From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5D40CE7AA3 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2024 12:41:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.791788.1201791 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1smYH9-0007km-A6; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 12:41:19 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 791788.1201791; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 12:41:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1smYH9-0007kf-7M; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 12:41:19 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 791788; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 12:41:17 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1smYH7-0007kZ-MT for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 12:41:17 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1smYH5-0002Hr-Bn; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 12:41:15 +0000 Received: from [82.67.99.167] (helo=l14) by xenbits.xenproject.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1smYH5-0003n1-11; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 12:41:15 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xenproject.org; s=20200302mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=SBOAxdH2tEj/BwoU5pBQghNSzJMD0bIzSy/H/eNAb3M=; b=PdnbgQyqMaXL8ZANlVzYf2vOMy WJtpjR5Vf/oKKCbYYN4rfa0WzveOiwoLy3YYSsS1yftymBP1EZeDaWnVbn7EqbwjU6HH7+McqKtj5 N/6G6S+M9GSI91WIQhOqR0IeTkMAZZ8FJUEobb37yZ+U/Ss2FsefJX/WZ5wL8eQ045vM=; Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 14:41:13 +0200 From: Anthony PERARD To: Andrew Cooper Cc: Jan Beulich , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, osstest service owner Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 187507: regressions - FAIL Message-ID: References: <5ba7f4ea-4772-4bbf-9e9e-88d45c81b73a@citrix.com> <779f69aa-f1d3-4582-b08d-83f92d4614c2@citrix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <779f69aa-f1d3-4582-b08d-83f92d4614c2@citrix.com> On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 11:07:06AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > Interestingly, Gitlab's x86_32 build test missed this. > > https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/andyhhp/xen/-/jobs/7762103169 passed. > > I wonder if there's anything we should have done to get better coverage. osstest does `make build` before `make` (equivalent to `make all` or `make dist`). On gitlab, it's only `make dist`. `make all` in root Makefile doesn't call `all` in sub-directories, instead it calls `make install` recursively. The "install: all" rules seems to only be written in leaf makefile (probably for the best). Since there's nothing to install for x86_emulate, it doesn't depends on the "all" rule. So only "osstest" is going to build the tests. Cheers, -- Anthony PERARD