From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@wdc.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ata,scsi: libata-core: Do not leak memory for ata_port struct members
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 22:28:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZoG_5Jvo8_fEt_8I@ryzen.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18252752-d3ed-4924-ae5c-4d3e0120d973@oracle.com>
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 10:42:45AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 29/06/2024 13:42, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > libsas is currently not freeing all the struct ata_port struct members,
> > e.g. ncq_sense_buf for a driver supporting Command Duration Limits (CDL).
> >
> > Add a function, ata_port_free(), that is used to free a ata_port,
> > including its struct members. It makes sense to keep the code related to
> > freeing a ata_port in its own function, which will also free all the
> > struct members of struct ata_port.
> >
> > Fixes: 18bd7718b5c4 ("scsi: ata: libata: Handle completion of CDL commands using policy 0xD")
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
>
> Apart from a couple of nitpicks:
>
> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
> > drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c | 2 +-
> > include/linux/libata.h | 1 +
> > 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> > index f47838da75d7..481baa55ebfc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> > @@ -5490,6 +5490,18 @@ struct ata_port *ata_port_alloc(struct ata_host *host)
> > return ap;
> > }
> > +void ata_port_free(struct ata_port *ap)
> > +{
> > + if (!ap)
> > + return;
>
> nit: personally I'd have the caller check this. The main reason for that is
> that often it seems an unnecessary check.
People are used to free() family of functions handling NULL,
so I think it is wise to keep it as is.
>
> > +
> > + kfree(ap->pmp_link);
> > + kfree(ap->slave_link);
> > + kfree(ap->ncq_sense_buf);
> > + kfree(ap);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_port_free);
> > +
> > static void ata_devres_release(struct device *gendev, void *res)
> > {
> > struct ata_host *host = dev_get_drvdata(gendev);
> > @@ -5516,15 +5528,7 @@ static void ata_host_release(struct kref *kref)
> > int i;
> > for (i = 0; i < host->n_ports; i++) {
> > - struct ata_port *ap = host->ports[i];
> > -
> > - if (!ap)
> > - continue;
> > -
> > - kfree(ap->pmp_link);
> > - kfree(ap->slave_link);
> > - kfree(ap->ncq_sense_buf);
> > - kfree(ap);
> > + ata_port_free(host->ports[i]);
> > host->ports[i] = NULL;
> > }
> > kfree(host);
> > @@ -5907,7 +5911,7 @@ int ata_host_register(struct ata_host *host, const struct scsi_host_template *sh
> > * allocation time.
> > */
> > for (i = host->n_ports; host->ports[i]; i++)
> > - kfree(host->ports[i]);
> > + ata_port_free(host->ports[i]);
> > /* give ports names and add SCSI hosts */
> > for (i = 0; i < host->n_ports; i++) {
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
> > index 4c69fc63c119..1f247a8cd185 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
> > @@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ int sas_ata_init(struct domain_device *found_dev)
> > return 0;
> > destroy_port:
> > - kfree(ap);
> > + ata_port_free(ap);
>
> nit: If not a nuisance, could we change the label name to free_port, like
> free_host, below. No big deal.
Sure, will fixup when applying.
>
> > free_host:
> > ata_host_put(ata_host);
> > return rc;
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
> > index 8fb7c41c0962..48d975c6dbf2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
> > @@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ void sas_free_device(struct kref *kref)
> > if (dev_is_sata(dev) && dev->sata_dev.ap) {
> > ata_sas_tport_delete(dev->sata_dev.ap);
> > - kfree(dev->sata_dev.ap);
> > + ata_port_free(dev->sata_dev.ap);
> > ata_host_put(dev->sata_dev.ata_host);
> > dev->sata_dev.ata_host = NULL;
> > dev->sata_dev.ap = NULL;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h
> > index 13fb41d25da6..7d3bd7c9664a 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/libata.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/libata.h
> > @@ -1249,6 +1249,7 @@ extern int ata_slave_link_init(struct ata_port *ap);
> > extern struct ata_port *ata_sas_port_alloc(struct ata_host *,
> > struct ata_port_info *, struct Scsi_Host *);
> > extern void ata_port_probe(struct ata_port *ap);
> > +extern void ata_port_free(struct ata_port *ap);
> > extern int ata_sas_tport_add(struct device *parent, struct ata_port *ap);
> > extern void ata_sas_tport_delete(struct ata_port *ap);
> > int ata_sas_device_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct queue_limits *lim,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-30 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-29 12:42 [PATCH 0/4] libata/libsas cleanup fixes Niklas Cassel
2024-06-29 12:42 ` [PATCH 1/4] ata: libata-core: Fix null pointer dereference on error Niklas Cassel
2024-06-30 9:36 ` John Garry
2024-06-29 12:42 ` [PATCH 2/4] ata,scsi: libata-core: Do not leak memory for ata_port struct members Niklas Cassel
2024-06-30 9:42 ` John Garry
2024-06-30 20:28 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2024-07-01 6:21 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-06-29 12:42 ` [PATCH 3/4] ata: libata-core: Fix double free on error Niklas Cassel
2024-06-29 12:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] ata: ahci: Clean up sysfs file " Niklas Cassel
2024-06-30 21:02 ` [PATCH 0/4] libata/libsas cleanup fixes Niklas Cassel
2024-07-03 2:37 ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-06-30 21:05 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZoG_5Jvo8_fEt_8I@ryzen.lan \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=niklas.cassel@wdc.com \
--cc=yanaijie@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.