All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
	"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Piotr Oledzki <ole@ans.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: core: Lock address during client device instantiation
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 15:20:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZsyBBevhURS-WR2E@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32a2d535-d7c8-47da-a42f-b41d3fae972f@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1541 bytes --]

On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 09:44:50PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Krzysztof reported an issue [0] which is caused by parallel attempts to
> instantiate the same I2C client device. This can happen if driver
> supports auto-detection, but certain devices are also instantiated
> explicitly.
> The original change isn't actually wrong, it just revealed that I2C core
> isn't prepared yet to handle this scenario.
> Calls to i2c_new_client_device() can be nested, therefore we can't use a
> simple mutex here. Parallel instantiation of devices at different addresses
> is ok, so we just have to prevent parallel instantiation at the same address.
> We can use a bitmap with one bit per 7-bit I2C client address, and atomic
> bit operations to set/check/clear bits.
> Now a parallel attempt to instantiate a device at the same address will
> result in -EBUSY being returned, avoiding the "sysfs: cannot create duplicate
> filename" splash.
> 
> Note: This patch version includes small cosmetic changes to the Tested-by
>       version, only functional change is that address locking is supported
>       for slave addresses too.
> 
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/9479fe4e-eb0c-407e-84c0-bd60c15baf74@ans.pl/T/#m12706546e8e2414d8f1a0dc61c53393f731685cc
> 
> Fixes: caba40ec3531 ("eeprom: at24: Probe for DDR3 thermal sensor in the SPD case")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Tested-by: Krzysztof Piotr Oledzki <ole@ans.pl>
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>

Applied to for-next, thanks!


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-26 13:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-15 19:44 [PATCH v2] i2c: core: Lock address during client device instantiation Heiner Kallweit
2024-08-15 23:10 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-08-16  6:12   ` Heiner Kallweit
2024-08-26 13:20 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZsyBBevhURS-WR2E@shikoro \
    --to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ole@ans.pl \
    --cc=wsa@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.