From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
leit@meta.com, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/apic: Add retry mechanism to add_pin_to_irq_node()
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 03:28:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZqjAVDBBdYSxbdPO@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871q3c855i.ffs@tglx>
Hello Thomas,
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 07:44:09PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> I'm absolutely not convinced by this loop heuristic. That's just a bad
> >> hack.
> >
> > I will not disagree with you here, but I need to use this patch in order
> > to be able t keep the system not panicking and stable while fault
> > injecting slab errors and trying to reproduce a real bug in the network
> > stack.
>
> Something like the untested below should just work.
Thanks. I've tested in a Skylake machine and I haven't see the crash
running the same test for more than 2 hours.
Feel free to add the following, in case you submit it:
Tested-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
This is the machine details, if it is useful.
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) D-2191A CPU @ 1.60GHz
PIC: Intel Corporation Sky Lake-E IOAPIC
> Thanks,
Thank you!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-30 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-29 14:06 [PATCH] x86/apic: Add retry mechanism to add_pin_to_irq_node() Breno Leitao
2024-07-29 16:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-07-29 16:55 ` Breno Leitao
2024-07-29 17:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-07-30 10:28 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2024-08-07 16:25 ` [tip: x86/apic] x86/ioapic: Handle allocation failures gracefully tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZqjAVDBBdYSxbdPO@gmail.com \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=ahuang12@lenovo.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=leit@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.