All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
	muchun.song@linux.dev, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] memcontrol: define root_mem_cgroup for CONFIG_MEMCG=n cases
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 13:13:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZppKZJKMcPF4OGVc@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2050f8a1bc181a9aaf01e0866e230e23216000f4.1721384771.git.wqu@suse.com>

On Fri 19-07-24 19:58:39, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> There is an incoming btrfs patchset, which will use @root_mem_cgroup as
> the active cgroup to attach metadata folios to its internal btree
> inode, so that btrfs can skip the possibly costly charge for the
> internal inode which is only accessible by btrfs itself.
> 
> However @root_mem_cgroup is not always defined (not defined for
> CONFIG_MEMCG=n case), thus all such callers need to do the extra
> handling for different CONFIG_MEMCG settings.
> 
> So here we add a special macro definition of root_mem_cgroup, making it
> to always be NULL.

Isn't just a declaration sufficient? Nothing should really dereference
the pointer anyway.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-19 11:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-19 10:28 [PATCH v7 0/3] btrfs: try to allocate larger folios for metadata Qu Wenruo
2024-07-19 10:28 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] memcontrol: define root_mem_cgroup for CONFIG_MEMCG=n cases Qu Wenruo
2024-07-19 11:13   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2024-07-19 21:58     ` Qu Wenruo
2024-07-22  7:32       ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-19 10:28 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] btrfs: always uses root memcgroup for filemap_add_folio() Qu Wenruo
2024-07-19 17:02   ` Johannes Weiner
2024-07-19 17:25     ` Roman Gushchin
2024-07-19 18:13     ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-19 22:11       ` Qu Wenruo
2024-07-22  7:34         ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-22  8:08           ` Qu Wenruo
2024-07-24  3:46       ` Qu Wenruo
2024-07-19 10:28 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] btrfs: prefer to allocate larger folio for metadata Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZppKZJKMcPF4OGVc@tiehlicka \
    --to=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.