All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To: LEROY Christophe <christophe.leroy2@cs-soprasteria.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
	Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>,
	"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: vDSO: Do not rely on $ARCH for vdso_test_getrandom && vdso_test_chacha
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 14:43:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZtWzDZbJDrViFqke@zx2c4.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74494efd-7cfc-4535-a33d-b86fbae1c322@cs-soprasteria.com>

On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 12:39:17PM +0000, LEROY Christophe wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 02/09/2024 à 03:20, Jason A. Donenfeld a écrit :
> > On Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 08:43:10PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >>>> How would this fit in the logic where IIUC you just remove '_64' from
> >>>> 'x86_64' to get 'x86'
> >>>
> >>> Huh? That's not what tools/scripts/Makefile.arch does.
> >>
> >> Hum ... yes sorry I looked at it too quickly and mixed things up with
> >> the other patch.
> >>
> >> Nevertheless, if I understand well what tools/scripts/Makefile.arch does
> >> on an x86_64 for instance:
> >>
> >> uname -m returns x86_64
> >> HOSTARCH = x86 (sed -e s/x86_64/x86)
> >> ARCH = x86
> >> SRCARCH = x86
> >>
> >> If you build with make ARCH=x86_64,
> >> SRCARCH = x86
> >>
> >> So I still can't see how you can use that to know if it is a x86_64 or not.
> > 
> > By the use of CONFIG_X86_32, which is also used elsewhere in that
> > samme makefile for something else (so I assume it's wired up in the
> > context where it counts, and if not, that's a bug that affects both
> > spots and should be fixed)..
> 
> I looks like it is a left-over from the time vDSO selftests were in 
> Documentation/vDSO and were likely built with kernel config.
> 
> CONFIG_X86_32 was brought into tools/testing/selftests/vDSO by commit 
> f9b6b0ef6034 ("selftests: move vDSO tests from Documentation/vDSO") and 
> was meant to pass -lgcc_s when building vdso_standalone_test_x86 for 
> i386, but obviously it doesn't work:
> 
> $ make ARCH=i386 V=1
> gcc -std=gnu99 -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE=    vdso_test_gettimeofday.c 
> parse_vdso.c  -o 
> /home/chleroy/linux-powerpc/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_gettimeofday
> gcc -std=gnu99 -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE=    vdso_test_getcpu.c parse_vdso.c  -o 
> /home/chleroy/linux-powerpc/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_getcpu
> gcc -std=gnu99 -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE=    vdso_test_abi.c parse_vdso.c  -o 
> /home/chleroy/linux-powerpc/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_abi
> gcc -std=gnu99 -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE=    vdso_test_clock_getres.c  -o 
> /home/chleroy/linux-powerpc/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_clock_getres
> gcc -std=gnu99 -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE=  -ldl  vdso_test_correctness.c  -o 
> /home/chleroy/linux-powerpc/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_correctness
> 
> In another place in selftests (tools/testing/selftests/ipc/), they 
> manually add it:
> 
> ifeq ($(ARCH),i386)
>          ARCH := x86
> 	CFLAGS := -DCONFIG_X86_32 -D__i386__
> endif
> ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64)
> 	ARCH := x86
> 	CFLAGS := -DCONFIG_X86_64 -D__x86_64__
> endif
> 
> 
> So I think this is a confirmation that CONFIG_X86_32 doesn't exist in 
> selftests.

Interesting... Seems like both sites, then, should be fixed somehow...

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-02 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-31 17:11 [PATCH] selftests: vDSO: Do not rely on $ARCH for vdso_test_getrandom && vdso_test_chacha Christophe Leroy
2024-09-01 13:22 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-09-01 18:00   ` Christophe Leroy
2024-09-01 18:02     ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-09-01 18:43       ` Christophe Leroy
2024-09-02  1:20         ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-09-02 12:39           ` LEROY Christophe
2024-09-02 12:43             ` Jason A. Donenfeld [this message]
2024-09-02 12:22   ` Christophe Leroy
2024-09-02 12:37     ` Mark Brown
2024-09-02 13:23       ` Christophe Leroy
2024-09-02 13:57         ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-09-02 14:18           ` Christophe Leroy
2024-09-02 14:23             ` Christophe Leroy
2024-11-07  8:40   ` Christophe Leroy
2024-09-01 13:27 ` kernel test robot
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-09-01 12:56 kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZtWzDZbJDrViFqke@zx2c4.com \
    --to=jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy2@cs-soprasteria.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xry111@xry111.site \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.