From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: lufei <lufei@uniontech.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] acct01: add EFAULT errno check
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 15:29:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zoajv8Y1HEbjvhmh@yuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240606065506.1686-1-lufei@uniontech.com>
Hi!
> 1. add EFAULT errno check.
> 2. fix make check errors and warnings.
Can you please split the functional changes and make chek fixes into
separate tests?
Ideally each type of change should be put into a separate patch.
> Signed-off-by: lufei <lufei@uniontech.com>
> ---
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct01.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct01.c
> index a05ed2ea9..ed1817bc5 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct01.c
> @@ -25,8 +25,7 @@
>
> #include "tst_test.h"
>
> -#define DIR_MODE (S_IRUSR|S_IWUSR|S_IXUSR|S_IRGRP| \
> - S_IXGRP|S_IROTH|S_IXOTH)
> +#define DIR_MODE 0755
> #define FILE_EISDIR "."
> #define FILE_EACCESS "/dev/null"
> #define FILE_ENOENT "/tmp/does/not/exist"
> @@ -34,6 +33,7 @@
> #define FILE_TMPFILE "./tmpfile"
> #define FILE_ELOOP "test_file_eloop1"
> #define FILE_EROFS "ro_mntpoint/file"
> +#define FILE_EFAULT "/tmp/invalid/file/name"
>
> static struct passwd *ltpuser;
>
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ static char *file_eloop;
> static char *file_enametoolong;
> static char *file_erofs;
> static char *file_null;
> +static char *file_efault;
>
> static void setup_euid(void)
> {
> @@ -57,12 +58,22 @@ static void cleanup_euid(void)
> SAFE_SETEUID(0);
> }
>
> +static void setup_emem(void)
> +{
> + file_efault = SAFE_MMAP(NULL, 1, PROT_NONE,
> + MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, 0, 0);
> +}
> +static void cleanup_emem(void)
> +{
> + SAFE_MUNMAP(file_efault, 1);
> +}
> +
> static struct test_case {
> char **filename;
> char *desc;
> int exp_errno;
> - void (*setupfunc) ();
> - void (*cleanfunc) ();
> + void (*setupfunc)();
> + void (*cleanfunc)();
> } tcases[] = {
> {&file_eisdir, FILE_EISDIR, EISDIR, NULL, NULL},
> {&file_eaccess, FILE_EACCESS, EACCES, NULL, NULL},
> @@ -73,16 +84,13 @@ static struct test_case {
> {&file_eloop, FILE_ELOOP, ELOOP, NULL, NULL},
> {&file_enametoolong, "aaaa...", ENAMETOOLONG, NULL, NULL},
> {&file_erofs, FILE_EROFS, EROFS, NULL, NULL},
> + {&file_efault, FILE_EFAULT, EFAULT, setup_emem, cleanup_emem},
^
This should actually describe the testcase so
it should be something as "Invalid address"
> };
>
> static void setup(void)
> {
> int fd;
>
> - TEST(acct(NULL));
> - if (TST_RET == -1 && TST_ERR == ENOSYS)
> - tst_brk(TCONF, "acct() system call isn't configured in kernel");
> -
> ltpuser = SAFE_GETPWNAM("nobody");
>
> fd = SAFE_CREAT(FILE_TMPFILE, 0777);
> @@ -113,7 +121,7 @@ static void verify_acct(unsigned int nr)
> tcase->setupfunc();
>
> TST_EXP_FAIL(acct(*tcase->filename), tcase->exp_errno,
> - "acct(%s)", tcase->desc);
> + "acct(%s)", tcase->desc);
>
> if (tcase->cleanfunc)
> tcase->cleanfunc();
> @@ -136,5 +144,8 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
> {&file_enametoolong, .size = PATH_MAX+2},
> {&file_erofs, .str = FILE_EROFS},
> {}
> - }
> + },
> + .needs_kconfigs = (const char *[]) {
> + "CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT=y",
> + },
> };
And this is a different change that is not described in the patch
description. So this patch should be actually split into three patches,
one that adds errno check, one that adds needs_kconfigs and one that
fixes make check errors.
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
> index d3f3d9d04..74019f430 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static void run(void)
>
> if (read_bytes != acct_size) {
> tst_res(TFAIL, "incomplete read %i bytes, expected %i",
> - read_bytes, acct_size);
> + read_bytes, acct_size);
> goto exit;
> }
>
> --
> 2.39.3
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-04 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-06 6:55 [LTP] [PATCH] acct01: add EFAULT errno check lufei
2024-06-21 12:00 ` Petr Vorel
[not found] ` <20240624015245.54968-1-lufei@uniontech.com>
2024-06-24 1:52 ` lufei
2024-07-08 4:23 ` Petr Vorel
2024-07-08 5:31 ` 路斐
2024-07-08 8:54 ` Petr Vorel
2024-07-29 22:44 ` Petr Vorel
2024-06-24 1:54 ` [LTP] [PATCH] acct: fix make check errors: using .needs_kconfigs lufei
2024-07-04 13:29 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2024-07-05 2:02 ` [LTP] [PATCH] acct01: add EFAULT errno check 路斐
2024-07-08 8:56 ` Cyril Hrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zoajv8Y1HEbjvhmh@yuki \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=lufei@uniontech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.