void vfio_pci_dma_buf_cleanup(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
> +{
> + struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *priv;
> + struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *tmp;
> +
> + down_write(&vdev->memory_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(priv, tmp, &vdev->dmabufs, dmabufs_elm) {
> + if (!get_file_rcu(&priv->dmabuf->file))
> + continue;
> + dma_resv_lock(priv->dmabuf->resv, NULL);
> + list_del_init(&priv->dmabufs_elm);
> + priv->vdev = NULL;
> + priv->revoked = true;
> + dma_buf_move_notify(priv->dmabuf);
> + revoke_mmap_mappings(priv);
> + dma_resv_unlock(priv->dmabuf->resv);
> + vfio_device_put_registration(&vdev->vdev);
> + dma_buf_put(priv->dmabuf);
> + }
> + up_write(&vdev->memory_lock);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> index 97422aafaa7b..5cd7ec4b5e40 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> @@ -585,10 +585,12 @@ static int vfio_basic_config_write(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, int pos,
> virt_mem = !!(le16_to_cpu(*virt_cmd) & PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY);
> new_mem = !!(new_cmd & PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY);
>
> - if (!new_mem)
> + if (!new_mem) {
> vfio_pci_zap_and_down_write_memory_lock(vdev);
> - else
> + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, true);
> + } else {
> down_write(&vdev->memory_lock);
> + }
>
> /*
> * If the user is writing mem/io enable (new_mem/io) and we
> @@ -623,6 +625,8 @@ static int vfio_basic_config_write(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, int pos,
> *virt_cmd &= cpu_to_le16(~mask);
> *virt_cmd |= cpu_to_le16(new_cmd & mask);
>
> + if (__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev))
> + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, false);
> up_write(&vdev->memory_lock);
> }
>
> @@ -703,12 +707,16 @@ static int __init init_pci_cap_basic_perm(struct perm_bits *perm)
> static void vfio_lock_and_set_power_state(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> pci_power_t state)
> {
> - if (state >= PCI_D3hot)
> + if (state >= PCI_D3hot) {
> vfio_pci_zap_and_down_write_memory_lock(vdev);
> - else
> + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, true);
> + } else {
> down_write(&vdev->memory_lock);
> + }
>
> vfio_pci_set_power_state(vdev, state);
> + if (__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev))
> + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, false);
> up_write(&vdev->memory_lock);
> }
>
> @@ -896,7 +904,10 @@ static int vfio_exp_config_write(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, int pos,
>
> if (!ret && (cap & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_FLR)) {
> vfio_pci_zap_and_down_write_memory_lock(vdev);
> + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, true);
> pci_try_reset_function(vdev->pdev);
> + if (__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev))
> + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, true);
> up_write(&vdev->memory_lock);
> }
> }
> @@ -978,7 +989,10 @@ static int vfio_af_config_write(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, int pos,
>
> if (!ret && (cap & PCI_AF_CAP_FLR) && (cap & PCI_AF_CAP_TP)) {
> vfio_pci_zap_and_down_write_memory_lock(vdev);
> + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, true);
> pci_try_reset_function(vdev->pdev);
> + if (__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev))
> + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, true);
> up_write(&vdev->memory_lock);
> }
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> index 3282ef2dddea..154129133d5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> @@ -291,6 +291,8 @@ static int vfio_pci_runtime_pm_entry(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> * semaphore.
> */
> vfio_pci_zap_and_down_write_memory_lock(vdev);
> + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, true);
> +
> if (vdev->pm_runtime_engaged) {
> up_write(&vdev->memory_lock);
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -374,6 +376,8 @@ static void vfio_pci_runtime_pm_exit(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
> */
> down_write(&vdev->memory_lock);
> __vfio_pci_runtime_pm_exit(vdev);
> + if (__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev))
> + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, false);
> up_write(&vdev->memory_lock);
> }
>
> @@ -694,6 +698,8 @@ void vfio_pci_core_close_device(struct vfio_device *core_vdev)
> #endif
> vfio_pci_core_disable(vdev);
>
> + vfio_pci_dma_buf_cleanup(vdev);
> +
> mutex_lock(&vdev->igate);
> if (vdev->err_trigger) {
> eventfd_ctx_put(vdev->err_trigger);
> @@ -1238,7 +1244,10 @@ static int vfio_pci_ioctl_reset(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> */
> vfio_pci_set_power_state(vdev, PCI_D0);
>
> + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, true);
> ret = pci_try_reset_function(vdev->pdev);
> + if (__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev))
> + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, false);
> up_write(&vdev->memory_lock);
>
> return ret;
> @@ -1527,6 +1536,8 @@ int vfio_pci_core_ioctl_feature(struct vfio_device *device, u32 flags,
> return vfio_pci_core_pm_exit(vdev, flags, arg, argsz);
> case VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_PCI_VF_TOKEN:
> return vfio_pci_core_feature_token(vdev, flags, arg, argsz);
> + case VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_DMA_BUF:
> + return vfio_pci_core_feature_dma_buf(vdev, flags, arg, argsz);
> default:
> return -ENOTTY;
> }
> @@ -2077,6 +2088,7 @@ int vfio_pci_core_init_dev(struct vfio_device *core_vdev)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vdev->dummy_resources_list);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vdev->ioeventfds_list);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vdev->sriov_pfs_item);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vdev->dmabufs);
> init_rwsem(&vdev->memory_lock);
> xa_init(&vdev->ctx);
>
> @@ -2459,11 +2471,17 @@ static int vfio_pci_dev_set_hot_reset(struct vfio_device_set *dev_set,
> * cause the PCI config space reset without restoring the original
> * state (saved locally in 'vdev->pm_save').
> */
> - list_for_each_entry(vdev, &dev_set->device_list, vdev.dev_set_list)
> + list_for_each_entry(vdev, &dev_set->device_list, vdev.dev_set_list) {
> + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, true);
> vfio_pci_set_power_state(vdev, PCI_D0);
> + }
>
> ret = pci_reset_bus(pdev);
>
> + list_for_each_entry(vdev, &dev_set->device_list, vdev.dev_set_list)
> + if (__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev))
> + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, false);
> +
> vdev = list_last_entry(&dev_set->device_list,
> struct vfio_pci_core_device, vdev.dev_set_list);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_priv.h b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_priv.h
> index 5e4fa69aee16..09d3c300918c 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_priv.h
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_priv.h
> @@ -101,4 +101,27 @@ static inline bool vfio_pci_is_vga(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> return (pdev->class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_SHARED_BUFFER
> +int vfio_pci_core_feature_dma_buf(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, u32 flags,
> + struct vfio_device_feature_dma_buf __user *arg,
> + size_t argsz);
> +void vfio_pci_dma_buf_cleanup(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev);
> +void vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, bool revoked);
> +#else
> +static int
> +vfio_pci_core_feature_dma_buf(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, u32 flags,
> + struct vfio_device_feature_dma_buf __user *arg,
> + size_t argsz)
> +{
> + return -ENOTTY;
> +}
> +static inline void vfio_pci_dma_buf_cleanup(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
> +{
> +}
> +static inline void vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> + bool revoked)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> #endif
> diff --git a/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h b/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h
> index f87067438ed4..3756e0904de2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h
> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ struct vfio_pci_core_device {
> struct vfio_pci_core_device *sriov_pf_core_dev;
> struct notifier_block nb;
> struct rw_semaphore memory_lock;
> + struct list_head dmabufs;
> };
>
> /* Will be exported for vfio pci drivers usage */
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> index 2b68e6cdf190..6f283dadacb7 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -1458,6 +1458,31 @@ struct vfio_device_feature_bus_master {
> };
> #define VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_BUS_MASTER 10
>
> +/**
> + * Upon VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_GET create a dma_buf fd for the
> + * regions selected.
> + *
> + * open_flags are the typical flags passed to open(2), eg O_RDWR, O_CLOEXEC,
> + * etc. offset/length specify a slice of the region to create the dmabuf from.
> + * nr_ranges is the total number of (P2P DMA) ranges that comprise the dmabuf.
> + *
> + * Return: The fd number on success, -1 and errno is set on failure.
> + */
> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_DMA_BUF 11
> +
> +struct vfio_region_dma_range {
> + __u32 region_index;
> + __u32 __pad;
> + __u64 offset;
> + __u64 length;
> +};
> +
> +struct vfio_device_feature_dma_buf {
> + __u32 open_flags;
> + __u32 nr_ranges;
> + struct vfio_region_dma_range dma_ranges[];
> +};
> +
> /* -------- API for Type1 VFIO IOMMU -------- */
>
> /**
> --
> 2.45.1
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-24 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-24 6:53 [PATCH v2 0/3] vfio/pci: Allow MMIO regions to be exported through dma-buf Vivek Kasireddy
2024-06-24 6:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] vfio: Export vfio device get and put registration helpers Vivek Kasireddy
2024-06-24 6:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] vfio/pci: Share the core device pointer while invoking feature functions Vivek Kasireddy
2024-06-24 6:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] vfio/pci: Allow MMIO regions to be exported through dma-buf Vivek Kasireddy
2024-06-24 10:02 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2024-06-24 14:11 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-01 4:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] " Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZnlEGMLf6d2Nr2Hw@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.