From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf annotate-data: Set bitfield member offset and size properly
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 17:42:28 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZsT_tHyuwb8L3KVB@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240815223823.2402285-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 03:38:23PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> The bitfield members might not have DW_AT_data_member_location. Let's
> use DW_AT_data_bit_offset to set the member offset correct. Also use
> DW_AT_bit_size for the name like in a C program.
Thanks, applied and added the series of steps to reproduce your results:
Commiter notes:
Collect some data:
root@number:~# perf mem record -a --ldlat 5 -- ping -s 8193 -f 192.168.86.1
Memory events are enabled on a subset of CPUs: 16-27
PING 192.168.86.1 (192.168.86.1) 8193(8221) bytes of data.
.^C
--- 192.168.86.1 ping statistics ---
13881 packets transmitted, 13880 received, 0.00720409% packet loss, time 8664ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.510/0.599/7.768/0.115 ms, ipg/ewma 0.624/0.593 ms
[ perf record: Woken up 8 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 14.877 MB perf.data (46785 samples) ]
root@number:~#
root@number:~# perf evlist
cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=5/P
cpu_atom/mem-stores/P
dummy:u
root@number:~# perf evlist -v
cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=5/P: type: 10 (cpu_atom), size: 136, config: 0x5d0 (mem-loads), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, disabled: 1, inherit: 1, freq: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1, { bp_addr, config1 }: 0x7
cpu_atom/mem-stores/P: type: 10 (cpu_atom), size: 136, config: 0x6d0 (mem-stores), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, disabled: 1, inherit: 1, freq: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1
dummy:u: type: 1 (software), size: 136, config: 0x9 (PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 1, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, inherit: 1, exclude_kernel: 1, exclude_hv: 1, mmap: 1, comm: 1, task: 1, mmap_data: 1, sample_id_all: 1, exclude_guest: 1, mmap2: 1, comm_exec: 1, ksymbol: 1, bpf_event: 1
root@number:~#
Ok, now lets see what changes from before this patch to after it:
root@number:~# perf annotate --data-type > /tmp/before
Apply the patch, build:
root@number:~# perf annotate --data-type > /tmp/after
The first hunk of the diff, for a glib data structure, in userspace,
look at those bitfields:
root@number:~# diff -u10 /tmp/before /tmp/after | head -20
--- /tmp/before 2024-08-20 17:29:58.306765780 -0300
+++ /tmp/after 2024-08-20 17:33:13.210582596 -0300
@@ -163,22 +163,22 @@
Annotate type: 'GHashTable' in /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0.8000.3 (1 samples):
============================================================================
Percent offset size field
100.00 0 96 GHashTable {
0.00 0 8 gsize size;
0.00 8 4 gint mod;
100.00 12 4 guint mask;
0.00 16 4 guint nnodes;
0.00 20 4 guint noccupied;
- 0.00 0 4 guint have_big_keys;
- 0.00 0 4 guint have_big_values;
+ 0.00 24 1 guint have_big_keys:1;
+ 0.00 24 1 guint have_big_values:1;
0.00 32 8 gpointer keys;
0.00 40 8 guint* hashes;
0.00 48 8 gpointer values;
root@number:~#
As advertised :-)
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-20 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-15 22:38 [PATCH] perf annotate-data: Set bitfield member offset and size properly Namhyung Kim
2024-08-20 20:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-08-13 3:08 Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZsT_tHyuwb8L3KVB@x1 \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.