Re: [RFC V1 0/6] Live update: cpr-transfer

[Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 12:29:07PM -0400, Steven Sistare wrote:
> I still go back to my original statement: -incoming-cpr  has equal or greater
> "specification complexity" than -cpr-uri.  It is not simpler, and comes with
> restrictions.

I'm ok with it, as long as Dan and others are ok.  I remember I should have
copied Paolo but I didn't see him in the loop, do it again.

Some context: it's about introducing yet another qemu cmdline for
cpr-transfer to specify a URI port for early stage loading of QEMU internal
stuff, which Dan raised concern on going against managing the VM using QMP
only and removing cmdline efforts.

For a generic follow up to yesterday's email: I was trying to re-read the
thread but I found that there can be a lot changes, so I figured maybe I
should wait for the new version.  IOW nothing else I can think of yet to
comment on the series.

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu