From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>, Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/11] KVM: x86: Relax locking for kvm_test_age_gfn and kvm_age_gfn
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 11:07:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZqKUefN3HgBQQkuA@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240724011037.3671523-3-jthoughton@google.com>
On 2024-07-24 01:10 AM, James Houghton wrote:
> Walk the TDP MMU in an RCU read-side critical section. This requires a
> way to do RCU-safe walking of the tdp_mmu_roots; do this with a new
> macro. The PTE modifications are now done atomically, and
> kvm_tdp_mmu_spte_need_atomic_write() has been updated to account for the
> fact that kvm_age_gfn can now lockless update the accessed bit and the
> R/X bits).
>
> If the cmpxchg for marking the spte for access tracking fails, we simply
> retry if the spte is still a leaf PTE. If it isn't, we return false
> to continue the walk.
>
> Harvesting age information from the shadow MMU is still done while
> holding the MMU write lock.
>
> Suggested-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Aside from the comment fixes below,
Reviewed-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 10 ++++-
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h | 27 +++++++------
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 5 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,13 @@ static inline u64 kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte_atomic(tdp_ptep_t sptep, u64 new_spte)
> return xchg(rcu_dereference(sptep), new_spte);
> }
>
> +static inline u64 tdp_mmu_clear_spte_bits_atomic(tdp_ptep_t sptep, u64 mask)
> +{
> + atomic64_t *sptep_atomic = (atomic64_t *)rcu_dereference(sptep);
> +
> + return (u64)atomic64_fetch_and(~mask, sptep_atomic);
> +}
> +
> static inline void __kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(tdp_ptep_t sptep, u64 new_spte)
> {
> KVM_MMU_WARN_ON(is_ept_ve_possible(new_spte));
> @@ -32,10 +39,11 @@ static inline void __kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(tdp_ptep_t sptep, u64 new_spte)
> }
>
> /*
> - * SPTEs must be modified atomically if they are shadow-present, leaf
> - * SPTEs, and have volatile bits, i.e. has bits that can be set outside
> - * of mmu_lock. The Writable bit can be set by KVM's fast page fault
> - * handler, and Accessed and Dirty bits can be set by the CPU.
> + * SPTEs must be modified atomically if they have bits that can be set outside
> + * of the mmu_lock. This can happen for any shadow-present leaf SPTEs, as the
> + * Writable bit can be set by KVM's fast page fault handler, the Accessed and
> + * Dirty bits can be set by the CPU, and the Accessed and R/X bits can be
"R/X bits" should be "W/R/X bits".
> + * cleared by age_gfn_range.
nit: "age_gfn_range()"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-25 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-24 1:10 [PATCH v6 00/11] mm: multi-gen LRU: Walk secondary MMU page tables while aging James Houghton
2024-07-24 1:10 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] KVM: Add lockless memslot walk to KVM James Houghton
2024-07-25 16:39 ` David Matlack
2024-07-26 0:28 ` James Houghton
2024-07-24 1:10 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] KVM: x86: Relax locking for kvm_test_age_gfn and kvm_age_gfn James Houghton
2024-07-25 18:07 ` David Matlack [this message]
2024-07-26 0:34 ` James Houghton
2024-08-17 1:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-30 0:35 ` James Houghton
2024-08-30 3:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-30 12:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-30 17:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-30 20:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-07-24 1:10 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] KVM: arm64: " James Houghton
2024-07-25 21:55 ` James Houghton
2024-08-17 0:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-17 1:03 ` Yu Zhao
2024-08-19 20:41 ` Oliver Upton
2024-08-19 22:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-30 0:33 ` James Houghton
2024-08-30 0:48 ` Oliver Upton
2024-08-30 15:33 ` David Matlack
2024-08-30 17:38 ` Oliver Upton
2024-07-24 1:10 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] mm: Add missing mmu_notifier_clear_young for !MMU_NOTIFIER James Houghton
2024-08-01 9:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-06 17:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-07-24 1:10 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] mm: Add fast_only bool to test_young and clear_young MMU notifiers James Houghton
2024-08-01 9:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-01 23:13 ` James Houghton
2024-08-02 15:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-05 16:54 ` James Houghton
2024-08-06 17:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-07 15:02 ` James Houghton
2024-08-07 18:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-07-24 1:10 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] mm: Add has_fast_aging to struct mmu_notifier James Houghton
2024-07-24 1:10 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] KVM: Pass fast_only to kvm_{test_,}age_gfn James Houghton
2024-07-24 1:10 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] KVM: x86: Optimize kvm_{test_,}age_gfn a little bit James Houghton
2024-07-25 18:17 ` David Matlack
2024-08-17 1:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-30 0:34 ` James Houghton
2024-07-24 1:10 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] KVM: x86: Implement fast_only versions of kvm_{test_,}age_gfn James Houghton
2024-07-25 18:24 ` David Matlack
2024-07-24 1:10 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] mm: multi-gen LRU: Have secondary MMUs participate in aging James Houghton
2024-07-24 1:10 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] KVM: selftests: Add multi-gen LRU aging to access_tracking_perf_test James Houghton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZqKUefN3HgBQQkuA@google.com \
--to=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.