Re: [PATCH v11 3/9] remoteproc: k3-m4: Add a remoteproc driver for M4F subsystem

[Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>]

On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 10:54:11AM -0500, Andrew Davis wrote:
> On 8/19/24 10:39 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 19/08/2024 17:32, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > 
> > > > > > Please remove.
> > > > > Forget this comment since it would cause an error in __rproc_detach().
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Other than the above I'm good with this driver.  That said I can't move forward
> > > > > > without a nod from the DT crew.  I also noticed a fair amount of code
> > > > > > duplication with the k3_r5 and k3_dsp drivers.  Dealing with that should not be
> > > > > > part of the current work but will need to be done before another k3 driver can
> > > > > > be merged.
> > > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > The above still apply though.
> > > > 
> > > > Me or Nishanth will pick up the SoC DT patches via TI SoC tree, once the
> > > > driver patches are merged. Feel free to ignore those but queue
> > > > dt-bindings (already has DT maintainers ack) and driver patches via
> > > > rproc tree.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Can you provide a link where the DT maintainers have acknowledged the bindings?
> > 
> > The reviewed-by tag serves as acknowledgment as well and the binding
> > patch has it. Conor gave it on some earlier version of the patchset. I
> > did not check if there were any significant changes in the meantime, though.
> > 
> 
> Was reviewed in v8:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20240424190612.17349-2-afd@ti.com/#3302840
>

I didn't notice Conor had joined the DT crew and as such was expecting something
from either Rob or Krzysztof.  I am applying this set.

Thanks,
Mathieu

> If there was any significant changes since I would have dropped the tag.
> 
> Andrew
> 
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> >