From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>,
Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@nxp.com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>,
"linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
"imx@lists.linux.dev" <imx@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] remoteproc: imx_rproc: handle system off for i.MX7ULP
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 07:17:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZquK5CNtRJTTtlkD@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB9PR04MB84615384294C38EEA5B95F0088B02@DB9PR04MB8461.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 08:06:22AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] remoteproc: imx_rproc: handle system off
> > for i.MX7ULP
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 04:49:04PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > >
> > > The i.MX7ULP Cortex-A7 is under control of Cortex-M4. The
> > i.MX7ULP
> > > Linux poweroff and restart rely on rpmsg driver to send a message to
> > > Cortex-M4 firmware. Then Cortex-A7 could poweroff or restart by
> > > Cortex-M4 to configure the i.MX7ULP power controller properly.
> > >
> > > However the reboot and restart kernel common code use atomic
> > notifier,
> > > so with blocking tx mailbox will trigger kernel dump, because of
> > > blocking mailbox will use wait_for_completion_timeout. In such case,
> > > linux no need to wait for completion.
> > >
> > > Current patch is to use non-blocking tx mailbox channel when system
> > is
> > > going to poweroff or restart.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 36
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c index
> > 01cf1dfb2e87..e1abf110abc9
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> > > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
> > > +#include <linux/reboot.h>
> > > #include <linux/regmap.h>
> > > #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> > > #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > > @@ -114,6 +115,7 @@ struct imx_rproc {
> > > u32 entry; /* cpu start
> > address */
> > > u32 core_index;
> > > struct dev_pm_domain_list *pd_list;
> > > + struct sys_off_data data;
> >
> > What is this for? I don't see it used in this patch.
>
> Oh, it was added when I was developing this feature, but in the end
> this seems not needed.
>
> >
> > > };
> > >
> > > static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx93[] = { @@
> > > -1050,6 +1052,22 @@ static int imx_rproc_clk_enable(struct
> > imx_rproc *priv)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int imx_rproc_sys_off_handler(struct sys_off_data *data) {
> > > + struct rproc *rproc = data->cb_data;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
> > > +
> > > + ret = imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(rproc, false);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Failed to request non-blocking
> > mbox\n");
> > > + return NOTIFY_BAD;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> > > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > @@ -1104,6 +1122,24 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > > if (rproc->state != RPROC_DETACHED)
> > > rproc->auto_boot = of_property_read_bool(np,
> > "fsl,auto-boot");
> > >
> > > + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "fsl,imx7ulp-cm4"))
> > {
> > > + ret = devm_register_sys_off_handler(dev,
> > SYS_OFF_MODE_POWER_OFF_PREPARE,
> > > +
> > SYS_OFF_PRIO_DEFAULT,
> > > +
> > imx_rproc_sys_off_handler, rproc);
> >
> > Why does the mailbox needs to be set up again when the system is
> > going down...
>
> As wrote in commit message:
> "i.MX7ULP Linux poweroff and restart rely on rpmsg driver to send a
> message," so need to set up mailbox in non-blocking way to send
> a message to M4 side.
>
> >
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "register power off handler
> > failure\n");
> > > + goto err_put_clk;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + ret = devm_register_sys_off_handler(dev,
> > SYS_OFF_MODE_RESTART_PREPARE,
> > > +
> > SYS_OFF_PRIO_DEFAULT,
> > > +
> > imx_rproc_sys_off_handler, rproc);
> >
> > ... and why does it need to be free'd when the system is going up?
>
>
> Sorry, I not get your point. The free is in imx_rproc_sys_off_handler.
> During system booting, the mailbox is not freed.
Why is the same operation done at both startup and shutdown - that is not clear.
I am currently away from the office, returning on August 12th. As such I will
not be following up on this thread until then.
>
> Thanks,
> Peng.
>
> >
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "register restart handler
> > failure\n");
> > > + goto err_put_clk;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > ret = rproc_add(rproc);
> > > if (ret) {
> > > dev_err(dev, "rproc_add failed\n");
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.37.1
> > >
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-01 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-19 8:49 [PATCH v2 0/2] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support non-blocking tx for i.MX7ULP Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-07-19 8:48 ` Daniel Baluta
2024-07-19 8:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] remoteproc: imx_rproc: allow tx_block to be set Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-07-19 8:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] remoteproc: imx_rproc: handle system off for i.MX7ULP Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-07-29 15:35 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-07-30 8:06 ` Peng Fan
2024-08-01 13:17 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2024-08-02 4:59 ` Peng Fan
2024-08-14 15:00 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-08-15 3:32 ` Peng Fan
2024-08-21 8:33 ` Daniel Baluta
2024-08-21 16:58 ` Mathieu Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZquK5CNtRJTTtlkD@p14s \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.baluta@nxp.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=iuliana.prodan@nxp.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.