From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E87DC3DA63 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 12:48:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sWbPA-0000l1-Sg; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 08:47:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sWbP8-0000jO-Vo for qemu-riscv@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 08:47:39 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sWbP7-0008FC-13 for qemu-riscv@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 08:47:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1721825255; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=mK4f87H4NY9/71BRSRerJJDAo9/63WdDPrXjfZ2Qy1M=; b=b+HzGWOO0hyypM4RiwFWrPXfkDtcySkaW2erJhqmGKfpIfyox4Ahh+xUkhEmYNn0lcm1FN Wqua5KdlRd9ixSrbtsGrIovKFdxdfmv85bKfLzPnKhadjhykTWUbE3YckLVpzC1p9VlHcn mRz+Dy6dAMXNGRUVQZqoE/zGrft1Sso= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-382-tIJwzxVHPJu-ibIE437_Ow-1; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 08:47:32 -0400 X-MC-Unique: tIJwzxVHPJu-ibIE437_Ow-1 Received: from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A70071955F06; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 12:47:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.42.28.141]) by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1737019560AE; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 12:47:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:47:16 +0100 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Markus Armbruster Cc: Zhao Liu , Eduardo Habkost , Marcel Apfelbaum , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Yanan Wang , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson , Eric Blake , Marcelo Tosatti , Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= , Peter Maydell , Jonathan Cameron , Sia Jee Heng , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Zhenyu Wang , Dapeng Mi , Yongwei Ma Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] qapi/qom: Introduce smp-cache object Message-ID: References: <20240704031603.1744546-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com> <20240704031603.1744546-3-zhao1.liu@intel.com> <87wmld361y.fsf@pond.sub.org> <87h6cfowei.fsf@pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h6cfowei.fsf@pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.12 (2023-09-09) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -21 X-Spam_score: -2.2 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.136, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-riscv@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Errors-To: qemu-riscv-bounces+qemu-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-riscv-bounces+qemu-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 01:35:17PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Zhao Liu writes: > > > Hi Markus, > >> SmpCachesProperties and SmpCacheProperties would put the singular > >> vs. plural where it belongs. Sounds a bit awkward to me, though. > >> Naming is hard. > > > > For SmpCachesProperties, it's easy to overlook the first "s". > > > >> Other ideas, anybody? > > > > Maybe SmpCacheOptions or SmpCachesPropertyWrapper? > > I wonder why we have a single QOM object to configure all caches, and > not one QOM object per cache. Previous versions of this series were augmenting the existing -smp command line. Now the design has switched to use -object, I agree that it'd be simplest to just have one -object flag added per cache level we want to defnie. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|