All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Juan José Arboleda" <soyjuanarbol@gmail.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: pure.logic@nexus-software.ie, johan@kernel.org,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, trivial@kernel.org,
	greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: Enclose multi-statement macro in do-while loop
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 03:28:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZpeAsakTE0ZL90kt@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2024071739-mollusk-uneaten-8dec@gregkh>

On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 09:50:52AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 01:58:34AM -0500, Juan José Arboleda wrote:
> > The macro `gb_loopback_stats_attrs` in the Greybus loopback driver
> > contains multiple statements, which should be enclosed in a do-while
> > loop to ensure proper execution and adhere to coding standards.
> > 
> > This patch modifies the `gb_loopback_stats_attrs` macro to enclose
> > its statements in a do-while loop, addressing the style error flagged
> > by checkpatch.pl.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Juan José Arboleda <soyjuanarbol@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c | 8 +++++---
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c
> > index 4313d3bbc23a..a97de86c67a5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c
> > @@ -163,9 +163,11 @@ static ssize_t name##_avg_show(struct device *dev,		\
> >  static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(name##_avg)
> >  
> >  #define gb_loopback_stats_attrs(field)				\
> > -	gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, min, u);		\
> > -	gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, max, u);		\
> > -	gb_loopback_ro_avg_attr(field)
> > +	do {							\
> > +		gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, min, u);	\
> > +		gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, max, u);	\
> > +		gb_loopback_ro_avg_attr(field);			\
> > +	} while (0)
> >  
> >  #define gb_loopback_attr(field, type)					\
> >  static ssize_t field##_show(struct device *dev,				\
> 
> Are you sure you test-built this change?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Yes! I build and clean and build and clean and build again, everything seems
fine from the compiler side and posttest task as well. Everything seems ok.

Thanks,
- Juan José


  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-17  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-17  6:58 [PATCH] staging: greybus: Enclose multi-statement macro in do-while loop Juan José Arboleda
2024-07-17  7:50 ` Greg KH
2024-07-17  8:28   ` Juan José Arboleda [this message]
2024-07-17  8:45     ` Greg KH
2024-07-18  3:32       ` [PATCH v2] staging: greybus: break multi statement macro into multiple lines Juan José Arboleda
2024-07-18  4:35         ` Greg KH
2024-07-18  4:47         ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZpeAsakTE0ZL90kt@fedora \
    --to=soyjuanarbol@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pure.logic@nexus-software.ie \
    --cc=trivial@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.