Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/3] introduce new VFS based BPF kfuncs

[Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@google.com>]

On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 03:22:09PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 08:56:01AM GMT, Matt Bobrowski wrote:
> > G'day!
> > 
> > The original cover letter providing background context and motivating
> > factors around the needs for these new VFS related BPF kfuncs
> > introduced within this patch series can be found here [0]. Please do
> > reference that if needed.
> > 
> > The changes contained within this version of the patch series mainly
> > came at the back of discussions held with Christian at LSFMMBPF
> > recently. In summary, the primary difference within this patch series
> > when compared to the last [1] is that I've reduced the number of VFS
> > related BPF kfuncs being introduced, housed them under fs/, and added
> > more selftests.
> 
> I have no complaints about this now that it's been boiled down.
> So as far as I'm concerned I'm happy to pick this up. (I also wouldn't
> mind follow-up patches that move the xattr bpf kfuncs under fs/ as
> well.)

Wonderful, thank you Christian!

I agree, those should also reside in alongside these newly added BPF
kfuncs. I'll send through a patch addressing this
separately. Generally, I think the same applies for any other VFS
related BPF kfuncs that end up getting introduced moving forward.

/M